🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@Diptchip I hope so, been working on it :)

@ethot

I said it gets the audience **I** want, not the audience **you** want.

@crunklord420

@ethot

depends on the intended audience or effect. As I said, tends to work in my favor to be detailed, keps the lazy people off of the threads.

@crunklord420

@crunklord420 Good, keeps the lazy people off my threads :)

Of course it was justice, the law was evaluate, found to be unfair, deemed illegal, and the votes from mail-in letters that werent postmarked **can not be counted**.

How is that not justice? The only thing is it had **absolutely no effect on the results of the election**, that doesnt make it unfair.

> Who have been hold accountable for these illegal activity?

It wasn't an illegal **activity** it was an illegal **law**, big difference. Again the number of letters that arrive accidentally missing a postmark are virtually 0, so it has **nothing** to do with the inauguration results and the problem was resolved regardless.

> Is there a full investigation of all known election frauds?

Investigations are for crimes where there is some evidence... a law which caused a few dozen letters to get counted that shouldn't have is not a crime nor indicative of anything needing investigation unless you can show it was evidence of some foul plot.

@StoneLi

> I'm tired to argue these things.
When I told you to drop it,I mean it.
> Drop it or I will make it happen.

In the future I **will** continue to post on any posts like this you make to ensure in the replies it is debunked so others can see. However I will do as you ask and not tag you when i reply to your posts, just to ensure you do not engage in the discussion per your wishes. But people reading these sort of posts do need to see why and how they are debunked.

I will respond to your other points in my next message as a reply without tagging you, per your request.

@StoneLi What you literally posted a case that was investigated, and rules **in your favor**. This post is literally counter proof to your argument that these cases wont be investigated or that they are biased to rule in the other direction.

As for us not debating the issue, you are most welcome not to engage, but you are on a STEM instance and posting mostly propaganda nonsense with no fact or science to back it. You should expect people to disagree, the point of this server is to discuss facts and have these very debates, not to act as a megaphone for misinformation and you expect people you cant or wont agree with not to speak, thats not our purpose.

@StoneLi Thats besides the point.

I am not disputing the fact that this should be illegal. What I am saying is that it has absolutely no effect on who was elected president, and argue that this case or any cases like it, has any relevance to the outcome of the last election would be nonsense.

@Atlas_Khan

Whats that have to do with this election, where it was not even remotely close in virginia? He won by a margin of about 500,000 in virginia.

@StoneLi

@StoneLi So You know how astonishing small a percentage it is for a mail-in ballot to arrive and to be accidentally absent a postmark. This is a non-issue

@cos can you email me the file your trying to attach so I can recreate the error, thanks.

jeffrey.freeman@qoto.org

@fortifieduniverse Yea its half real, they are selling the check marks to people to put on their home.

@koherecoWatchdog Did you mean to post this as a reply on a different status? Not sure it has any relevance to this thread.

@valleyforge yes I noticed that :)

@cjd dont even worry about the revolution, this pretty much tells people whose house to rob guilt free :)

Oh god the twitter influencer blue check mark has now come to the real world and you can apply to have one put on your home... this is how the world ends, this right here.

https://bluecheckhomes.com/?fbclid=IwAR0JHCvZ4mgrVSptEN1GSWo8X72sjT9er4CpV6onsrv7P-YZaTULSK7LxIw

@cos Nope seems to work fine.. perhaps your uploading a bad file of some sort?

@cos Let me test it...