🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@jojo

Finally got your own single-user instance I see :)

@pernia

Ok so some of the minor formatting issues you guys have mentioned with markdown such as a lack of space around bullet points or the inconsistent size of headers has now been fixed. The rich-text rendering and markdown should look a lot nicer now.

@design_RG This should address all the formatting issues you brought up (other than the fact that it doesnt work in dark theme, working on that next).. let me know if it renders agreeably for you now.

@Gargron We already have that in QOTO and I think we pulled it from upstream mastodon as I myself didnt code that part.. works great here so far. Thanks for the contribution.

@pganssle Not really, every decision a judge has ever made is public. so not sure what information your lacking but its certainly there. From your post it seemswhat you'd prefer is some sort of campaign website or something where candidates try to "sell" themselves to you. Personally I am kinda glad to hear there is none of that and your are forced to look up actual public record on your own to make a decision. I kinda wish the election of presidents were like that, no information other than their public record and its on you to research that.

With that said a judge's job is to be impartial and not to allow their own opinion of right and wrong to be applied bt rather to apply the law as it is written, impartially. As such I'd say even if a judge did have a website that indicated what their policies were and their agenda the very nature of a judge saying "these are the principles I believe in and will push for in my career" should disqualify a judge in a first place, any judge worthy of election should basically say "I have no policies within my career and will follow the law to the letter"

@khird

Ohh are you trying to do the latex inside markdown mode then? That will strip them.

Technically speaking you can force it in markdown mode if you use double slashes instead, but it isnt recommended as it can be buggy.

@design_RG @rgx

@khird

Those CSP errors are expected and it works without it.

@design_RG @rgx

@khird

You are missing the leading slashes before the parenthesis.

@design_RG @rgx

@seanking

Any personality flaws gargron may or may not have, which is a side discussion at best, doesnt really change how **you** will be viewed. You are acting like an 8 year old during this discussion, whether Gargron is immature or not does nothing to change that fact and therefore need not be addressed in this context.

@Gargron @alex

@seanking

What are you like 8 years old...

No QOTO wont be blocking the instance until they spam us and then we will worry about it. But man you are acting the fool right now.

@Gargron @alex

@seanking

"I was spammed by X, im going to block them" is pretty laughable to claim as fear mongering..

though you know what is fear mongering... making a big deal about someone blocking a tech demo...

@Gargron @alex

@seanking

Its a 10 minute tech demo, it states pretty clearly what its purpose is. I have absolutely no issue with Alex hosting the service or it existing, it serves the purpose of demoing pleroma and that's great.

But its nature is, as you already agreed, as a tech demo. Blocking it from production servers therefore does no harm and in no way prevents it from accomplishing its purpose.

@Gargron @alex

@hansw@mastodon.social See the bottom part of this post where I discuss groups a bit. If that doesnt answer your questions let me know and I'll point you to it.

https://qoto.org/@QOTO/105103290563997580

@seanking

> Nice guilt-by-association, sweetheart.

You need to work on those reading comprehension skills there buddy. No one said you were guilty by association. Nor does the quote you used make any sense. No one said anyone was guilty of anything.

> So, you’re so mad at me

No, I am not mad at you. I think you are acting like a child in the way your speaking to people, but no I'm not mad at you.

> You’re blocking a tech demo, which is just a waste of time and resources

Who cares, it takes about 3 seconds to block something. Far **far** less time and resources than you've already made me waste responding to you or that you wasted trolling people on this thread.

@Gargron

@design_RG

Ahh yes, I remember you mentioning that. Shame they still havent fixed it.

@gioypi

@seanking

You are the only one going around calling people gulliable and attacking them for blocking a tech demo... say it slowly a... tech... demo.... It is not an instance, its purpose is to be a tech demo, no one is harmed by blocking it.

The fact that you or anyone could and have used it responsibly is irrelevant.

Going off on people because they reject packets from open spam relays is like going off on someone blocking spam calls on their phone.

Considering you are acting the way you are over how someone has responded to a tech demo means the whole "oh your gullible for listening to gargron over me" nonsense isnt going to go far.

@Gargron

@seanking

No one was triggered. Gargron saw an instance that was engaging in ban evasion that had no moderation to address the issue and banned them, he let people know. That was the end of the story. You are the only one who engaged in condescending language to then berate that decision and anyone who provided support to it.

@Gargron

@gioypi

Ahh I see, thanks.

@design_RG @rgx