🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@WhiteTemplar

Cool, glad we agree you should go away, now do it.

@mrman

@WhiteTemplar

hahahaha yea sorry you arent worth talking to, you lost me at the first sentence. You can go away now I see no value you can offer to any conversations about reality.

@mrman

@WhiteTemplar

No, when you kill your enemies you loose, in the worst possible ways. Your elusion to the Nazi government is proof of that. Here we are nearly a century after they killed their perceived enemies and what is the result? Nazism went from being in control of half of europe to not being in control of a single nation. It is illegal to support nazism in most of europe. Jews not only failed to be eradicated but now have their own country and have more power than they did throughout most of history prior.

They killed their enemies and as a direct result of that failed, and they should have failed. No if anything history has proven to us that extremism does not work, not in the long run.

@mrman

@Spaghettimon

Well you were half-joking, as was I :)

@Borbo

@Spaghettimon Or as more accurately described the pro-extremism crowd.

"Math is never just numbers, in the wrong hands it is a weapon, in the right hands it is deliverance" -- Foundations

#Math #Science #STEM #Philosophy @Science

@shoshin Npt sure where this guy is getting his info from. New trees sequester carbon at a greater rate than old trees since they grow faster where old trees of most species tend to not really get bigger very fast at all. Yes a small sapling in the first few years wont sequester very much at all that quickly accelerates in a logistic like curve.

The way to sequester the largest quantity of carbon is to cut down old growth and constantly replace it with new growth every 50 years or so.

Now im not saying we should cut down all old forests, there are concerns other than CO2 at play here. But if we are talking about CO2 then the comments here are misleading.

@timorl

After reading through this it is, truely appaling. Both in the sense of LGBT rights, which seem to be the focus and that is uncalled for in its own right, as well as an explicit restriction in freedom of speech, which is wrong even if it didnt target LGBT.

I can safely say I strongly oppose this on every level imaginable.

@pfm @oddtail @stux

@timorl

Thanks so much, much appreciated.

@pfm @oddtail @stux

@Senpai-kun

Its literally a picture of me at the top of a mountain I just hiked to. Are you really so inept at trolling the best you got is "look this person sweats" LOL

I dont care if you want to troll, but at least have the brain cells necessary to succeed if your going to waste your time.

@pfm @oddtail @stux

@yes

While L, G, and B make sense as they are all sexual orientations I will admit the T is out of place as it describes people who's gender and sex dont line up and is in no way associated with ones sexual orientation (the sex/gender you are attracted to relative to your own).

So while I dont feel T makes much sense as part of LGBT I **do** still see them as an oppressed group that gets a lot of disgusting hate and should be defended.

@pfm @oddtail @stux @Senpai-kun

@Senpai-kun

Not sure what you are implying by showing a sexy ass picture of me next to my statement about support for LGBT rights. But ok.

@pfm @oddtail @stux

@louisrcouture

If it doesnt have the density for a bus, then wouldnrt it be less so the case that it has the density for a tram, which would require a whole trail system to be built just to cater to a handful of people a day

@shoshin

@louisrcouture

Buses not going everywhere is a choice, not inherent. Maybe that suggests your bus network needs work.

In theory a bus system should be easier to develop that can "go everywhere" than a tram or train. A tram or train is limited to its tracks whereas a bus could easily go anywhere you can get to with a road.

@shoshin

@shoshin

Yea all my comments were about france-french not quebec-french. In fact from what interaction I have had with canadian french (mostly online) they tend to not have any of the usual snoot we associate with European french.

@mrsaturday @louisrcouture

@louisrcouture

Fair. The point being the issue of traffic when it comes to buses can be eliminated should it be a problem compared to a tram... Thoguh as I said I'd prefer a tram for the smaller footprint. That and its easier to make a tram electric than to force electric cars.

@shoshin

@shoshin

I generally find french "snootiness" to not really be hateful or judgemental so much as pride in their own culture... They think their foods and snacks and opinions are the best around, at least the french from france. But I dont find it obnoxious or anything. Its just a sense of "class" or "refinement" that is appreciated. In fact in my time in france I found an appreciation in the "snootiness" which often manifested as food and dishes with an attention to detail in its presentation, preperation, and sourcing of its ingredients. You get a feeling of fine dining at almost anywhere you go, and they take pride in that.

I almost never experienced that snootiness as "americans suck". I think americans might just take it too personally. Only time you might get knocked down a peg is if you try to argue an american equivalent of a food is superior... they will let you know you are wrong :)

@mrsaturday @louisrcouture

@mrsaturday

Keep in mind Americans have a **really** bad reputation as tourists world wide. This tends to cause people to anticipate drama from us and behave defensively. Some cultures react more strongly than others. But in their defense we do have a habit of starting drama everywhere we go.

@louisrcouture @shoshin