🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@thatonecalculator You were scammed, but not by me.. you bought into the very problem UFoI was trying to fix.. people spreading lies , known lies, disproven lies...

@gay @thatonecalculator

It is clear these are the very bad-actor instances that in part is why the UFoI is needed at all. david (the one int he link) was shown to have lied out of his ass repeatidly and threatens anyone who doesnt buy his lies, and now he suckered in another instance.

disgusting... Full receipts here: https://qoto.org/@freemo/109372395298660573

@thatonecalculator

What int he world are you talking about.. scammed how.. what rule are you even refering to that protects bad actors.. can you please explain what you mean, we would happily change the wording if there is such a rule.

@sammy

@thatonecalculator You have been removed fromt he sitte (will be updated in the next few minutes once the job completes)

@gay

What happened to them exactly?

@thatonecalculator

@slips

There is **no** rule of any kind that protects bad actores... what in the world are you on about.

@thatonecalculator

@gay

What are you talking about, people within the UFoI are more than welcome to defederate from any bad actor instances they want. If that bad actor instance happens to be int he UFoI then they are expelled from the UFoI as well.

@thatonecalculator

@Ryle

The people that unfollowed left the UFOI entierly, had nothing to do with the group tag as far as I know.

@ufoi

@edendestroyer @thatonecalculator

https://UFoI.org

@thatonecalculator We will happily remove you.. but what rules do you feel protect bad-actor instances, if any such rule exists we would immediately change such rules, that is not in the interest of the UFoI... can you bemore specific, as a member of the UFoI YOU get to define those rules.

@Ryle

the problem is people will probably useit out of context to attack us anyway since the clarification is burried somewhere else.

that said ill let the community chime in and ultimately ill go with the majority on this.

@ufoi

@Ryle

Having rules that were too simple is originally what got us in a ton of trouble with the community.. they felt the terms werent well defined and therefore didnt provide much protection

@ufoi

@realcaseyrollins @joaopinheiro @Ryle @kravietz @ufoi @greg @t1c @SolSoCoG @dump_stack @gregory @evan @selea @steve @thatonecalculator @jens

I just woke up and am catching up.. please include me int he new thread.

@joaopinheiro

They have now been removed fromt he UFoI in light of this report (im not sure if im blocked so you may want the rest of this thread to know).

@human_dude

@SamuelBepis

All of those examples are explicitly against the rules and we explicitly state as such.

@Darkayne

@lxo by that logic if you wear full hazmat gear, including at home youd spread even less disease and save even more lives. People draw a line where it becones an unhealthy trade off (hypochondria).

For me that line is wearing half hazmat gear (just a mask), for you its wearing the full suit. We can reasonably protect the vulnerable by wearing masks in old people homes and in high risk enounters.

@caujka The energy is coming from the case of the computer where some of the power is being transmitted through capacitive coupling or similar.. you are acting as a path to ground and thus allowing enough energy to flow for the glow.

I am fairly confident this wouldnt work if you werent touching the led or yourself to the computer.

@lxo Thankfully young children are pretty resistant to covid and they are very low risk.

That said there are plenty of peple int he world with compromised immune systems who would die from a cold, the flu, or even covid and tons of other diseases... Their situation is extremely unfortunate. But I dont think its reasonable to expect an entire world to live their life wearing hazmat balanced on the risks.