Paradoxes dont even come into play until you throw in possible answers.. The question itself is just a self-referential question without enough information to answer it.
Like this is a self referential question that is a paradox "This statement is false. Is the previous statement true?"
However in this case the question itself has no paradox it is just amiguous and self referential like this: "What is the answer to this question?"
"what is the chance that you be correct?" is a question sure, but it is equivalent to saying "What is the correct answer? 5 or cat?"
The question itself isnt complete.
Think of it outside of being a multiple choice question to see why:
"What is the chance you will answer this question correctly?" I dont provide you any choices, I expect you to verbalize an answer, whats the answer? The answer is "You did not give me enough information to answer the question".. if i provide multiple choices to the question those choices do not add additional information to the question, you arent actually answering the question all you can do is rule out paradoxical answers, but even if you manage to rule out all but one paradoxical answers it doesnt mean the one you are left with is "correct" since the original question didnt provide enough information.
@sacha There are forms of the question that we can infer have an answer through logical consistency though.. for example
A) 50%
B) 50%
C) 25%
D) 25%
We could infer both A and B are correct due to being logically consistent.. though still has the problem that the actual question or answer wasnt actually asserted so we really cant say its an answer.
@sacha Thats just because im armed with math.. this is actually a more convoluted form of Russels paradox
For example imagine the following:
Which answer is correct:
A) B is incorrect
B) A is correct
@sacha So with that said C can not be the answer because it implies no answers are correct, so C is ruled out. B can likewise be ruled out since it implies two of the answers are both correct, but B is the only one labeled as 50% so if it were the correct answer it would have to be in two places. You cant select B with a 50% chance, ergo B can not be the correct answer.
Now if one answer and only one answer were correct then we would have 25% as the correct answer. but both A and D have the correct answer, in that case adn thus actually has 50% chance, and thus is also paradoxical.
Ergo with the choices given none of the answers can create a logical consistency. Therefore we have a aprdoxical question that has no answer. in its original form, in the form i asked it however either A or D might be the answer but we have no way which is correct or if either are correct
@sacha Now if we take the form of the question I just stated, which is really what they are trying to say here, then it is solvable.
@sacha I think what we have going on here is the question just is worded poorly but is inferring another question... what it should say is.
"there is some unknown question to which 0 or more of the choices A to D are correct for. The question and the answers are not provided. Next to each of the letters is a percentage, the correct answers have a percentage next to it that is the correct percentage for picking a correct answer at random, the other have incorrect values next to them. From this information determine which is the correct answer"..
That is what it **intends** the question to be. But as worded, strictly speaking is not really worded correctly.
@sacha Now what i can do is select each answer until one creates a logical consistancy, but that doesnt mean it is actually correct.
@sacha So a few seconds after i said that I realize, the answer is undefined.. a question and a correct answer isnt really expressed here.. only way there is an answer is if you assume some number of correct answers.. like if i assume no answers are correct inherently then C, obviously..
It would be like asking "What is the correct answer to this question: cow or horse?"
@sacha I have not seen this one.. let me run through it real quick. though keep in mind it is possible it may not have an answer as there are setups like this that of course could be paradoxical.
@qapaq I dont get it, did something happen lately that I missed?
@sacha Easy enough mistake to make i suppose.
@sacha Part of the joke though is that 5 is the answer many people would get who dont know order of operations. So it seems like a plausible wrong answer, which makes it easier to not think past that and to just assume the OP doesnt know their order of operations.
@sacha hahaha indeed :) Easy mistake to make, but hey, thats the joke.
@sacha So your saying the answer in the post is correct?
@soundofsun The one I hear most often is amaroq . I cant say if its any good but its the one I hear most often.
NNNNOOOOOOO!!!!! I woke up to find Ruth Bader Ginsburg died. I really liked her for the most part.
Part of me thinks Trump has been able to select too many supreme court judges, but I must admit while Trump is a pretty shitty president overall his supreme court choices arent too bad and I think its good we have some strong 2nd and 1st amendment rights representatives on the supreme court now at least... So lets hope he makes a good choice.
@GerardAlbertC Mobster wanna bit who is a moron, vs the guy who opposed desegregation and has dementia... what a pair.
Jeffrey Phillips Freeman
Innovator & Entrepreneur in Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computing & Big Data. Avid SCUBA diver, Open-source developer, HAM radio operator, astrophotographer, and anything nerdy.
Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, USA, currently living in Utrecht, Netherlands, USA, and Thailand. Was also living in Israel, but left.
Pronouns: Sir / Mister
(Above pronouns are not intended to mock, i will respect any persons pronouns and only wish pronouns to show respect be used with me as well. These are called neopronouns, see an example of the word "frog" used as a neopronoun here: http://tinyurl.com/44hhej89 )
A proud member of the Penobscot Native American tribe, as well as a Mayflower passenger descendant. I sometimes post about my genealogical history.
My stance on various issues:
Education: Free to PhD, tax paid
Abortion: Protected, tax paid, limited time-frame
Welfare: Yes, no one should starve
UBI: No, use welfare
Racism: is real
Guns: Shall not be infringed
LGBT+/minorities: Support
Pronouns: Will respect
Trump: Moron, evil
Biden: Senile, racist
Police: ACAB
Drugs: Fully legal, no prescriptions needed
GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 8B23 64CD 2403 6DCB 7531 01D0 052D DA8E 0506 CBCE