🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@pthenq1

The interactionb etween me and you has not been toxic.. but people have told you to kill yourself, die or worse a few times, I'd say that is pretty toxic

@mystik @TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @ew

@mystik

I have seen no good evidence to suggest the vaccine causes paralysis in the short term. Any short term health concerns from the vaccine of any significant concern are very unlikely or nonexistant.

The risks are simply long-term unknowns, not short term risks, those are mostly accounted for.

@TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @pthenq1 @ew

@pthenq1

so is this thread :)

@mystik @TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @ew

@pthenq1

Most people who get the vaccine will be fine. If there are medical issues we wont see it for many months down the line

@mystik @TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @ew

@mystik

Ok no.. there are treatments that have made treating it a little better. No guaranteed cures and that one certainly not.

@TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @pthenq1 @ew

@mystik

I know we are on a similar side of the issue and all but maybe try being a scootch less melodramatic?

@TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @pthenq1 @ew

@pthenq1

correct (though even a year of testing at this scale would be something)... my advice is unless you are at unusually high risk, dont vaccinate for one yar then reasses

@mystik @TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @ew

@pthenq1

though still circumvented all the usual required long term safety tests mind you.

@mystik @TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @ew

@slimshady Looking at the screenshot in that article it immediately disproves the headline... who is smart enough to understand why (hint look for the word death in the screenshot used as evidence)

@djsumdog

dj: "That would violate my rights to privacy and is wrong"

pthenq: "Dont they already violate your rights? thats why its ok if they violate it some more"

@inky

@BrightStar sure, feel free to walk away, only reason i bothered to respond to your conspiracy theory idiocy is because you popped into **my** feed.

Please feel free to shut up and walk away, I assure you I have **no** reason to ever communicate with you unless the time comes I get the unlikely urge to want to get dumber.

@inky It should, but its a bit of a loophole so likely wont.

@BrightStar Not true.. if a scientist would argue that peer review causes 50% false review it wouldn't be passing peer review since the scientists claiming that are the same scientists replicating results. The replication crisis is the concern you are describing and was checked in some detail, and the results do **not** show an across the board 50% error rate.

Presuming you are pulling from the actual numbers on the matter, and not some conspiracy theory nonsense, you are likely thinking of the poll where scientists said that 70% of them failed to reproduce an experiment **at least once**... they did **not** say they fail to reproduce experiments 50% of the time.

@BrightStar

> Again, I must stress that the pier review process produces scientific papers with 50% false results...

And as I said that is completely incorrect, the replication crisis is limited mostly to psychology and thus as a general statement that is completely false. Full stop.

@khird i do agree that adding one more disease to a list for a immunity check that already exists is minor.. with that said I'd argue even the existing immunity checks should be abolished and, at least from my expiernce, extremely rare.

The big issue here is that it seems to be supported by the federal government and may even bleed over to things like obtaining flights.

@BrightStar I am aware of the argument and real evidence it draws on... however your conclusion is, as I said, incorrect. The replication crisis is largely focused on the psychology sector and does not apply so much when we talk about peer-reviewed papers in other sectors. Moreover, as a I said the number of "incorrect facts" in non-peer reviewed sources is generally much much higher.

@BrightStar I've dont many many hours of research. I used to work professionally doing data analysis on disease proliferation, so this is a field im a bit of an expert in.. trust me, im pretty good on the research side... As i said more than happy to consider whatever peer reviewed high quality research you have to add, though good chance I've already seen it.

@akeno

Ok thats just distilled idiocy and not remotely true, and im the one complaining about this mess. Please stop making people like me look like an idiot by agreeing with me and then saying dumb shit like that, thanks.

@pthenq1 @ew @TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social

@akeno

Not sure what your talking about... I've been fairly unconvinced of the need for muzzles and largely been saying that while COVID is real, the fear is over hyped and the lockdowns excessive and harmful

@TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social

@djsumdog

Thats kinda how I see it.

@TruthAndFreedom@masthead.social @pthenq1