Show newer

@marien

I can't speak French, but as an Italian I can find my way through it.

It think this is a very nice hack.

Très bon!

@DissidentKitty@radical.town @stolas@elekk.xyz @alan@mastodon.technology

I think the real news is that someone tested a scientific paper finding enough to spot one code bug.

If this will become an habit, we will see this sort of issues happening on a daily basis for a decade or so...

@grainloom

What exactly do you mean by "negative image of GNU"?

Are you talking about the lack of overall technical vision about the system or about something else?

@dthompson @cwebber

Why RMS was actually lynched. 

@downey

Yeah I don't understand.

If he has a history/legacy of abuse, people around him have a history/legacy of complicity in such abuses.

Each time they didn't denounce his abuses, they enabled each of the following ones.

So why I should feel better that the is now in the hands of such hypocrite abuse-enablers?

If these people were aware of crimes they didn't denounce they should be all processed as accomplices.

They should turn themselves in to the police, right NOW.
No kidding.

But if they don't, I have to deduce they are worse than , either as enablers or as liars.

if a free software project can't even be nice to women, it doesn't deserve to exist 

@grainloom

If a free software project has any aspect you don't like, it deserve to be forked.

welcome any .

Only people who cry of community breaks and such bullshit. After all forks reduce their share!

As for women, trust me: I care A LOT about them. I have three daughters I love most, and I always carefully consider what is good for them, in the present and in the future.

Is a homogenous world were all people talk the same good for them? Would it be safer?

The answer is simply No.

In Italy we have had a history of private abuses easily mixed with public to cover them.

In a world were people cannot TALK about something, such thing do not disappear. It just become invisible and more dangerous. Public just raise the stakes for powerful people, but it doesn't fix any perversion.

Since I want to effectively protect my daughters, I want a world where people with the weirdest opinions can discuss them while criminal like are rapidly and easily denounced.

Don't judge books by their cover: a project (or a man, or a woman or a company or..) might LOOK nice to a woman while being creepy and dangerous. And the converse can also be true.

I prefer places that are dangerous and look dangerous too.
They are LESS dangerous.

But censorship and mob lynching of opinion won't make things better.

@dthompson @cwebber

RMS 

@grainloom

You seem to assume that Politics is easier than Programming.

It's not.

Programming is way more funny.
And way less frustrating.
And I say this having experience of doing both, either separately or at the same time.

I don't know if code at all today, but he never stopped fighting for (his vision of) .

And despite the fact that I don't entirely agree with him on such vision, I call bullshit when people say he did nothing for in the last 20 or 30 years.

He did a huge lot.

But it you only measure work in term of SLOCs/hour because you internalized the corporate perspective of productivity, obviously all his work is worth nothing.

But beware, people who adopt such perspective are going to be exploited.

If all it matters to you is X (with X being any easy to measure scalar, such as $, €, SLOC/hour or whatever), you stop being an hacker, a user or even just a citizen and you become a , a that can be easily through software.

@dthompson @cwebber

It feels neglected and wants to leave.

I didn't intend to hurt your feelings, ...

(🤣)

Why RMS was actually lynched. 

@eqe

I think you misunderstood my words: I'm not a RMS fanboy and I'd have to ask you to not project the issues of the tech culture of over me: I'm from and I'm very good at dealing with my emotions! 😉

But my analysis of what happened is just political.

Let's break your arguments into three blocks:

1. lynching is killing
2. it's lynching only if the victim is without fault
3. it's lynching only if it's the action of a powerful group

Let my now debunk each of these arguments.

1.

As I said it's not a physical lynching as the people who joined the mob were way more cowards than the cowards of KKK.

It was a cybernetic lynching.

2.

As for what actually did, he wrote a mail to a mailing list expressing his own opinion on a matter. A careful read of that mail shows that all the outrage that followed was misdirected: of all the disgusting opinions of RMS over years, this is NOT the worst.

He didn't defended Epstein or rape or anything like that.

Yet, I don't think that the consequences of something RMS (or me, or you, or anybody else) wrote should be a public international cybernetic lynching.

If you say that RMS deserved it anyway, you are just negating him universal human rights. In particular article 18, 19 and 12.
I guess that if he was from any of the minorities that fill US people remorse (women, people of color, lgbt+ and so on), you would never argue that one of them deserve to be lynched for what they said! You would say (correctly) that they deserve a due process IF they did any crime.

And indeed, if he did any crime, he should processed FOR IT (with all people who covered him), not lynched for something else.

Now, even if RMS is not a saint (and he is not), and even if RMS can be considered a powerful man he actually belong to an oppressed minority, just not one of the one people feel remorse for: he is a . His weirdness does not help people to empathize with him, so that a pretty reasonable person like you might forget to consider he IS a human being with universal rights like any other.

And removing a weird from , weakened the position of many other weird hackers that, while completely different from RMS himself, are just as different from the mainstream.

And this led us to 3.

When something irrational and bad occurs in Italy, we are used to ask ourselves "cui prodest?", "who benefit from what happened?".

To whom RMS was a pain in the ass? Fine, to many. 🤣

But who had the to mount an international lynching like this without the mob even realizing they were violation the universal human rights of RMS?

.
All bound to , they need to get rid of .

And do you know what is funny?

Those naive (dumb?) heroes (cowards?) that joined the mob with their digital forks and pitches, will never accept of being naive cowards and they will try as hard as possible to rationalize and morally justify what happened.

"Because he deserved it!" I can hear you.

Guess what? He didn't.
Not for THAT mail.
Nor for any crime he did, because he deserve jail, if he did any crime.

But RMS is an easy prey.
He is weird, after all.
And US passion for doesn't include hackers.

If you were in the mob, please, open your eyes.

un.org/en/universal-declaratio

RMS 

@grainloom

Leading people means helping them move from a point to another.

Like it or not, but proved a great leadership in : he didn't just give it a definition and an identity, but turned it in a powerful and positive political movement. He was being so.successful that was created to embrace, extend and estinguish such movement.

Thank to we now have , browsers that are more complex to than operating systems and the four have been reduced to privileges.

However intransigence was still a pain in the ass for many people who want to finally absorb free software in open source.

Without Stallman at , are way stronger. Now THEY will lead!

Will be creepy with women?
No!

Does Google care about women?
Sure! They are valuable data cow to milk! Great workers! And useful conumers! Just like men.

Same for , and friends! They will be great leaders, if you want to be led where they want to milk you.

But I'm a weird . I prefer weird leaders. Because their weirdness protects mine. And yours.

Don't forget my words: nobody will fight for hackers' freedom. The gentrification process is running fast. First , now RMS... the next might be you!

@dthompson @cwebber

long, RMS lynching, free software, free speech 

Sergio Mattarella, President of rebuking Turkey's attacks in and even blames for his part in giving new life to and destabilizing .

While standing next to Trump.

twitter.com/i/status/118452084

long, RMS lynching, free software, free speech 

@eqe

No.

First, this HAS BEEN a lynching.
Thanks God, not a physical one, but a cybernetic one: misinformed people all over the world has been coordinated to shitpost him till they got his head at . But he has been lynched for WHAT HE WROTE. He hasn't been removed for his bad behavior with women. He hasn't been removed for his political use of his position in . He has been removed because of this "outcry" for what he wrote.

Now, if you argue that any of his behavior was so abusive that he alienated dozen of people from FS, without such behavior being illegal, then I agree with you: you should fight to change your laws to forbid such behaviour.

But if you argue that he should be held accountable for his opinions (most of which, I don't share) because such opinions alienated dozen, I think you haven't understand what free software is.

As I said, is a form.of expression: as President of Foundation and leader of , RMS had the duty to fully express his weird opinions.

People who can't live in a pluralistic society, working with people who have the weirdest opinions (but do no crime), don't really want , not for everybody at least. So if people left the free software movement for RMS opinions, they did the right thing (at least at that moment of their life) since they weren't going to contribute to freedom.

I think your valuation error is well evidenced by the use of the "productive" word. You are measiring people contribution by their throughput, as if GNU was a corporation building products that will compete in the market.

It is not.

It's a Political movement!

The real issue with RMS is that he doesn't belong to any of the minorities that populate remorse. He isn't a person.of color. He isn't a woman. He isn't gay. And so on.

He is a .

' passion for inclusion stop before of us.

We are too different to be included.
Too weird. We do not deserve due processes or civil rights. We not even to your eyes, I guess.

You want a bunch of nice, politically correct (aka hypocrites), people in FS. And RMS is not one of them.

@dthompson @cwebber

@downey

Yeah has this bad attitude with champions like those multinational corporations that control the of the (and what you think)!

As for "more harm than good" it's a ridiculous statement: while I think he got priorities wrong with , there would be no without . And there would be no without .

You are right this isn't a criminal proceeding so either he didn't do any crime (and those who lynched him violated his human rights as stated by article 18, 19 and 12, just to gain power) or he is (and all people who didn't denounced him are complicit)

@dthompson @cwebber

@dthompson

I noticed you are with Andy.

That's why I replied to @cwebber

I don't know personally and I disagree with him on MANY MANY things. Even when we talk about I think he is too moderate (and I'm a catholic Christian so you might guess by yourselves on how many other things I deeply disagree with him! 😉).

But the arguments of Andy are poor. As the arguments of the crowd that got is head at .

is a form of expression, so software IS freedom of expression.

Andy joined the crowd that lynched for what he WROTE (conveniently misreading it, to be precise).

If you know that Stallman did any crime towards women, you have only ONE thing to do: denounce him and provide evidence to the police.

Each day you delay his trial is a day more you are accomplices of his crimes.

I'm very serious on this.
There is nothing else to do when you face a crime.

If RMS did any crime, denounce him.

Otherwise, please, stop this.

@cwebber @dthompson

Smell like there are several power games at work in and in right now.

And since I've followed all the drama around ' mail and I've seen how a crowd of people lynched him for what he SAID, I can't say I'm shocked by this reaction from Andy.

I've read his words before and I see how he is trying to profit as much as possible from the shitstorm that is on right now.

Shamar boosted

reading and responding to a blog in annotated fashion 

> Open Source encourages theft
> I think we can agree that if I extract value from your labor, you deserve compensation.

What if I intentionally publish something that I want people to use because it advances my agenda? Like pkgconf for example.

> Money just is the medium for exchanging value, and without compensation, there is no fair exchange of value.

What about thank you notes, headpats, plushies and even cookies? Maybe I don't feel like I am being robbed because I refuse to contribute to open core projects unless I am being paid to do so.

> There’s just me stealing your labor.

Not if I voluntarily donate my labor to the commons (the actual commons, that is). At that point, any compensation (in the form of money, thank you notes, headpats, plushies and cookies) is just a bonus.

> The users of AzuraCast are stealing the labor of Buster Neece.

To the extent that iHeartRadio^WClearChannel is making use of his software, sure.

> Amazon is stealing the labor of MongoDB’s engineers.

MongoDB is an "open core" software that is funded by some of the most vile and cannibalistic vulture capital funds on the planet. I'll be sure to play a sad song on my violin once I unpack it.

> It’s a tragedy of the commons at planet scale.

I can think of many larger tragedies. Your ICE example, for one.
Show thread

@z

is not much different from : both depends on money.

@yogthos@mastodon.social

controls too and follow the predominant implementations (guess who is predominant) so, despite the rhetoric there is no openness (nor ) in such "Open Standards".

As for I think this comment express well the state of affairs since years: w3.org/blog/2017/12/whatwg-wor

Shamar boosted

Which browser is consuming much more power than competitive ones? @3rik presenting interesting numbers and thoughts on #digital #sustainability in connection with #FreeSoftware at the @fsfe GA.

So, what's your guess?

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.