That would be very situational and ultimately only your doctor can answer that on a case by case basis.
As someone who has a passing familiarity I'd say it depends largely on the type of vaccine. If its a live vaccine then no way, compromised immune system would not want to take such a vaccine whether it passed safety tests or not. However with vaccines that have no life material then no matter how weak your immune system might be it simply cant replicate. Though its possible you might need more doses than an average person.
Most of the risk from an inactivated vaccine that hasnt passed safety trial would be things like ADE (antibody-depedent enhancement), or an overactive immune response to the injection that might cause immediate complications.. essentially the risks revolve around your immune system reacting more strongly than anticipated, so I'd presume that if your immune system is compromise those risk factors may be less not more in that case.
@lupyuen cant argue there. a comprimised immune system seems like a very difficult condition to live with particular given the current situation.
@lupyuen totally understandable. Even with normal vaccines they usually open them up with less safety testing for people who are more vulnerable. It just makes sense sinc eyou are dealing with a different risk-reward equation than someone with a normally functioning immune system.
On most tests, which i personally feel accurately describes me, I'd be libertarian-centrist. That is middle on the left-right spectrum, and bottom on the top/authoritarian-bottom/libertarian part of the compass.
@icedquinn @meowski @crunklord420 @mystik @fluffy @SystemSock
@lupyuen I think ill wait a year or two until the safety is on par with existing vaccines.. I think its foolish to jump in on a vaccine that skipped the usual safety tests (long term trials).
As long as the person being amputated/neutered is consenting so be it.. as long as the doctor consents to a bullet to the head, so be it.
And yes Guns et el are all rights I would support and are best voted for by doing. I bought my AR-15 to show my support for gun rights, it helps that it is fun too.
@icedquinn @crunklord420 @meowski @fluffy @deadheat @SystemSock
And the winner of triggered snowflake award for today goes to:
🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉
@SystemSock @deadheat @crunklord420 @icedquinn @wikifarms @fluffy
Well there is certainly a double standard, and we covered some of that from a different angle earlier. That double standard should be resolved. I tend to lean towards deregulation, warn the patient, strongly press them to not jump into it, but in the end the patient makes the call.
Yea agreed, im not suggesting they just hand it out like candy... I think its reasonable that the doctor spend some time pressing the point that it is risky and irreversable, as well as making sure the patient is of sound mind.. but the current process seems a bit much.. i dunno i could go either way.. as long as the patient in the end gets the choice I guess.
@Smontera I certainly wont lose any sleep to know her shit is getting pirated.
@Smontera I'm not sure if she is a transphobe but her views are certainly ones I dont like, don't agree with, and I think are harmful towards transexuals. So I dont like her opinions much or really her as a person.
But hey, I guess as long as you pirate things and make sure she isnt profiting no harm done.
blah blah blah.. another triggered fucking snowflake.. shame your mommy didnt breastfeed you, but I guess in a way its a good thing, heroin addicts should not be breastfeeding anyway.
For once I actually agree with you 100%, we should change the medical ethics for everything else to be consistent.. Someone wants a healthy limb amputated, let them, they want to try off label medication, let them.. hell I'd get rid of prescriptions all together and let people decide what they take...
Absolutely, the standard of "my body my choice" should be applied everywhere, and its not, and id happily support that change.
Their body, their choice as far as I'm concerned. By the age these decisions are made they are more than capable of deciding for themselves what they want to do with their bodies.
As for if it is harmful, thats the problem.. it clear sometimes not transitioning causes more harm than good and its clear sometimes transitioning causes more good than harm.. it tends to be very situational and you'd be an idiot to think its not nuanced or complicated.
I'd say that as long as the child was evaluated psychologically and other less invasive routes were considered and tried, and the child seems to be sane enough to make their own decisions, then in the end its up to them.
#TIL Internet Archive's new service: Internet Archive Scholar. Search 25 million research articles preserved in the Internet Archive. https://scholar.archive.org/
Jeffrey Phillips Freeman
Innovator & Entrepreneur in Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computing & Big Data. Avid SCUBA diver, Open-source developer, HAM radio operator, astrophotographer, and anything nerdy.
Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, USA, currently living in Utrecht, Netherlands, USA, and Thailand. Was also living in Israel, but left.
Pronouns: Sir / Mister
(Above pronouns are not intended to mock, i will respect any persons pronouns and only wish pronouns to show respect be used with me as well. These are called neopronouns, see an example of the word "frog" used as a neopronoun here: http://tinyurl.com/44hhej89 )
A proud member of the Penobscot Native American tribe, as well as a Mayflower passenger descendant. I sometimes post about my genealogical history.
My stance on various issues:
Education: Free to PhD, tax paid
Abortion: Protected, tax paid, limited time-frame
Welfare: Yes, no one should starve
UBI: No, use welfare
Racism: is real
Guns: Shall not be infringed
LGBT+/minorities: Support
Pronouns: Will respect
Trump: Moron, evil
Biden: Senile, racist
Police: ACAB
Drugs: Fully legal, no prescriptions needed
GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 8B23 64CD 2403 6DCB 7531 01D0 052D DA8E 0506 CBCE