🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@nyquildotorg @stux

Yup, and thats why they retain the right on the copyright.

@nyquildotorg @stux

No, you'd think thats how it works, but no. In most NFT copyright applies and is retained by the original artist, not the NFT holder. The NFT holder simply has some rights of use.

Now you do have some NFTs (a small minority) where the copyright ownership is transferred with the NFT.

However regardless of which type of copyright agreement we have here it wouldnt really make stux free and clear either way because whoever has the copyright, its not him.

@rdr

I think you are thinking of trademarks.

@stux @lewdthewides

@stux

Has absolutely no relevance here. The fact that it is an NFT doesnt change the nature of the copyright over the image (which is not even transfered as part of the NFT).

@nyquildotorg

@nyquildotorg @stux

Certainly true but has little bearing on why this post would be illegal.

@lamp@berserker.town @stux

Since stux owns the server if a DMCA is filed it will likely be much more serious. If one of his users posted it then yea, but when the owner posts it the rules are very different.

@stux I have no intention of reporting it.. just looking out for you.

@stux As long as you know the risks I wont be saying anything. It seems blatent and intentional though so if anyone does report you you will have a hard time on this one I think.

@lamp@berserker.town @stux

There sure is, and this doesnt even approach the rules of fair use. there are for criteria to qualify as fair use, and this does not meet those.

@stux Wait what, you realize that is illegal to share copyrighted art right? I mean if your aware I dont care go for it, as long as you know this is illegal though (and my put your instance at risk as the mod too)

@medigoth Good, then we mostly agree.

That said correlation only shows correlation I think we all agree it **never** is evidence in and of itself of causation, for that wee either 1) need to control all variables in a lab setting (usually not possible) or 2) use other methods that can demonstrate (or at least suggest) causation... By the sound of it we agree here as well.

@SameGirlie Not sure I follow what you mean.

I assume you mean Trump? Thats a tough one. I mean I agree he was a piece of shit and hope he is found guilty and prevented from running a second time for sure... But are you suggesting that all presidents who are legitimately elected but later commit crimes should have all their SCOTUS selections reversed? All their rulings too? Not sure how that could be done in any practical sense, though I understand the spirit there.

So how would we legally determine what laws are constitutional now in a post-trump world?

@SameGirlie

::fingers crossed::

@SameGirlie Ahh interesting.. I will be curious to hear the results.

Personally I hope they say the loan forgiveness is unconstitutional and I hope the result is that the government passes laws that make college free or cheap the right way (paying FUTURE college bills, not past, and paid by the government not loan agencies).