🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@realcaseyrollins Ha! that might actually be true...

@bluGill lol yea i mean their only slightly less cookie at best :)

@admitsWrongIfProven At this point i probably wouldnt mind just a random lottery for president :)

@EyalL

Spoken in the usual politicial tone, and not hard commit... but yea, I agree, its a threat, and not a great job at being subtle, despite the attempt.

@RenewedRebecca @georgetakei

@EyalL

For anyone following the thread here is are the specific quotes being used to claim that the republicans are threatening to impeach, I will let the quotes speak for themselves:

"Elections have consequence and the fact that, a couple days after the swearing in, people are already talking about impeachment really makes impeachment seem like it's something that's more casual or cavalier than it should be,"

"The idea that we're going to immediately start an impeachment process is probably too radical. I want to look and see, does she recuse herself on cases where she is prejudged? That to me is something that is at the oath of office and what she said she was going to do to uphold the Constitution. That, to me, is a serious offense."

@RenewedRebecca @georgetakei

@EyalL

Thanks so much, appreciate you finding that, ill read now.

@RenewedRebecca @georgetakei

@winstonsmith As I said, you already responded to show you knew you were wrong... so im satisfied, bye.

@winstonsmith Ahh when you cant make any logical sense, just resort to personal attacks...

Thanks, this is the point I know you realize you are clueless... i mean i know you cant admit you are wrong, but this is effectively the same thing.

@winstonsmith

No not just the USA the definition is the same in most countries.. just as the legal definition you posted earlier completely agreed with what I said, youd find that to be true in the legal definition of most countries with pyramid scheme laws.

@winstonsmith So? A concept with is a super set does not need to preceed the existance of a subset... thats not how logic works. Which came first is irrelevant... its even less irrelevant since we are talking about a legal definition, not a common definition.

@winstonsmith WHEN an MLM is an investment scam, then it is a pyramid scheme... An MLM that is not an investment scam is not... this isnt complicated.

@VoxDei You very well could be right sadly.

@winstonsmith

That depends on the MLM. A pyramid scheme is a type of MLM where the primary source of income is investors... so if you have a MLM that is primarly that, then it is a pyramid scheme, but a MLM is not automatically a pyramid scheme. If and when they have real products that are sold then they are not, by legal definition.

@winstonsmith It is virtually word for word what I said... a scheme where the primary source of money is getting new tiers of investors rather than selling a product.... read the law you posted again nearly exactly what I said:

that, to many participants in the scheme, constitutes primarily an opportunity to buy or sell an investment opportunity, whether personally or through an agent, rather than an opportunity to buy or supply goods or services; and