Show newer

@kravietz up until 10 months ago this would have gotten the shop owner jail time.

@jaysonmassey No nothing in tbe rest of tbe amendment imposes limits. Tbe rest of the amendment simply explains why jt is neccesary that gun rights not be infringed.

No its not ok for the president or congress to limit it short of writing and passing an amendment itself, which thry never dis.

Not sure why your saying it woukd be ok to limit if my saying was true or what it has to do with slavery, not following you on that part.

@ech when I spoke i meant to say Assault Weapon Ban not Assault Rifle Ban which makes no sense as you and I both pointed out ;)

@trz4747@mstdn.social Assault rifles are clearly defined, stop trying to twist things and play the weasly approach, say things fair and straight. Its NOT an assault rifle, that is well defined, full stop.

You want to be taken seriously on an Assault weapon ban you really have to stop playing tbise games. Comes across as bad faith and paints you as uninformed on the subject.

@ech

AR-15 is categorically not an assault rifle by definition (It isnt fully automatic).

"Assault WEAPON" however, a term mostly fabricated by dems and has no real useful meaning, that ohrase is intended to be used with any weapon that suits their agenda of the day.

@trz4747@mstdn.social

@pj @thatguyoverthere @admitsWrongIfProven @mike805 @lmrocha

In tbis case im refering to the fact that he is just trolling at this point. Earlier it wasnt bad faith... but also no important, he isnt doing anything wrong.

@pj

I have no real issue with admits. Like yea its bad faith argument but nothing so vile that i had to raise ajy real issues.

@thatguyoverthere @admitsWrongIfProven @mike805 @lmrocha

@trz4747@mstdn.social @strawd

No insaid based on how you descrbed them tbry soubdnlike a bias source. I admit that until i dig deeper i cant confirm that.

@trz4747@mstdn.social @strawd

I am using selling to mean ,
"Has a desire tonconvince people.of anparticular viewpoint, and in doing so omita known facts that might act to be contrary in convincing people of the main narrative"

@trz4747@mstdn.social @strawd

No not everyone. But yes the vast majority of people that have commited to selling a specific viewpoint is bias. But no you have people who arent bias and will represent both sides of an argument faithfully.

@trz4747@mstdn.social @strawd if yiu are trying tonsell one side of an argument, then you are bias. It hardly is limited to financial kotivations you are right it doesnt mean having an opinion, but it does imply a commitment to an opinion and a desire to sell that opinion above other opinions.

@trz4747@mstdn.social

Doesnt change the fact that he is explicitly bias and not a neutral party one would expect unbias data from. There is an agenda in play.

@strawd

@trz4747@mstdn.social

Sounds like a recipie for bias if he is fighting for gu control. Not a good source if the intention is unbiased facts. For that you want someone who is neutral on regulation.

@strawd

With an exit velocity of 3000 ft/sec you might think that is true. But bullets slow down fast. The fjrst 26" is non linear but aftrr that thr bullet slows down rather lineraly at 111 ft/sec per foot. So by the time it strikes a targrt it is well below the velocity in which cavitation can occur. Thus why its used on small game, by the tine it hits its realtively under powedered.

@niclas

Its common and cheap here. The yolks are suprisi gly creamy and good but the amonia smell is a bit of a put off. So im not sure how i feel.

@bonifartius

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.