L'Unesco a eu la grande idée de donner accès gratuitement à la bibliothèque numérique mondiale sur Internet.
Un beau cadeau à toute l'humanité !
wdl.org/fr Il rassemble des cartes, des textes, des photos, des enregistrements et des films de tous les temps et explique les joyaux et les reliques culturelles de toutes les bibliothèques de la planète, disponible en sept langues.

Supporting diamond open access journals.
Interest and feasibility of direct funding mechanisms.
tidsskrift.dk/njlis/article/vi

A Collection of Diamond/Platinum Open-Access Medical Journals indexed on PubMed
osf.io/preprints/osf/ng2xu

Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices
jkms.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3346/j

Nature :
nature.com/articles/d41586-023
Reproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different results from same data sets.
Wide distribution of findings shows how analytical choices drive conclusions.

And of course, Mastodon represents the social medium to use if you care about open science; as the UNESCO points out, it's important that the infrastructure we as scientists use is community-owned and open, not corporation-owned and subject to the CEO's whims.

Since I use social media to discuss science, meet colleagues, network, and disseminate to the general audience and colleagues, I can't keep using X with integrity.

unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/

🧵4/5

#SpringerNature is urging #India to create a "research fund".
newindianexpress.com/states/od

Though SN (or the article author) is careful not to say so explicitly, SN seems to be urging India to create a fund to pay #APCs.

h/t Subbiah Arunachalam

I missed this #Elsevier pilot project with #OpenPeerReview in 2019.
nature.com/articles/s41467-018

"Publishing [#PeerReview] reports did not significantly compromise referees’ willingness to review, recommendations, or turn-around times. Younger and non-academic scholars were more willing to…review & provided more positive & objective recommendations. Male referees tended to write more constructive reports…Only 8.1% of referees agreed to reveal their identity in the published report."

Update. New study: "Most journals [in #biology] offer minimal support for scientists whose first language is not English…Only 8% of the journals made their complete guidelines to authors available in at least one language other than English; less than 7% allowed authors to publish articles in languages other than English; and a mere 10% explicitly approved the use of references published in a language other than English."
nature.com/articles/d41586-023

#Multilingualism #MultilingualResearch

Show thread

J. R. Oppenheimer is much in the news. If you wish to access his first scientific paper, published in 1926 when he was 22 (the abstract alone is very edifying in terms of his genius), it is available online from Cambridge University Press and will cost you... €31.
Still a long way from !

cambridge.org/core/journals/ma

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.