Show newer

@currentbias

Cold-like is literally a cold.

You need to understand infection diseases are **not** defined by the viruses that cause them (usually) they are defined by how they present. You diagnose a cold by your symptoms, if you have the symtpoms you have a cold, that is true no matter what virus happens to be causing it. In fact a cold is causes by so many different viruses that it doesnt even stick to a single family... You can literally have one of any of a thousand different viruses and they are all colds, not just cold-like but actual colds.

@ABScientist

@ABScientist

As a COVID-19 research scientist your preaching to the choir man. No doubt.

I wouldnt say we are doing nothing though to protect these vulnerable people. I mean a **lot** was done, entier economies were shut down, vaccines developed, mask mandates had been issues, people went to extraordinary lengths to address it. You can argue they can do more, sure, you can always do more.

As for what we can do to protect them, I can think of a few things but not that much. Allow more remote work, better filtration systems in building with higher overall air flow, staying home when your sick... a few good things can be done but even then there isnt much else that is reasonable I can think of to do.

@currentbias

@ABScientist

I mean the gene lottery determining how fragile your immune system is nothing new, and hardly anything unique to COVID (aside from COVID just being a nastier bug than many).

@currentbias

@ABScientist

There is no doubt that we have seen vascular damage in COVID patients. I am not claiming the vascular damage thing doesnt happen.

The current body of studies is enough to make one wonder about it and want to investigate it. The body of evidence is far too early however to state it as fact, thats all, or much about it.

My guess, the vascular damage is real, but only occurs in special cases (such as having specific bad genes, or pre-existing damage) or in particularly severe infections. But in the overwhelming majority of minor infections in healthy people I suspect it does not lasting cardiovascular damage.

It would explain a lot of what is being seen in the body of literature IMO.

Regardless I do suspect it is a real element of this virus, just one that isnt a significant concern in the less severe and healthier cases.

@currentbias

@ABScientist

Indeed I have. Blood pressure has significantly improved since pre-covid, blood sugars as well, much improved. Cholesterol levels remain the same, neither good nor bad.

@currentbias

@ABScientist

Calling it a vascular disease is **way** to premature. There is preliminary evidence suggesting this is a reasonable take, but nothing remotely approaching a point where we can or should be saying such things like their facts.. there is a LOT of researc h to be done before we can say that is a fact.

And yea, as I said, it is very much different from the common cold in its more extreme cases for sure, no doubt there.

@ABScientist

I have had 7 pcr-confirmed COVID=19 infections so far. For what its worth I have never noticed even the slightest hint at a long term effect personally.

In fact over that time period my vitals have greatly improved as I have become more active.

@currentbias

@cihuapilli @BlueDot @freemo@mastodon.acm.org @wild1145 @BobMastodon @oliphant how is this relevant to the conversation, please?

My current interpretation is that you personally have strong opinions about @freemo's attitude. Neither of this has any relationship to the rules (I welcome corrections to this interpretation). Given what I've seen, my expectation is to be also blocked for this comment. Not a problem, but this is between individuals, not a matter of instance policies.

@currentbias

Its a bit more complicated than that. If we had said "flu" then yes, for sure. But a cold isnt caused by a specific class of viruses or even one.It is a set of symptoms.

A cold is essentially infalamation of the mucosa membranes that is **not** caused by a specific virus or class of viruses. It is a set of symptoms that many different viruses all cause.

So its a bit more nuanced than that because literally what we call the common cold comes from damn near anything, including coronaviruses.

@ABScientist

@ABScientist The bulk of cases can feel very cold like actually. But you are of course perfectly correct in saying that the more severe cases are not at all like a cold and can get quite serious.

Please reboost!

All applicants are guaranteed to get an interview for a IT job!

~13 IT positions still open. 100% remote, no fixed hours, open-source company. Good pay!

Original job post: qoto.org/@freemo/1119111738835

#Fedihire #Job #jobs #hiring #Programming #IT #AI #AGI #KnowledgeGraphs #semanticweb #ML #ChatGPT

Please reboost!

Trying something new, everyone is guaranteed an interview! Open interviews! For a limited time no one will be skipped (except for clear cases of abuse).

So we still have about 13 more 100% remote positions to hire for full-time market-fair positions here at QOTO/CleverThis.

100% remote, work from any beach, market-fair offers. Ethics first, we treat our people like family.

Focus on Knowledge Graphs, ML, AI, Mathematics, Java, C, looking for Polyglots.

We are an open-source first company, we give back heavily to the OSS community.

We need everything from jr to sr, data scientist to programmer. If your IT and your good, you might be a fit.

I will personally be both your direct boss, and hiring manager. I am also the founder and inventor.

All the job descriptions can be seen by going to this link and looking at the menu on the left-hand side where other positions are listed:

docs.cleverthis.com/en/human_r

If you would like to submit yourself for an interview, which for a limited time I am guaranteeing you will get a first stage interview, then you can submit your application here, and even schedule your interview as you apply!

cal.com/team/cleverthis/interv

For those of you who cant schedule during core hours you can even schedule in my free time if you'd like a chance (the company doesnt have fixed hours):

cal.com/team/cleverthis/interv

@freemo If you aren't already on fediblock, you're not really participating in the fedi.

@freemo @SpaceLifeForm @jerry @paco Hmm... Well, first off, I don't know a whole lot about this case. Seeing a bit of the discourse made me think of a few things though.

For starters, while "local servers" "sound" cool, once an Internet hostile country like the U.K. comes into the picture, it is far more uncool. Federation only really works well among people who actually believe in it for one. Even .art appears to be run by someone living there. Also, a few people there can be nosy, particularly about things which don't matter.

At first glance, it isn't obvious this server is run out of there, as it uses a .com domain. In fact, I was not aware of this, until I noticed the *other instance* he operates during the dispute between you and him.

Didn't the United States fight a revolution to escape from the control of the British crown?

He also seems more evasive than a liar.

@wild1145

There are people who would moderate for free given the right motivation.
"Keep the actual nazis away" is a good reason to want to moderate... but you'll want to find people who know the difference between "someone slightly to the right of me" and actual nazis...

@freemo

@LouisIngenthron

A common, and untrue conspiracy theory.

While there is a small hint of truth, that the voting numbers will not reflect actual support in a FPTP system the idea that that is reflective of the chance of a third party actually winning or that it favors the **same** two parties every time is absolutely incorrect.

FPTP only gives the illusion of a two party system because the parties that are in the lead tend to take a larger portion of the vote than the **real** support (due to effects from FPTP, namely coalition building effects). This however in no way suggests the same two parties will be locked in election after election. In fact quite the opposite.

FPTP actually will show a pattern where every time a third-party option wins it will go from very low support in the previous election (ie 1%) to majority support int he next, in a single step (51%+). Essentially FPTP only ensures every election 2 parties will take the bulk of the votes, it in no way suggests those 2 parties are more likely to remain in control.

It helps when you look at real support and how it translates. If you have real support such as Party A:21% B: 20% C: 19% D: 15% E: 15% F: 10% Then the actual voting results will be something like A: 60% B: 39%. So all C really needs is 2% more support to change things next election in all reality and if they do then youd have A and C getting the lead.

@WhiteCatTamer @lauren

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.