Here’s what a firm does when it collects revenue: it invests that revenue in capturing more revenue.
Sometimes this might mean “more production,” by which most people mean “NEW production,” and that’s what orthodox economics imagines capitalists do. We have all this stuff today, you see, because people have endless hedonic wants, so we constantly invest our surplus into creating the tools to make ever more stuff.
But capitalists only *sometimes* invest in new production—building new machines, extracting new resources, etc. This is just one subset of capitalist investment. Here are some other things that capitalists do every single day to maximize their differential accumulation:
- buy patents to stop competitors from making and selling things
- lobbying the state for subsidies for themselves and regulatory obstacles for their competitors
- undercutting prices to drive their competitors out of business
- buying their competitors
Etc. Note that none of these expand production or create new production. All of these are either about *reducing their competitors’ income* and hopefully consolidating control over their capital instead.
5/
The problem with this story is that capitalists don’t seek revenue. They don’t even seek *profits,* which are revenues in excess of costs. There is a myth that human beings are utility-maximizing machines, and our sole goal is to perpetually increase the amount of goods and services we consume, creating ever more pleasure for ourselves. But this myth is false.
Capitalists aren’t seeking to get as much profit for themselves as they can by selling goods and services. Capitalists seek to maximize their *differential accumulation.* They want to *beat the average.* This is the underlying, inescapable drive of capital ownership in a competitive market.
4/
There is a common trope among capitalist apologists, and especially among right-libertarians who imagine that capitalism could somehow survive and indeed thrive in the absence of the state:
Capitalists want to earn profits. Humble and honest, these simple folks want to sell their wares and provide services in mutually beneficial exchanges. Surely, in a truly free market, none of them would ever intentionally harm their customers, because this would reduce their number of customers, scare away new customers, and harm their reputation. In True Capitalism©️™️ , this couldn’t happen.
This is, of course, silly nonsense.
3/
ProPublica just came out with another amazing piece of journalism, this one on the efforts by the capitalist firm Philips Respironics to hide the harms caused by its products.
Philips makes CPAP ventilator machines designed to be worn while asleep, creating positive air pressure to help people with sleep apnea. Back in 2010, Philips added a foam to its CPAP machines to reduce rattling that kept users awake at night. The foam Philips chose degrades, releasing toxic carcinogens directly into the mouths, throats, and lungs of users.
Philips knew about this *right away.* It spent years hiding reports that it was legally obligated to share with US governmental regulators. It waited over a *decade* to issue a recall. Thousands of people are sick; hundreds have died.
Go ahead and read the whole thing, if you have the stomach for it. It’s a typically excellent piece of investigative reporting by ProPublica:
https://www.propublica.org/article/philips-kept-warnings-about-dangerous-cpaps-secret-profits-soared
1/ #thread
A substantial number of insect biologists study social parasites. These are organisms that infiltrate the colonies of social insects, like ants or wasps, and divert resources to themselves without contributing to the functioning of the colony.
I gotta say, the super-wealthy who offshore money and purchase judges and politicians fit nearly every techincal definition of social parasitism.
I have history turned off (youtube reminds me constantly).
This is one of the suggestions when I watch a video of actor interviews on a talk show. Oh, you must want to see a whole pile of fascist d-bags.
There is no "left" equivalent of these people in the US, and I never get left(ish) suggestions under non-political videos at all.
Anyone who says youtube isn't boosting fascism is stupid.
just got told off by a repeater owner for saying "CQ" instead of "monitoring"
boomers really want to kill #HamRadio don't they
Basically, I disable (or don't enable) pretty much every generative AI "feature" that anybody throws at me, because I care about human creativity, accuracy of information, and have no desire to participate in what at this point is an utterly exploitative, garbage ecosystem. #Google #Microsoft #AI
Due to global warming, Vivaldi's Four Seasons have been reworked so that the Summer movement is 30% longer and played fortissimo, winter is 10% shorter and played pianissimo, with some random bars played sforzando, to account for the slowing of the North Atlantic Current, and both Spring and Autumn are now played very quickly and with abrupt changes in key, indicating their chaotic nature.
To be honest with you, I'm actually very tired of talking about racism on fedi. I am! Believe it or not, I am.
You know, I have other things I could talk about. I could talk about education or mental health, which is actually my field of expertise. Or I could talk about BG3 or Wheel of Time like all the other fantasy nerds. I do have interests, I'm not just some fucking discourse machine here!
That's actually, like, what I came on this space to do, you know? Have fun hanging out and talking to people who share some of my interests or relate to me???
But my attempted fun time keeps being interrupted by bullshit all the way from microaggressions to stalking (some of you, by the way, are very... shall we say, unwell? yeah) and ANYWAY.
It's very frustrating because I can't hardly turn around on here without some asshole reciting talking points you could have found in Derailing for Dummies over 10 years ago.
Our Anti-White Grievance of the Day today is (get your white supremacist bingo cards ready, folks)........APPROPRIATION!
And just in case you're going to pretend you don't believe me, I'll give you a previous example and the current example. For the ones that need their hands held.
Our previous example is the word "woke". Woke originated with AAVE some time ago and more recently, in the past several years, has been distorted into almost unrecognizability as an anti-black dogwhistle. How did this happen, you may ask? Why, it's not complicated at all: the covert racists found out a word Black people were using and copied it! Now, similarly to how these instances of racist telephone typically go, they took the word but lost some of the nuance from the term. This led to them frequently misusing it publicly. And once that had started happening, why there was nothing for it but for the overt racists to go ahead and coopt it from the covert racists (who they are obsessed with, by the way) so they could have their dogwhistle term du jour (politically correct was starting to wear out). This dogwhistle, mind you, has very little to do with its original usage, but of course they can't tell the difference so they don't care. And so we can see how this was an example of appropriation.
Our more recent example of this phenomenon is none other than the nasty little number lots of you are tossing about right now, fedi HOA. I'm not the first person to point this out of course, but since when have white people bothered listening the first time? For 10 ally points, can anyone in the class tell me the history of homeowner's associations, housing, and white supremacy? Anyone? Well, in case you don't know, feel free to look it up. Throw in redlining, the wealth gap, and the GI bill while you're at it. Those who do so or are already aware, you can understand why a lot of Black folks who tried fedi have spoken about the feeling of HOA-style treatment they received. Some of you were even the ones doing it! And now, in EXACTLY THE SAME WAY AS THE PREVIOUS EXAMPLE, several of you white fedizens started to use the term fedi HOA. Only it's not quite the same thing when you all use it. Lost a bit of nuance, hasn't it? You're not actually talking about a historical comparison of systematic racial discrimination in physical space to systematic racial discrimination in digital space, are you? No, you're using it to mean that Black people and people of color are creating and enforcing boundaries that you don't like.
So, you can understand why that's not the same thing, right? Some of the nuance got lost in the shuffle? Now, can someone tell me (for 50 ally points this time!) why that's bad? Can anyone identify how appropriation enabled antiblack discrimination in both cases? Anyone at all? How about how abusive it is to get this aggressive over someone else's boundaries? No? Yes?
Great. Well, at least you learned something.
⚠️”Earth’s life support systems so damaged that planet is “well outside of safe operating space for humanity”, scientists warned.
Their assessment found that 6 out of 9 “planetary boundaries” broken bc of human-caused pollution & destruction of natural world. The planetary boundaries are limits at which key global systems, such as climate, water, wildlife diversity, beyond which these systems’ ability to maintain a healthy planet is in serious peril” #ClimateCrisis
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/13/earth-well-outside-safe-operating-space-for-humanity-scientists-find?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
New at The Watch:
A sappy, self-indulgent, cliched, and absolutely necessary tribute to my recently deceased pup
Vocation: Oceanographer developing numerical modeling/data assimilation/coupled ensemble forecast systems on #HPC platforms mostly using FORTRAN/ksh/python.
Avocation: Mentor/coach for grade 7-12 FIRST #FRCrobotics and #FTCrobotics competition teams, so jack of all trades in/adjacent to closed-loop control and navigation, computer vision, digital graphics, CAD/CAM, 3Dprinter/laser cutter/CNC router and other shop fab. #omgrobots