Show newer

@clacke

As a weirdly weird person, I respect everybody, weird and non-weird, from all over the world.

BUT as far as I can see, non-weird people are (being manipulated so that they are) actively working to further marginalize weirdos.

The fact is that living and working with weird people is going to be weird by definition.

People can accept this and adapt to such weirdness or refuse this and expel us.

For a few decades has been a sort of "safe place" for weird people. Even because of people like (which I consider moderately weird, actually 😉).

For sure, some exploited such safety to misbehave, but these were not , but posing as such (for proper definitions of these terms look at tesio.it/documents/vademecum.t )

And now that Free Software is fundamental to and has a huge economical value, giving access to actual , the lip service isn't enough anymore and some urge to redefine free software as something that is... less weird (in US perspective, obviously, as many US people can't think about different perspectives).

I don't think this is going to improve the life for non-weird people (as most of them are basically oppressed people that internalized the oppressors' values themselves and thus heartily and unconsciously support the oppression system).

But it will increase , further marginalizing us.

@dthompson

Venture Capitalist vs Hacker (fictional, but I guess it would be pretty realistic) 

VC: Think big!

H: So, I have this protocol and this distributed operating system designed to replace primitive systems (, , , , ...) and the . But it's just the first step: the actual goal is to allow all people to program and debug their own software as they can read and write...

VC: Fine, fine, but what's the ?

H: 🤦‍♂️

Shamar boosted

You are working with #OpenSource platforms and have ideas that can benefit from EU funding?
Then you should watch this video and participate to the challenge:

peertube.opencloud.lu/videos/w

@ekaitz_zarraga

I get it.

It's fine if you are going to contribute the JSON writer to Chibi, but you should talk about this with the author.

There are several trade offs, if you think about it.

For example reading JSON is much more frequent than writing it, so performances matter more.

Also there are several ways to design the API of a JSON writer, while there is only one way to read it.

@phoe

Yeah!

Even is very strongly typed! 🤣
(seriously! 😉)

Anyway, I meant it lacks user defined data types and static type checking.

While I get how this would probably break homoiconicity, I feel coding without type checking... dangerous.

BUT, I have to say that when I was a young user I didn't feel such issue.

@ekaitz_zarraga

re: gnu drama 

@dthompson

Mind to define "positive change"?

For example I would consider very positive if becomes less and less welcoming to corporate .

Actually we should look for the people to join, as is not enough to me.

____

BTW, are you going to block/mute me too?
Beware: I'm not from the ?
I dare to be !

____

Sorry for the , but I've found this guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-s as a political abuse against my people.

You are marginalizing because they are weird.

You joint a mob lynching for what he said, forgetting that is a form of human expression, so IS .

@ekaitz_zarraga

Well, while I don't want to discourage ANY sort of experimentation, remember the task at hand is to reduce the build complexity by getting rid of .

Why?

My hope is to lessen the cost of going self hosted with Jehanne, as is way simpler to port than GoLang.

If you write in standard (aka POSIX) C, we will have to port it to Jehanne separately (and to build the Chibi to link it even on Linux)

Maybe a JSON writer would run unmodified on all systems.

____

Having said that... HAVE FUN! 😉

@ekaitz_zarraga

is a language.
(which is a very good thing! 🤣)

`displayed` is scaring.

There is something... "dangerous" in its lack of typing.
Or maybe I'm getting too old? 👴

BTW, would you mind to list the dependencies installation instructions in a README.txt under src_chibi?

Shamar boosted

I love how the logo for PNG (the image format) is a JPEG: libpng.org/pub/png/

they even have a FAQ entry about it: "If there's one concept you should take away from this site, it's Use the best tool for the job. In this case, that happens to be JPEG, which, at 76,563 bytes, is almost seven times smaller than the completely lossless PNG version"

which raises the question... why did you pick that image as your logo if it can't be compressed well as a PNG?

Shamar boosted
Shamar boosted

@mwlucas

Very interesting.

I need to think about this.

Meta: I really think you should write something about this.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.