Show newer

I still find it interesting how senior programmers value readability and clean code over the easy way ♥. They also create solutions that might be "the harder way" but the best ones, covering each scenario!
"<<" is a bitwise operator (bit shift) and pushes zeros from the left. So "x<<1" would mean pushing a zero from left to binary number x: 13<<1 => 00001101 -> 00011010 = 26.
Clean code tells a lot about a programmer and even though at the beginnind I didn't want to become an expert in this area, I want to now (still a long waaayy tho!). Thanks for that teaching, you. I've learned more than what I could show in that short period and I still value and remember that.

Me chama de doida.. mas eu nunca consegui me esquecer dele. Um coração tão bonito.. quem podería esquecer?
youtu.be/T67VQcHb7io

Dev Nadine boosted

How to really know that a Mathematical physicist is more a mathematician than a physicist? 🐀

Dev Nadine boosted

Latest monthly update for greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane (*new record*), and nitrous oxide (*new record*) 🥹

+ Observations provided by: gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/

Dev Nadine boosted

DIRECT MESSAGING

DMs on Mastodon work differently than on other platforms.

Graham Cluley, a well-respected British security blogger with a sharp sense of humor (and host of the Smashing Security podcast) has this to say:

“Imagine you are having a direct message conversation with someone on Mastodon about a sensitive subject.

Maybe George and Paul are bantering via direct message on Mastodon, and one of them says “I’ll tell you who’s a twit. That bloody @Ringo”

Well, because @Ringo has been mentioned in the chat, he now sees a copy of the message too. Ouch, that’s awkward.

This would be particularly dangerous if you were communicating with another Mastodon user to report abusive behaviour. Suddenly your abuser knows you are complaining about them.

Email doesn’t work like that. Twitter direct messages don’t work like that.

(Sorry Ringo for using your name in this example, Peace and Love man!)”

grahamcluley.com/mastodon-what

Marcus Hutchins pointed out -- in his excellent overview “A Twitter User's Guide to Mastodon”:

“Something to also be wary of is similar to how Twitter staff can read your DMs, so can Mastodon instance staff. If you send a DM to someone on another instance, both the staff on the sending and receiving instance could read your message if they wanted to. Just like on any social media platform, I do not advise using DMs to share sensitive information. Use DMs for normal discussions, or exchanging contacts. Any sensitive information should be sent via an End-to-end encrypted messaging app like Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, or Wire.”

escapingtech.com/tech/guides/a

@gcluley
#SmashingSecurity
#GrahamCluley
@malwaretech
#MarcusHutchins
#DirectMessages
#DMs

Eu amava... já tive o pior ano da minha vida desde que o litio foi descontinuado no meu país... é triste demais :broken_heart:
Agora eu gostaria de saber por que.
youtu.be/V-b0FECiOBQ

Dev Nadine boosted

RT from Lula (@LulaOficial)

Estive com @khrafnsson, editor-chefe do WikiLeaks, e com o editor Joseph Farrell, que me informaram da situação de saúde e da luta por liberdade de Julian Assange. Pedi para que enviassem minha solidariedade. Que Assange seja solto de sua injusta prisão.

📸: Cláudio Kbene

*Test* number 2. Please ignore this toot, I'm just trying this **Markdown** feauture. Friendly reminder, this is the Collatz conjecture: $C(x) = {3x+1 if x odd; x/2 if x even}$

Dev Nadine boosted

As right-wing extremists are re-platformed everywhere from Twitter to Mar-a-Lago, it’s more important than ever that we hold our journalists, researchers, & others to high standards of accountability when it comes to reporting on extremism and extremists. We need journalists who will tell us the truth, not stake out a position in the middle of two unequal sides. I keep coming back to this quote about reporting on the weather, but it was missing something — so I modified it to make it complete.

Dev Nadine boosted

Check out this video from @qiskit
Friendly reminder: last physics nobel prize DOES NOT state that communication travels faster than light. She, I think, explains it very well.
youtu.be/9OM0jSTeeBg

As long as our society keeps worshipping billionares we're doomed. Being billionare is carrying a label of "I've screwed so many people to get here". It is also important to let us remind that making a fortune is only possible when you have $resources and good luck (Apart from hard work, of course.)
nytimes.com/2022/11/19/opinion

@MeidasTouch and when this response is being written, he has 945,449 followers :blobbroken:

Dr Sabine Hossenfelder shared this article in her twitter profile. From times to times, insightful theories require simple maths ♥
Also, it is true that nowadays physicists are actually able to understand quantum physics, even when it is hard for, I think, most of us to concile it with how we perceive reality
Check it out! :)
theconversation.com/four-commo

Dev Nadine boosted

Periodic reminder: any system that requires you set a password and then specifies a maximum length... means it is either developed by numpties (whom you shouldn't trust with the security of your data) or that they're storing your password in plain text somewhere (e.g. a database with a limited field length) which means that they're decisively incompetent numpties. Either way, both should be avoided.

@arielbnz awwww thanks!!! ♥ I actually wasn't looking for anybody xD he just popped out :'3 hahaha ... I'll consider your words, thanks :3

I started dating someone about three weeks ago and at the very beginning I felt no much of an interest for this person....however, he managed to change that and actually had me to like him so much.... now he is going back -.- this is second time this happens to me ._. Why in the hell would someone make an effort for you to like them (reaally like them) and when you do they just don't feel interest for you anymore ._. I really want to understand that.. to me, that's basically playing people out. I'm inherently monogamous so I can only focus on one single partner once I've chosen him... I expect the same but that does not happen... to me xD
I think I should give up and just move on :ablobunamused: Rick was right; focus on science, love is a waste of energy and time u.u

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.