🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@L29Ah
Me too....
@Electronics

@mewmew

Nope not my argument at all.

You do realize quotes are supposed to be used for things people have said right, not imaginary things you want to argue over that you think they said but didnt. I can see now where that disconnect from reality comes from if you cant even correctly reiterate what i said moment ts ago.

Probably best, and far more polite, to ask for clarity when you struggle to understand a persons point rather than whatever nonsense that just was. Come on your better than that dont start acting like those clowns all of a sudden.

@djsumdog

@mewmew
I never said they did. Election fraud is not limited to the counting of ballots. By definition it is any illegal process that causes one person to get more votes than they otherwise would. You simply incorrectly assumed that my statement was supposedly about vote counting.
@djsumdog

@dlek
Thats correct. Election fraud is not limited to counting votes. In this case the election fraud would be due to circumventing the laws around elections wrt advertising and campaign funding since the russians were basically accused of campaigning for trump and using tactics that do not follow the election rules. So would still be considered election fraud.
@mewmew @djsumdog

@mewmew
What rock have you been under where you dont know about the claim the russians interfered with the election to get Trump elected? It basically circumvented the usual legal cap we place on campaign financing if the russians did interfere. So yes that would be election fraud.
@djsumdog

@lucifargundam
Osh park i think offered flex. Dirtypcb might too.
@Electronics

@mewmew

Argue against what? I made no claims other than pointing out the democrats spent 4 years trying to impeach trump for, in part, election fraud... If you really think that doesnt resemble reality then you arent in touch with reality yourself clearly.

@djsumdog

@mewmew
I live in philly. Partly true. poll.watchers were allowed in polling places. However despite a legal battle to have the right to also watch in satellites where the mail in ballots are submitted (their real concern) they were completely banned and denied

@djsumdog

@mewmew
I have heard democrats talk about election fraud being a rampant problems for decades and spent most of trumps presidency trying to prove it to be true. After spending four years insisting the election system is rigged now all of a sudden the system is infallible?

Don't get me wrongs i dont think its rigged, i wont dismiss it, but i want to see evidence and i have yet to see any.

I am just more concerned with the hypocrisy of a party that spent 4 years trying to go to court to get Trump kicked out for election fraud with no evidence is now all of a sudden completely offended when trump does the same and has been at it for only a day?

Also lets not forget Al Gore spent 35 days after the election was called claiming fraud before finally conceding

@djsumdog

So the democrats managed to elect the first president in my life time who fought to keep schools segregated. The saddest part of that is they arent even ashamed of themselves right now.

#uspol

@Frankie

As usual not even enough brain cells to understand the conversation.

I provided two sets of examples, one being the serial killers who are at the fringes and some of the more evil people. As well as examples of the majority "the norm". To cover both basis.. But of course you have some sort of serious mental problem and cant handle someone disagreeing with you without throwing a hissy fit.

Honestly your a complete joke and its very amusing.. "Oh no your an idiot for giving an example that isnt the norm"... two seconds later "Oh no your an idiot for giving an example that is the norm"...

LOLits not every day I get to see this level of stupid.

Either way I'm done, you have at the very least demonstrated you provide no value to any conversation and are just going to have an episode unless your in a lice little safe space echo chamber... so fuck off and get your wish.

@crunklord420 @realDonaldTrump

@realDonaldTrump

Be specific, which ones specifically said "I just like killing people" or similar? I never said serial killers killing for religious reasons was the norm, but I did say they almost always justify it some how (religion being only one example of that).

So what your really asking us to compare is the ratio of serial killers who provided some moral justification to why they did what they did, any justification, vs ones who have stated "I just enjoyed killing".

I am no expert, so I dont really know what the ratio would be, but I honestly dont know of any who didnt try to justify their actions somehow..

Since you seem to have an idea of what this ratio is can you list a few serial killers who explicitly stated they did it just cause they liked doing it and nothing else?

@Frankie @crunklord420

@Frankie

You do realize after getting called out on contradicting yourself and trying to frame it as if other people are stupid, then going on to have a temper tantrum, and a pretty sad looking one at that, isnt going to help you recover right?

@realDonaldTrump

Isnt relevant? You mean except for all the real world serial murders who fit this exact description...

* Stanley Mossburg - murdered people because "god needs them" (his own words)

* albert fish - designed all his murders around stories in the bible, specifically genesis.

* Herbert Mullin 0 a bit reversed in this case, though the principle is similar. He heard voices from albert einstein telling him he was the new leader of the human race and was compelled to kill religious leaders.

* Gary ridgeway - Killed prostitutes because he through god thought they were evil. Even went so far as to leave religious symbology at the murder scenes intentionally.

I think you get the point...

@crunklord420 @Frankie

@Frankie Not quite yet but listening to you talk I'm getting there awfully fast.

@Frankie so you criticize the serial killer example because it doesnt apply to the majority:

> not sure what appeals to a divine mandate made serial killers have to do with the majority of people

and now your criticism is I that I am talking about the majority (the norm, as in the majority of people)

> nobody's talking about the norm.

So in order to make a coherent in point in your mindsomehow I have to neither talk about the majority, or the fringe? Me thinks you really care very little about any points that arent your own at this point.

@Frankie

You are welcome to that opinion of course, and maybe you met some of the very rare exceptions to the rule. But I wouldnt say that is anywhere near the norm. Even when ive known people who enjoyed the misery of others thry still tended to justify it by seeing those people as deserving of it. They almost always have some reasoning, i cant say ive ever met someone who answered why they did aomething evil with "Because it was the evil thing to do"

@crunklord420 @realDonaldTrump

@a7

Damn you got some issues.

@crunklord420

@Frankie
I would agree with you that the totalistim of the statement made it untrue. Ki da weird you dont see the relevance of serial killer example though. Its to show that in even the most obvious cases of evil people still tend to be able to see it as good. For more everyday sorta of evil it would make sense that would be much easier to convince yourself it isnt evil since it is a less obvious sort of evil.
@crunklord420 @realDonaldTrump