🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@reviewer2 Edit button will be comming very soon. We are in the process of doing a rather big update, it will take several steps, but will introduce tons of new features on top of what we already have.

@creamqueen No client list of epstein was every published. You are probably refering to the court documents which names several people who had interactions with epstein, but nothing resembling a client list itself.

@reviewer2 Thats bonkers man... I would have left too to be honest.

@josh Huh? How you figure they can never be held accountable?

I really miss Stephan.

#StephanHawking

@reviewer2

Hey, did they say the post you boosted perpetuated ableism, or were they saying the account in general was ableist and therefore you cant boost anything from the account?

I just looked at the OP you are boosting, not the account just the image, and its really hard for me to see how that deserved moderator intervention. As the admin of QOTO I see nothing wrong with that post. In fact, while a bit hypberbolic, its kinda true. At least for the USA, everyone is pretty clinical at this point.

Side note. Did you review our rules? That is probably the best way for you to get a sense for this server and if it matches your needs. We do moderate, and we do restrict some things, but I like to think we are pretty reasonable overall.

@konfun

I didnt explain anything, i asked questions about the absurdity of your assertion. Meaning yet again you arent even reading.

@greg @randahl

@konfun

god you make less sense every time you post.

Ok so how do you determine what is international law then in this fictional framework of yours? Lets say you have two separate international treaties signed by different parties with opposite and conflicting "international law"... which one is the real law? Say just 2 nations, or 3, or 10 agree to something, is it international law then, how many need to agree before its international law.

And you say **I** have no clue, Ha!

@greg @randahl

@konfun

> what question? Could tou [sic] form it more clearly?

This is the question:

> So which sovereign state is the authority that enacted this law that Palestine is bound to that you cite they are violating?

Laws are enacted by governing bodies. International law is enacted by either a governing body (such as the EU) enacting it, in which case the countries that are members are beholden to it, or via treaty. You are claiming Palestine is in violation of international law. So what governing body are they a part of where they violate said law? Or which treaty did they sign which has such law in it?

Clear enough?

@greg @randahl

@konfun

You didnt answer the question, still waiting.

@greg @randahl

@konfun

> first of all not ‘Kiev’ but KYIV, you bigot

The city is not spelled with latin letters. Both Kyiv and Kiev are considered valid latinizations.

@randahl

@konfun

So which sovreign state is the authority that enacted this law that palestine is bound to that you cite they are violating?

@greg @randahl

@konfun

My statement is fairly unambiguous. I said:

> That would be like saying Ukranians are invading Kiev by recapturing it, makes no sense.

Since there is currently a war between Russia and Ukraine this is pretty unambiguous.

Chances are you had no idea what Kiev was and just pretended you did. Which really hurts your good-faith credibility in the discussion.

@randahl

@konfun

I think its kinda funny that you claim the UN has no authority then cite the very laws the UN is the authority of as an excuse for why Palestine is the bad guys.... you wont be getting points for consistency thats for sure.

@greg @randahl

@konfun

What, yes when Russia had control over Kiev yes it was sending hundreds of rockets towards Ukrainian territory. Also how can you say Russian occupied kiev is not funded by russia.

Your response makes no sense, which suggests you arent even reading what is said, or worse.

@randahl