🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@imvectech what is the exact link your viewing 300 followers from?

@imvectech Weird, I'm looking at your account right now on the browser and I see 274 followers. Not sure why your seeing something different...

@trinsec sure, I have left overs, next meal I'll take a picture.

The spinal cord and the major bones are not hair like, those I remove when im prepping the fish. What tends to be left are very tiny but noticeable bones, when you cook them it makes the food look hairy. Keep in mind its rather specific to sardines as most other fish dont really have as many tiny bones. You wont get it with salmon for example.

So for dinner I finally went with sardines, mackerel, and brown rice as the base, with equal weight fish to rice, so VERY dense in fish.. the sauce was lemon-soy-walnuts (blended to a paste), a little sesame oil and crushed red pepper.

It was amazing, no complains. Only thing is sardines have these hair like bones, you dont notice them when eating it but it makes them look "hairy".. so their kind of a cheap fish and makes the dish look a bit less appealing even though it doesnt effect texture or taste.

@lucifargundam if the fish was sushi-prepared sure.. never eat regular fish as sushi. Sushi fish is frozen in such a way to kill parasites while still being raw. If you eat normal raw fish you stand a pretty good chance of getting a parasite.

hmm what to make for dinner today.. i have soooo much fish to use so clearly a fish dish.

The fish I have to work with: Mackerel, sardines, octopus (4 lbs), squid, eel (canned and fresh).. i went through my veggies fast as hell so gonna have to work with basically peppers and broccolini...

I'm thinking I might wing it and do something with wasabi and lemon as a base for a white sauce, and maybe a bit of brown rice and the veggies as sides...

Interesting fact of the day: Sharks have existed on the planet longer than trees.

Faith in humanity lost... glitter bombing and exposing scammers, as well as hacking their SSTV. Love what this guy did but man the fact that these scammers are ok doing what they do is depressing.

https://youtu.be/VrKW58MS12g

@icedquinn @djsumdog @giantbug @alexey

But keep in mind ebola is a much more novel disease. The outbreak just a few years back was the first time it ever spread throughout any significant population. Before that it was always stopped early when it crossed over.

@icedquinn
Very true, comparing those specific viruses one is deadly but harder to catch, the other spreads like crazy but isnt likely to kill any one oerson.. yet either can do comparable damage when you consider how much.more easily ebola is contained

@djsumdog @giantbug @alexey

@bonifartius
100% agree with your stance

@icedquinn

he explained it last time he made that claim, and to some extent I see that, he said something like he meant deadly as how many cells it kills how fast.. which to me seemed like a horribly non-technical measure considering some dont kill many cells but still kill you, so why does that even matter?

@djsumdog @giantbug @alexey

@alexey

Thats why i didnt use covid and i explicitly ruled out novel viruses, we dont have enough good data to make these statements.

Everything I said was about viruses that have been researched for many decades with more than ample high quality data.

@icedquinn @djsumdog @giantbug

@anonymoose lol good point.

@icedquinn

Lets take some specific samples of actual data to show why this is completely false.

Rabies is one of the most deadly non-novel viruses we know.. close to 100% of people who get this disease die without a vaccine. No virus compares in terms of percentage chance of death (in all cases we assume no vaccine of course).

Despite how deadly it is there are several diseases with as large or lower an R0.. in other words it spreads faster than many less deadly diseases. For example "swine flu" has almost the exact same rate of spread (R0) yet doesnt even have a morality rate of 1% at somewhere around 0.3%. Avian flu was about 63% deadly and yet had much lower R0 despite being less deadly at an R0 of 1 (it didnt really spread much at all).

To pick another example seasonal flu kills about 0.1% of people and has a R0 of about 2.6, yet there are tons of diseases that spread faster and are far more deadly such as: HIV (Mort: treated 2.5%, untreated: 80%, R0: 3.5), Lyme disease (mort: 0.25%, R0: 3.9), Dengue Fever (mort: 5%, R0 5), Tuberculosis (mort 66%, R0 5.5), Mumps (mort 2%, R0 12.3), and many many others.

Long story short, it may sound valid, but you cant just make things up and assume their true you have to look at the data. The fact is when you look at the data this assertion is a complete myth.

@djsumdog @giantbug

@icedquinn

Because it is naive to a whole host of complexeties... For example, since we are talking generally, most viruses are infectious **before** symtpoms and by the time symptoms present you are no longer in the infectious stage. But if it kills you it will kill you in the stage where you show symptoms. Somtimes you are slightly infectious when you have symptoms but much reduced and not when most of the spread happens... This is true for corona-class viruses (not just THE coronavirus).

As such even a virus that is 100% deadly it would spread exactly the same and at the same rate as the same virus if it were 0% deadly.

Most importantly while it may make sense by the sound of it if you simply look at the correlation between a viruses morbidity and its R0 (how fast it spreads) you will find deadlier viruses that are not novel do **not** have a lower R0, which directly disproves his assertion.

@djsumdog @giantbug

Stolen, lol.

#programming #computers #computerscience #math #maths #mathematics