Show newer

re: us pol 

@moth
I will read the court documents, but yea it at least seems like he will follow through
@conatus @fluffy @realcaseyrollins @meowski @icedquinn

re: us pol 

@moth

filed by trump? Interesting I'll be curious to see how it works out

@conatus @fluffy @realcaseyrollins @meowski @icedquinn

@Electronics

Finished most of the prototype board. Never have I been so excited to solder something, specifically the shield. After several years of hard work putting that shield on was a trophy! Its something that has collected dust for periods too and this is the second version I went full cycle on.

For those wondering this is the RF analogy board for an advanced highly percise SWR meter with Network-analyzer like capabilities built into an shield. It measures a radio signals forward and reverse properties and compares them including complex impedance, complex reflection coefficient, SWR and much more. with two of them and a zigbee you can even operate one at your transmitter and the other at the antenna end and get both readouts in the shack. Cool stuff!

The yellow shielded wire wasnt working so I added a very tiny red wire instead. The final product wont need this and it may introduce some issues with the prototyping, lets hope not.

If you want to see more pictures of the project, including the GUI demo running or the earlier v1 version just check out the hashtag.

@Theverytechnologypony Is there a source on this FB close date? This is the first I'm hearing of it and my first instinct is it is just another one of those phony chain letters and has no legitimacy to it at all.

@carrabelloy

I took german in school but it was so long ago I forgot it. Then I moved to the netherlands, tried to learn Dutch, and quickly realized it was much harder than german was (for me). Even now without having studied or spoken german Since I was 14 (and even then not very well) I can understand bits and pieces of what you wrote. Not enough to hold a conversation or fully understand you, but I pick out enough to get an idea.. Words like Arbeit, macht, gut, schwerer, ist, man, auf, ja .. all words I understand (though schwerer i probably wouldnt have remembered if it werent for my dutch as the word is similar there).

@Gargron

re: us pol 

@fluffy

Indeed they werent. Luckily I had alrady went through that data yesterday. But might be useful for others, so thanks for updating.

@conatus @moth @meowski @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

re: us pol 

@fluffy

Yes I already read the post you just linked yesterday I think it was. As a data scientist myself I can say it did not show any evidence of fraud, though it could be a first step in exploring that. It identifies points in which events occur, it does not point to those events being fraud, in fact in some cases we do know the cause of the events.

I'd be happy to walk you through the analysis if you'd like and what it is actually saying.

As for if he can find evidence after a week, That seems weak to me. Trump has been claiming there is voter fraud for months. He had months to collect evidence that Democratic Party officials were colluding to rig the election. He also had months to prepare so as to be ready to collect the evidence as it unfolded.

That means either 1) he doesnt really care about fraud, he cares that he lost and is using fraud as an argument **only** because he lost. He therefore decided not to put energy into collecting evidence until after he knew he lost as he didnt wish to expose fraud if he won as that would work against him 2) he is actually interested in fraud but was simply unable to collect evidence despite being prepared months in advance. While that wouldnt mean there is no fraud it does mean there is no evidence.

@conatus @moth @meowski @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

re: us pol 

@moth

I know a lot of people who do that. Even at 2x speed it is much slower for me though. I spent some time training to speed read so I can consume text probably 40x faster than someone could speak it (just guessing, a page of text takes me about a second to consume).

@conatus @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

@bonifartius This is wildly incorrect and not at all in line with the actual numbers.

Lets start with the weight argument. The average weight of electric cars are 1799 kg, the average weight of cars in general in 2018 was 1841 kg, at least in the USA. No electric cars dont have a whole bunch of extra weight, but its easy to understand why, with an electric car you have batteries, and then one to 4 motors directly attached to each wheel (at least in the favored design of current electric cars). You eliminate a great deal of bulk needed in a traditional car from the engine block to the transmission (sorta), to the drive train, the differentials, a whole bunch of big thick chunks of metal arent there. Yes you also add things like batteries. So in the end the weight is actually very similar.

Also lets address the efficiency issues. This is almost completely untrue outside of a few fringe cases. In terms of the efficiency of the energy stored on board Electric cars are **significantly** more efficient. A petroleum based car has between 19% and 21% efficiency of the energy stored in the gas that actually gets used to drive the car. The vast majority of the energy is lost as heat. However modern electric cars coventry their onboard energy stored in the batteries at 80% efficiency. so if we talk about the cars electric is more efficient by a huge margin.

This makes sense when you consider that each time you convert energy to one form or another there is loss, so a principle of efficient design is direct utilization. gas goes from chemical, to heat/explosive, to linear moment, to angular moment. Each step has significant loss involved. Electric motors however convert the EM of electricity directly into angular momentum, and thus have far less loss and are far more efficient.

Now the only time you can start to argue there is an effiency advantage to gas based cars is when your electrical grid is 100% (or near to it) based off of gasoline or a similarly inefficient power source, in this case you would indeed be correct that start to finish your gas car will have a bit of an edge, however in reality that isnt the case in a single country. The USA is less than 0.1% oil based energy production. The vast majority (for example 75% in new england states) come from a combination of nuclear, hydro, solar, and wind. All of which produce electricity directly and as such an electric vehicle is **significantly** more efficient even when you consider the energy production all the way to the vehicle.

Hydrogen has its use in a few special situations but overall hydrogen tech for cars would be less efficient (significantly so) than electric. There are no nature sources of hydrogen, all hydrogen is produced from non hydrogen sources, for example hydrolysis, which is very inefficient and requires electricity as the input... So instead of running off the electricity directly first you waste half of it converting it into hydrogen, then stick it into a car that uses explosions to turn that into motion which as we already established is very inefficient and wastes another half or more of that energy. So that isnt a solution in most situations, not on its own.

re: us pol 

@fluffy

Time will tell. Lets hope trump has some really solid evidence we havent seen yet. Personally i have doubts trump will even go to court at all even if fraud is real. I suspect he cares more about having an excuse so he can claim he didnt really loose and save face than actually winning legally. At best i expect a half assed under budget court showing that gets dismissed and that he knows will get dismissed.

The cost to actually fight a legal battle like this would be astronomical id imagine, just the leg work to collect the evidence alone if it exists will be monumental. I dont think trump is willing to spend that.

I was excited when he said he was taking hillary to court, nothing. I was excited when he was going to take obama to court for alleged wire tapping, nothing. I dont expect him to follow through on this any more so than he did those examples, regardless of the reality.

@conatus @moth @meowski @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

re: us pol 

@moth

I know of him, read some of his comments. Probably havent watched what you are suggesting though no, I mostly invest time in information from reading rather than watching simply because of bandwidth. I can read a book in an hour, would take days for me to listen to it as spoken audio.

@conatus @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

re: us pol 

@moth

You asking me the top three most popular regardless of the degree of bias?

Its a 2 dimensional property so its hard to rank without knowing what I'm ranking...

Like there is some news that is extreme radical right, but is not very popular. There is other news with only a very marginal right lean that is almost insignificant that might be extremely popular. how would I rank these to make a top 3?

@meowski @conatus @realcaseyrollins @icedquinn

re: us pol 

@meowski

While I wouldnt use the word "brainwashed" due to the absolute cringe of that word (for me)... I do agree that anyone relying on news (that includes right leaning news but left as well) is absolutely ignorant of reality.

@icedquinn @realcaseyrollins @moth @conatus

re: us pol 

@moth

Fair, if that is true then I hope Trump is able to provide some evidence of collusion by someone in a position of power.

As I stated earlier regardless of the reality if all trump has are individuals commiting fraud on their own with no connection to the polticians or the party (other than being registered with it) then he is going to have a really hard time winning considering both democrats and republicans can and do commit fraud for their side individually.

However if he can show a news caster had some secret real numbers and published fake ones, or some coordination or intentional manipulation on the part of democrats to rig the election, then he will have a strong case I'd imagine.

Any suspicious behavior aside when it comes to hard evidence to win the sort of case he is making, I have yet to see it. The only real evidence (and no not just fishy behavior that isnt enough for court) has been a few random old ladies voting multiple times or something amounting to a few hundred votes...

Remember I am not asserting what **IS** (I never said if voted fraud is real or not), I am talking about what there is evidence for, evidence as in meets the standards of a court of law for submission... So far I havent heard of really any at all in this thread.

@icedquinn @conatus @realcaseyrollins

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.