what you just said "yes jeff, thank you for simplifying that for me" :)
You're welcome.
@wardrup well if your running off a properly maintained DB with backups and all that shouldnt be an issue, and it should rarely if ever corrupt I would think...
But yea one reason using a service that can download from LoTW is largely because i want to feel my logs are secure even if i loose everything .
Why not reduce it to what they really mean "Everyone who disagrees with me is the same and wrong, my idea is the only unique one and im brilliant cause i finally solved the worlds problems but no one will listen to me because they refuse to accept the earth is flat!"
@Raccoon ahh yea, i mean, someone is likely paying ... but yea its also probably remarkably cheap despite the firepower.
This right now is actually my top choice... I wanted TLF as i wanted a CLI tool... but as far as I can tell TLF cant **download** from any service only upload... so im likely to to go with cloud log.
I bought a 1 month subscription to test it and see if I like it enough to commit... if I do I will likely put in the effort to dockerize it and host it.
@Raccoon Very possibly very little... bot nets tend to be trojened computers... someone released a virus once and are using zombie computers... the virus spreads so costs no money to maintain.
Only way it costs money is if someone is paying to "rent" it, which is likely the case... but even then considering its illegal bandwidth with no material costs it is likely a lot cheaper than you think.
Wouldnt be the first time :)
Plot twist: the other 50% of the day is you putting objects up their other holes :)
In all seriousness though nurses and to a lesser extent doctors (depends on the doctor) are the real heroes!
@ndz been trying that,, seems a bit clunky and not really a huge fan.. feels lacking and just archaic UI... Right now im considering CloudLog and/or tlf maybe.
@Clementulus When workers exercise their right to strike, does the employer have the right and option to fire them and hire new employees, and second question, if not can they hire scabs as temporary workers to replace them?
I understand your other points.. but this is relevant for me to form an opinion. Obviously forcing striking workers to go back to work seems a violation of rights.. but then again if the company is not legally allowed to fire them or hire scabs thent hat is a violation of the rights of the company too... so i need this information to reconcile if i think such an action might be motivated, no matter how reasonable the ask... i mean you cant force the company to accept the terms ethically either, so yea...
@realcaseyrollins Think a space elevator would be bad for society or something? Or is there a joke int here that went over my head?
While I have no doubt it would require an unreasonable amount of material and resources, so not doable... I wonder.... would a space-elevator made out of modern materials, but shapped like a pyramid with a broad base, be able to be made tall enough to extend into space. I figure if the base is wide enough and the materials at least as strong as solid rock, it should be possible... but without running the numbers I dunno... I do know there is a limit on the maximum size of a mountain so .... i dunno.
Internet has no answers.
> sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_083892.pdf also
>
> USA had a massive spike in homicides rates. More than Canada. And the USA not banned guns.
uhhh what are you even arguing for here?
That would be like this conversation:
Scientist: "We see the death rate in every country increases once COVID-19 is introduced intot he country. Therefore we can conclude COVID-19 will increase the mortality rate of the country"
You: "But look, this one time in solenea we see the death rate increased and there were no COVID cases in the whole country... this makes your argument very suspicious, maybe COVID doesnt kill people"
The logic makes no sense... the fact that a pattern is born out and consistent is not invalidated simply because things other than guns can and have influenced these rates in the past... thats the very reason we look at multiple examples (and why i looked at every country in europe and around the world not just one)... its also why we use cause-effect tests and not correlation, to ensure we are limiting our scope to events related to guns and not other potential unrelated causes.
> Maybe you are correct, but I had to study a lot of stats, before being sure.
As well you should... But at least for the moment given the facts that have been presented in this thread, I think its clear my point is the one that is reasoned and fact based... that may change if you have new evidence, but clearly this evidence points to only one conclusion an objective person could make based on what we have said so far and argued.
> sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_083892.pdf also
>
> USA had a massive spike in homicides rates. More than Canada. And the USA not banned guns.
uhhh what are you even arguing for here?
That would be like this conversation:
Scientist: "We see the death rate in every country increases once COVID-19 is introduced intot he country. Therefore we can conclude COVID-19 will increase the mortality rate of the country"
You: "But look, this one time in solenea we see the death rate increased and there were no COVID cases in the whole country... this makes your argument very suspicious, maybe COVID doesnt kill people"
The logic makes no sense... the fact that a pattern is born out and consistent is not invalidated simply because things other than guns can and have influenced these rates in the past... thats the very reason we look at multiple examples (and why i looked at every country in europe and around the world not just one)... its also why we use cause-effect tests and not correlation, to ensure we are limiting our scope to events related to guns and not other potential unrelated causes.
> Maybe you are correct, but I had to study a lot of stats, before being sure.
As well you should... But at least for the moment given the facts that have been presented in this thread, I think its clear my point is the one that is reasoned and fact based... that may change if you have new evidence, but clearly this evidence points to only one conclusion an objective person could make based on what we have said so far and argued.
In fact you only have to look at the numbers.... Significant hand gun bans in canada were enacted in 1966 with bill C-150 .. these banned many types of guns and got quite a few guns, particularly hand guns used in self defense, off the streets.
What was the result to homicide rate? well lets look at a chart...
Well look at that, the homicide rate goes through the roof, doubling for about a decade (just as i suggest)... and while it does start to decrease eventually it never falls below pre-ban levels... meaning a lot of peopel died over very very many decades due to this policy.
> I have no access to the other statistics about the rise of homicides in case of ban of the guns. So if you have some link, I will read.
Thats why i provided the data for you to see as a chart. The source is clearly listed for the data, you are welcome to go to the source and check it if you'd like.
While we are at it,a nd just to show im not cherry picking... lets address the OP with regard to canada, two topics you both picked so I cant be the one cherry picking here...
So canada a long time ago banned a lot of types of guns, but you can still in some cases get a license if you have a strong need. So handguns still had some use as self defense among a privilaged class.... But they never required training to get a license... Training to obtain a firearm license was enacted by Canada and passed into law in 2014 as an additional restriction on getting a license and a gun. This of course limited access to guns or at least put a barrier in front of it reducing the number of guns on the street...
So what did this relatively minor restriction due to the violent crime rates... well yet again, a restriction on access to guns caused a **skyrocketing** of crime rates. See the chart attached.
As is clear despite violent crimes being well on the decline the day the training requirement law passed we see a huge and continued upward spike in violent crime rates. On that appears to be continuing to climb....
Seems even your example of Canada shows quite clearly banning guns kills people.
While we are at it,a nd just to show im not cherry picking... lets address the OP with regard to canada, two topics you both picked so I cant be the one cherry picking here...
So canada a long time ago banned a lot of types of guns, but you can still in some cases get a license if you have a strong need. So handguns still had some use as self defense among a privilaged class.... But they never required training to get a license... Training to obtain a firearm license was enacted by Canada and passed into law in 2014 as an additional restriction on getting a license and a gun. This of course limited access to guns or at least put a barrier in front of it reducing the number of guns on the street...
So what did this relatively minor restriction due to the violent crime rates... well yet again, a restriction on access to guns caused a **skyrocketing** of crime rates. See the chart attached.
As is clear despite violent crimes being well on the decline the day the training requirement law passed we see a huge and continued upward spike in violent crime rates. On that appears to be continuing to climb....
Seems even your example of Canada shows quite clearly banning guns kills people.
So you are telling me his military didnt have guns, and those guns didnt stop unarmed jews from defending themselves?
Thats some significant rewriting of history you got going there. To think hitlers guns and everyone else he invaded not having guns played no role is bull...
You act like unarmed poland or unarmed civilians of other nations just voted him in...
Hell even when he got to power in germany he 1) used guns more than once 2) explicitly used guns to murder his opposition so as to fix the vote 3) used his access to guns to murder and frame someone in the reichstag fire.... yes his use of guns both allowed him to gain power, and to keep it.
Jeffrey Phillips Freeman
Innovator & Entrepreneur in Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computing & Big Data. Avid SCUBA diver, Open-source developer, HAM radio operator, astrophotographer, and anything nerdy.
Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, USA, currently living in Utrecht, Netherlands, USA, and Thailand. Was also living in Israel, but left.
Pronouns: Sir / Mister
(Above pronouns are not intended to mock, i will respect any persons pronouns and only wish pronouns to show respect be used with me as well. These are called neopronouns, see an example of the word "frog" used as a neopronoun here: http://tinyurl.com/44hhej89 )
A proud member of the Penobscot Native American tribe, as well as a Mayflower passenger descendant. I sometimes post about my genealogical history.
My stance on various issues:
Education: Free to PhD, tax paid
Abortion: Protected, tax paid, limited time-frame
Welfare: Yes, no one should starve
UBI: No, use welfare
Racism: is real
Guns: Shall not be infringed
LGBT+/minorities: Support
Pronouns: Will respect
Trump: Moron, evil
Biden: Senile, racist
Police: ACAB
Drugs: Fully legal, no prescriptions needed
GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 8B23 64CD 2403 6DCB 7531 01D0 052D DA8E 0506 CBCE