Show newer

@Lizette603_23 I had a cartoon about this topic... I'm looking for it. It was on my old phone, and I would just post it when I was being sealioned.

@Lizette603_23 @YourAnonRiots asking questions that are not designed to construct an argument, but ate designed to belittle the person you are questioning. Often these questions are phrased so as to be in good faith, when it is often obvious that the questions are not in good faith. Usually they are asked in an overly polite way.

The same politicians who are voting to repeal child labor regulations will help their kids, legally adults, buy a fridge for their dorm and all the other recommended supplies on the list from the university. Then pack their
“kid” into the SUV for the drive to campus—
one week early for freshman orientation.

That same politician will be glad they didn’t cry until on the drive back home. And then immediately call their kid—

And they probably couldn’t make sense of what point I’m making here.

In the case of the Nina Turner/Libertarian Part of NH squabble, EVERYONE is wrong. The LPNH group for suggestions that anyone, especially a black person, should pick crops for free, for still calling themselves "libertarian" when they obviously are not, and continuing to steal air from the rest of us. But Turner was obviously most at fault, for posting on Twitter.

@fuzzface @Alice , google search "naked fat guy" images, and I am #34. Make sure safe search is off.

Ya, I am a sapiosexual, and a straight male. So I REALLY need a lot of women to get into STEM programs.

@ShadSterling @llewelly @futurebird I am trying to point out the measurement issues, which do exist in very small energy photons, and I believe the same could exist in very high energy ones as well. It has been 30 years since my quantum mechanics class, so my language is clunky at best, and also probably misstated.

@freemo @niclas It's old anyway. from 2000. Not really worth reading, although I am...

@freemo @niclas Not a lot of current papers on the topic, but some papers have reported up to 40% effect by the sun's activity. The problem with this is it looks like that number doesn't take into account the 'solar constant' which has been changing since 1978, when we started to really study that number. THAT number has been FALLING, which would drive massive global cooling. So, unless the human factors are WAY more than measured, that claim is highly doubtful.

climate.nasa.gov/internal_reso

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.