Show newer

Clarke's Three laws (#2 is my favorite):

1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.

2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.

3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

@lucifer
I think he is less of a troll and more of just an idiot. He oikely beleives this stupidity.
@nosat

@nosat

Im juat glad your so stupid its unlikely youll ever reproduce, carrt on.

@nosat
You can literally see lower pressure by walking up a mountain even when there is no wind. My god are you really this stupid, impressive.

@nosat
A barometer and quite easily measured, happens all the time in nature any time a gas or fluid moves. I really doubt your smart enough to bother to learn/see though.

@nosat
Nope, ove literally measured this stuff directly myself, which ia why your such a joke, you coukd easily prove yourself wrong if you bothered

@nosat
Plenty examples of both. Not my fault you are too much of an idiot to understand.

So apparently the company I'm consulting for was in the news here in Israel and there was a very brief mention of me. It said... (automated translation)

"... and brought to Israel a great American expert in mathematical processing and algorithm - shows that they understood that there were problems."

I found that kinda cool.

I also appeared in the background on TV when they were filming the office which was also fun to see.

@icedquinn

Guns dont bother me at all in the USA, I feel safer knowing they are there.

That said I will say this, when im in the USA it feels more like an overflowing under managed mental hospital.

@Ccom

@Ccom Its an exaggeration, but I get where your coming from and not that far from reality really in some ways.

umans who can't read more than a few paragraphs are quite unintelligent in communication... 

@freeschool While I do agree being able to read long form is a sign of more intelligent people I think this also works against your favor.

I'd argue an intelligent person should be able to explain things simply and shortly without loosing any information. So I'd say that people who are "long winded" and produce longer text than is needed to explain an idea is less intelligent than people who can explain things most succinctly.

Of course the devil is in the details int he end.

making a minimalist dbus clone
gonna call it
shortbus
:blobcatcooljazz:
Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.