🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@mur2501

You can

@hansw

#wallStreet #stocks #stockmarket @funny

Why is it always the rapscallions causing all the tomfoolery at a hootenanny?

@Pat

if things get really out of hand it may go from skylarking the tomfoolery!

@fortifieduniverse

@fortifieduniverse

It is always the rapscallions at the hootenanny that are responsible for the skylarking!

@Pat

@dv8

Ill be waiting for ya!

@fortifieduniverse

@fortifieduniverse everyone is invited when a hootenanny is involved!

@mur2501 at least they are honest about how seriously they take your privacy :)

@fortifieduniverse No I meant a party with folk music, the more traditional usage of the word.

@hansw best of luck to you, you will be missed here locally. Stay in touch.

@mur2501 I suspect it only shows you what country owns the IP address end point, not necessarily the server or data?

@Zoohouse I know i do.. ive been soooo busy.

I feel like there arent enough hootenannies anymore, we need more... I'm throwing a hootenanny!!!

@anonymoose

> whereas a red ‘X’ indicates a change to rules by a body other than the legislature, thus not in accordance with the US constitution.

That statement is false, at least in some cases. For example I notice you have court rulings (court order) as red marks. Courts are absolutely allowed make changes to effectively (key word) change laws. For example a court can deem a law unconstitutional as well as deem a practice need to be carried out due to constitutionality.

The whole point of our system is checks and balances so that no one branch has full control and dominion over the law.

so before we even get into the specific cases it seems your axiom is incorrect.

Now where do you have your point by point for each check mark on that list.. i want to see where each green or red mark is associated to a specific case that I can review. Where is the citation for each mark to review?

@Atlas @icedquinn

@anonymoose

Ahh I see, in your chart what does a green check vs a red check mean?

@Atlas @icedquinn

@morne what do you need help with exactly? and welcome great to have you here.

@anonymoose

Wait what, so many things wrong here... for starts judges do not only make choices based on the constitution, in fact most of their rulings arent consitutional in nature.. but all that aside.. lets take a step back..

The chart you added to your post isnt even at the link you posted. where is the source of the chart and the background data that formed it, let me start by looking there and going through it case by case.

@Atlas @icedquinn

@anonymoose

Your claim was not that there were changes made to the election. You specifically said:

>election laws illegally overruled by AGs and judges

Of that list, where is the list of the ones that were deemed illegal by a judge as you claimed?

@Atlas @icedquinn

@anonymoose

Sure, thanks

@Atlas @icedquinn

@anonymoose

> You're asking me to prove a negative

No I'm not, I didnt ask you to prove anything. You made specific claims:

> many states had election laws illegally overruled by AGs and judges without going through the constitutionally prescribed legislative process.

Asking you to show the evidence for what you specifically just claimed were already "facts" (thus according to you provably true) is not in any way asing you to prove a negative.

@Atlas @icedquinn