🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@admitsWrongIfProven Just my style of humour.

@admitsWrongIfProven Happy to, thanks.

Also, I prefer not to call it disagreeing. Lets just say there are times where I am right, and you are wrong :)

@hesgen As always Israel, like the Palestine, are a disgrace.

@admitsWrongIfProven Eh, what are ya gonna do. I gave him a chance.

@admitsWrongIfProven

No one can see it anymore.. basically he called someone a nazi for wanting free speech, I told them off and said it wasnt a good attitude for QOTO but didnt intend to act. then he basically told me to fuck myself (not in so many words) and then tried to insult me thinking /I was dutch (im not) which then made it racist.

@kilroy_was_here @KarunaX @TheEuropeanNetwork

@admitsWrongIfProven

Not sure what your talking about, this is the first time your participating in this thread and as far as I know no one has said anything to you.

@kilroy_was_here @KarunaX @TheEuropeanNetwork

@mdk

To be fair IMO all collections should have a common parent class, this would have all the common stuff like map, filter, getting the iterator, etc. I do agree with berkes that doing it as a method would look nicer and feel nicer.

That said, I cant think of any situation where it makes any sort of functional difference.

@berkes

@berkes on an iterator or on an interatable collection?

Regardless functionally how is there any meaningful difference?

@berkes

Python does have the functions though:

filter(other_func, map(the_func, the_list))

That should be roughly the same as what you asked for... Are you just complaining about the syntax, seems functionally pretty interchangable.

@berkes I'm fairly certain Python has this, but before i go figure out the exact syntax I want to understand your ask a bit better. Are you saying the functionality doesnt exist at all, or simply that you cant chain them together and they need to be on seperate lines, or something else I'm missing?

@meriafff

They should be denied existance by not voting for them, not choosing to advertise or promote them, and by not joining their ranks. If you cant succeed in that way then trying to silence them out of existance will only strengthen their cause.

We dont want them to exist, but we recognize trying to artifically silence them will only cause them to gain support, not loose it. It may seem pardoxical but it has been shown to be the case.

@KarunaX @ItaDude @TheEuropeanNetwork

@kilroy_was_here

Yea I know, and I didnt even WANT to boot the guy.

@KarunaX @TheEuropeanNetwork

@KarunaX Usually someone on either side finds something in there to equate me with being a radical fromt he other side... Its usually either my stance of limited time-frame for abortions (as I tend to lean rather aggressive and say within the first 2-months but only with free access to pregnancy tests), or my stance on guns... at least from the left. The right will usually take issue with everything else.

@KarunaX

You are welcome

He was borderline with his initial response. But him doubling down and getting more aggressive when called out clearly crossed the line.

I want people here who have respectful conversations no matter how much they disagree. Obviously if you were being rude to him then I wouldnt mind so much, but you were not being rude, and yet he increased his aggression regardless... yea no room for that.

@ItaDude @TheEuropeanNetwork

@SteelFolk That tracks :)

@robryk I mean to say there should be no laws which infringe on access to guns. In other words there should be a path to ownership for **all** guns, and that should not give preferential treatment to any class of person (which also means not putting up financial barriers).