🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@Ottovonshitpost We dont even allow bots on our server and are pretty strict about it. There are less than a dozen exceptions to that.

@Ottovonshitpost Like I said I would have a long time ago if it werent for the fact that I have to moderate my community. Since I dont wish to block at a server level I still need to be availible should a poa user attack one of my users and i need to get involved

@trinsec It really really is. If i werent a moderator here I would have blocked the domain much sooner.

@zleap just need to go to the profile of anyone fromt he server, click the three dots and then select ban the domain.

@Jackuu

I never suggested tolerance. In fact quite the opposite I stated severe criminal sentencing and that they are completely guilty of their evil acts.

Not hating does not equate to tolerance. It equates to abhorring suffering and wishing to see people not act in ways that create the suffering of others which in turn leads to suffering for them.

@professionalbigot69 @shitgrifter

@adm Great to have you here. Welcome aboard. Hit me up anytime you want to chat.

I dont have any domains locally blocked, and QOTO doesnt really block domains for all its users, with a few small exceptions...

But man I am really temped to block poa.st. It seems to be the sludge from the bottom of the gene pool over there. I cant honestly remember ever having a productive conversation with anyone from that server.

Alas as a moderator who needs to keep an eye on his community I am reluctant to start blocking people or domains locally.

@internetfreak

No I made no "excuse" quite the opposite, I explicitly said it **didnt** excuse their actions.

@shitgrifter

@shitgrifter You can also defend a thing without needing to hate those things that attack it. Hate is not a prerequisite for defense.

The fact that you think it is is very troubling for your state of mind.

@shitgrifter hahah what a moron. Caring about what made an evil person evil and wishing those things never happened is not being an apologist, especially when i explicitly go so far as to say it does not in any way reduce their responsibility or blame personally.

Nice try, try again.

@swiley

The main page on mastodon is mostly static html. but its still part of mastodon.

@icedquinn

@swiley

It is a violation of the license whether they shared it or not. The fact that the mastodon code is currently live and used to host the main page, even with logins turned off, is already a violation in its own right. The fact that logins werent really turned off by hidden behind an unpublished link really isnt not a required part of the equation needed to be in violation.

@icedquinn

@icedquinn

Agreed and in response to blocking it I made the same assertion. Its a demo site, its too early to rally the team to ban something that may not even be an issue.

That doesnt change the fact that I hope they actually do go full ahead with this as is and violate the AGPL and get their ass handed to them. so I entirely support them moving forward.

@swiley

@mushambo why is there a lightening bolt striking a newspaper?

@Ebirkinezir

Yea it was dangerously close to crossing a bad line. Thankfully it didnt quite cross it as no one supported violence or sexual acts against a minor and even condemned such people with jail time.

So despite walking a fine line im happy with the conclusions.

@borzoi

@icedquinn

Yea I made that comment. Sorta. Its up but logins arent open yet (they were but only accidentally). So there is no content, no accounts, and nothing to follow. But the server is live and you can browse to it (even though you cant get past the front page).

So strictly since its live at all it is already in violation.

@swiley

@MRECheese I'm out of the loop myself, just started hearing the reports today. All I know is they brought up an instance as promised that is basically mastodon rebranded to hide its mastodon. I dont know much more than that.

@swiley I'm not sure if trump was honest about mastodon it would have "brought it to the mainstream". It may have even been a mastodon killer as the world boycotts it or something.

Hard to say though, sometimes bad publicity can be good publicity I guess.