🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@janantos

Preaching to the choire

@fredbrooker

@janantos

Most php programmers in my experience dont have a clear separation of front and back that talk via a rest layer like we tend to do with modern web apps.

@fredbrooker

@fredbrooker

To each their own, you write in whatever you enjoy...

All I know is I dont mind running a php web app, they are easy enough to use for a system admin for a service...

But I will never ever start a project in php and would avoid programming the language if I ever could despite understanding the language.

@janantos

@fredbrooker @janantos @ondrej

No shortage of thrm in this business for sure.

@fredbrooker @janantos

5+ nines sla refer to very high availibility servers.

@fredbrooker @janantos

Never claimed ruby was a great choice for work. Just that id use it over php if i were picking a modern web project if those were my choices.

Personally i wouldnt use ruby for webapps, though i love it for scripts and personal projects.

@janantos @fredbrooker

I was sticking to the list fred used

@fredbrooker

No i agree most of those languages arent the best for web apps.

Nodejs works, i dont like it as a web app server side language but it works (id take it over pho)... rust and go lang suck, php is better those are your only other choices...

Ill take ruby, java, or python over ruby for a webapp in a beartbeat though

@janantos

@fredbrooker

Depends what your writing it for... ill be honest while im happy to run a php app despite the fact that i know how to code in php id never personally code up an app in php, thats just my preference

@janantos

@mxtthxw

There are a lot of reasons we have the rigbt.

1) protection against tyrants
2) self determination
3) Defence
4) food
5) sport
6) freedom

@fredbrooker

Of the ones you listed the only acceptabke ones are:

Ruby
Python
C++
NodeJs
Rusr
Golang
Java

@janantos

@mxtthxw the second someone tries to take their guns ;)

@mxtthxw

Judge for yourself.. here are the comments on the various versions of the #2A

This is the version ratified by Delaware and used by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller:

> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Some state-ratified versions, such as Maryland's, omitted the first or final commas:

> A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The ratification acts from New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and South Carolina contained only one comma, but with differences in capitalization. Pennsylvania's act states:[34]

> A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

The ratification act from New Jersey has no commas:

> A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

@mxtthxw Virtually all of the amendments have typos... It may cause people to read it differently but I cant think of any clear cut cases where the typo caused a different meaning.

When different versions got signed of the bill of rights for example they had different typos in the different versions.

@jud

Yea if you think every single person who flys a confederate flag is doing it for racism then you have completely no expiernce with it and are talking out of your ass... disgusting.

You can remove yourself from the server if you wish. You havent broken any rules. Delete it yourself.

@toiletpaper

Are you asking me, I just finished running a company in Israel for 2 years just a little bit ago... Or you asking @jud ?

@jud

Why are you rambling nonsense about things I said **nothing** about.

> Do you remember what the Charlottesville white supremacist rally was about?

I said **nothing** about white supremicists, so no relevance to anything I said.

> Removal of a Confederate statue.

I said nothing about the statues.

> Those statues are about Jim Crow. The statues were erected as monuments to suppression of the former slaves and their heirs.

Cool, and again has nothing to do whith anything I said.. I didnt say anything about statues, jim crow or anything else.

The vast majority of people I've ever known who had a confederate flag abhored slavery, and dont see it in any way as a symbol intended to support the confederacy or slavery... Virtually all of them fly it, and see it, as a symbol of modern southern pride, nothing more nothing less.

As for a side note, the native americans overwhelmingly fought on the side of the south, not the north. Largely because the north was seen as far far more brutal to the natives.

@jud No one said anything about swastikas and torches. Stop with your racist false equivalency bullshit.

The people who fly a confederate flag do so because they are proud of the south **not** as a symbol of racism or hate.. People who show swastikas do so explicitly as a symbol of hate... these two are not equivalent.