Show newer

@icedquinn its not about design but if the creative element comes from you... I think they are struggling to define that but i think the examples are clear...

If you created a generative AI that trained off of your own work.. and you gave it your own work and the AI enahanced it to look nicer after your own style... pretty sure that would qualify.

@smallcircles

Thanks, i may just pop a link there to it if its useful but frankly id rather someone else do that so it doesnt look like self promotion. The fediverse is so toxic ive had admins loose their shit just for reaching out to resolve issues... Other people can handle the social side of the software.. ill build my tech, use it for myself, and open source if anyone else wants to take it.. ill add good instructions, but ill stay out of the threads.

Thanks, feel free to share it as you see fit. Also feel free to ask if i can help.

@justin @h

@icedquinn

Nope, in fact the explicitly say later that wouldnt be copy writable

It goes on to say:

If a work's traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship and the Office will not register it.[26]

For example, when an AI technology receives solely a prompt [27]

from a human and produces complex written, visual, or musical works in response, the “traditional elements of authorship” are determined and executed by the technology—not the human user. Based on the Office's understanding of the generative AI technologies currently available, users do not exercise ultimate creative control over how such systems interpret prompts and generate material.

@icedquinn

No, not ALL work by AI is copyrightable.. it is only copyrightable if the human "original mental conception" gave "form" to the work.

You can read the statement here:

federalregister.gov/documents/

Here is the relevant quote (its a long document and goes into more detail):

In the case of works containing AI-generated material, the Office will consider whether the AI contributions are the result of “mechanical reproduction” or instead of an author's “own original mental conception, to which [the author] gave visible form.” [24]

The answer will depend on the circumstances, particularly how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work.[25]

This is necessarily a case-by-case inquiry.

@icedquinn

No, not ALL work by AI is copyrightable.. it is only copyrightable if the human "original mental conception" gave "form" to the work.

You can read the statement here:

federalregister.gov/documents/

Here is the relevant quote (its a long document and goes into more detail):

In the case of works containing AI-generated material, the Office will consider whether the AI contributions are the result of “mechanical reproduction” or instead of an author's “own original mental conception, to which [the author] gave visible form.” [24]

The answer will depend on the circumstances, particularly how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work.[25]

This is necessarily a case-by-case inquiry.

@icedquinn

That was true until march 16th of this year... On match 16th it became possible for AI works to be copyrighted.

@freemo
scotus: :blobcatanime: you don't have any right to bodily autonomy as long as the CDC waves their hands
also scotus: :blobcatgoogly: shoet ppl

I just need to have @icedquinn summarize all my toots for me... would save me a lot of time :)

Q.U.I.N.N.  
@freemo scotus: :blobcatanime: you don't have any right to bodily autonomy as long as the CDC waves their hands also scotus: :blobcatgoogly: shoet...

I just need to have @icedquinn summarize all my toots for me... would save me a lot of time :)

Q.U.I.N.N.  
@freemo scotus: :blobcatanime: you don't have any right to bodily autonomy as long as the CDC waves their hands also scotus: :blobcatgoogly: shoet...

NICE! As much as I hate the right every once in a while they do something good. Apparently now states **must** issue permits to carry a handgun to anyone who requests it unless they have an explicit reason not to (like they have a criminal history)... This makes all states "shall issue" states!

This is great, am really excited to see the being expanded!

businessinsider.com/supreme-co

@justin

Not yet, and I use statically a bit loosely.. It uses a static site generator but some of the stuff where it is needed still runs as serverless functions.

Its basically hugo for the html with TS using tools to render some endpoints.. Most people still call it static though since the website itself i dont know why.

Its basically hugo + vercel

Only reason i think it counts as static is because without the serverless functions running and endpoints it will still serve up its just the AP stuff will only half-work.

But its currently open-source under apache. when im done int he next few days ill make sure the readme makes it easy to follow but for now it would be hard to figure out just from the source.

@AncientGood Here is the thread you asked for where I go into detail on statistics showing banning guns increases homicide and violent crime rates.

🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱  
NICE! As much as I hate the right every once in a while they do something good. Apparently now states **must** issue permits to carry a handgun to ...

Just a reminder, MLK Jr. was a centrist, at least so far as the parties go.

“I don’t think the Republican Party is a party full of the almighty God, nor is the Democratic Party. They both have weaknesses. And I’m not inextricably bound to either party.” -- MLK Jr.

@jargoggles

Ahh so we arent talking moderate in the political sense at all, MLK when he spoke of "white moderates" in this quote clearly was not talking in terms of political spectrum.

In fact when MLK did speak of parties he made quite clear he himself was a centrist:

“I don’t think the Republican Party is a party full of the almighty God, nor is the Democratic Party. They both have weaknesses. And I’m not inextricably bound to either party.” -- MLK Jr.

@Miriamm

Lol Biden is building border walls now... I thought we were all against that! I am not getting all my memos.

@darnell

Yes it is considered a serious crime... But 1st degree murder, the most serious crime of all, still gets you bail.

Innocent until proven guilty, no matter how serious the crime they cant treat you like your guilty and deny you bail before there is even a trial.

@darnell

> is wild! How was he not detained without bail the first time‽

I'm curious what the criteria are. My understanding the seriousness of the crime isnt as big a factor as flight risk, etc... but I could be dead wrong there. But if Chauvin could get bail for strangling a person slowly in front of a crowd this isnt surprising.

And yea its amazing ANYONE survived suicide by cop on this one.

That said why do you think its a failure of police? The police dont get to set bail, they arrested him, twice, with no deaths.. sounds like the police did their job correctly (for once) and if we blame anyone its the judge who issued the bail... or perhaps you had a different point?

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.