🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@freepeoplesfreepress

The UN wont because Israel has intentionally and beligerantly told them to F-off.

The UN has on countless occasions accused israel of war crimes and terrorism and demanded they be heard in the international courts and yet they have refused to do their duty and even show.

What do you want of them to beg until the UN changes side and supports Israel and then all of a sudden be ok with it. If you care about the UN then hold them accountable for the resolutions **already** decided. Once they man up and go to international court and found innocent maybe then the UN might be willing to hear their side, but until then frankly I dont think they should have a voice. They are a bit like a fugative at this point, when you refuse to go to court for your previous trials you cant expect to have a voice now that they feel their the victim.

@realcaseyrollins @kravietz

@realcaseyrollins

I am not sure you did explain it... in fact im rather confused how you can disagree at all.. like they dont even pass laws or decrees, they talk, and then some small set (or large) number of countries may sign a thing.There are no rules on votes needed or anything like that that would even resemble a law. When they vote it is basically "who wants to sign this thing" and sometimes the condition for signing may be a threshold number of votes, but its decided on a per-discussion basis and non-signing countries are never obligated, explicitly so.

@freepeoplesfreepress @kravietz

@thor I do yes, though I took what you said to mean digestion and not the pancreas which i dont usually see people refer to it that way is all.

@thor now you're sounding like you're saying back what i said to me

@realcaseyrollins

Agreed, which is why the fact that Israel has been called to international court multiple times on war crimes, human rights violations, and terrorism is so damning. More so since they refuse to defend themselves in court.

So in that regard I wish the UN would act.

But they wont because there is no international law, there is no enforcement, they cant act, they arent a government. It is up to the individual countries to choose to act or not when the UN decrees a thing.

@freepeoplesfreepress @kravietz

@thor actually seems more closely related to insulin, blood surgar, and ketosis.

Sopecifically if i am at or near ketosis hunger goes away.

@thor The advantage is when y ou eat healthy you are hungry less, I notice that for sure.

For me the effect is more than most. If I eat low carbs for a few weeks I feel great, never all that hungry.. But then just one night of a heavy carb meal like pasta and i wake the next day feeling like im starving and takes a day or two to go back to normal.

@freepeoplesfreepress

The UN **caused** the problem, while I expect them to be responsible for fixing it in reality they wont.

@realcaseyrollins @kravietz

@thor I am pretty well off with money and even for me when I go healthy the price is so high I notice it.

@thor I dunno aggrculture can be pretty healthy.. i mean think of all the leafy greens we harvest, plants that cant even grow in the wild anymore.

The issue isnt that aggriculture is unhealthy, its that maximizing caloric density is unhealthy, and that only comes from overpopulation. With healthy populations farms dont need to hyperfocus on carbs as much since there are more resources (land) for fewer people.

@thor ironically thats a preatty healthy diet for anyone... the fact that healthy diets are generally quite expensive is in and of itself an issue. Double so if its more life threatening than usual as is the case with diabeties.

@realcaseyrollins

Well thats fair. I do often pick my words carefully and expect people to read my words carefully. Most people dont. But i give people the benefit of the doubt that they can ask or i can clarify and then they will interprit me more how I intend.

So while I do understand the distinction getting lost at first once I was explicit about the distinction then its on you to recognize the mis communication and moving foward be more aware of the distinction I am trying to convey.

@kravietz

@PonyPanda @kravietz

#1 im not sure if russia directly encourages them. More likely it would have been indirect through Iran, a mutual ally.

@realcaseyrollins

If someone wont care about a distinction that they should care about, and intentionally misunderstand me or misinterprit then thats on them, I care very little.

The fact is these two are hugely different things to anyone being honest with themselves. So if you treat them as the same then thats your problem, not mine.

As for 911, no we didnt bring it on ourselves. But we did make it a point to ensure we responded exactly the way the terrorists wanted and literally fell in line and immediately let the terrorists win.

@kravietz

@realcaseyrollins

The line is pretty damn thick the two arent even remotely related.

If i jump in the water with weights on im going to drown thats to be expected... no one in their right mind would think because I said that it is "close" to saying "people who swim with weights on deserve to die".

More so when i explain clearly and repeatidly the distinction.

No worry this isnt a misinterpretation i can give a pass on when it is belligerent.

@kravietz

@freepeoplesfreepress

> Dear Dr. Freemo: Israel has the legitimate right to defend it's homeland against Hamas

If they had a homeland sure, they dont... all they have is someone elses homeland they invaded and squated on.. They do **not** have a right to defend someone elses homeland as their own that they stole.

> , Israel has the right to counter attack Hamas for war crimes committed against the Jewish People there is no disagreement

No not when those jewish people are invaders in someone elses land they dont.

> The National Government of Israel is committing atrocities against the Palestinian People.

As an illegitimate government, but yea, they are.

> Palestinians already live in overcrowded conditions at best,

Not before the invasion they werent. It was only after israel invaded they took 2/3 of the land murdered most of the people and moved the rest into perminant 80 year long concentration camps with walls. They even continually and intentionally turned off their water and power during times of peace as punishment.

Calling an open-air concentration camp that the israelis created as simply "overcrowded" is an under statement.

> Palestinians are being caught in the cross fire between the aggressors Hamas and victims the Jewish People.

You cant call a group of people who literally invaded palestinian home land, people who have **no** claim of any kind to the land, as not being the aggressor. PAlestine attacked israeli aggressor on **their** land, land stolen from them. Calling it israels land is dishonest to what happened.

> Everyone knows that in modern times militaries during war campaigns are supposed to try to protect innocent civilians where humanly possible from being injured and killed.

Agreed

> IDF knows that Hamas has deliberately blocked Palestinians from escaping and fleeing from war torn areas

No we dont, all sources on this have come from ISrael or its allys. Unless something changed I tried really hard to confirm this just a few weeks ago in a puiblic discussion from any neutral source and every source we found at the time explicitly stated they could not confirm this.

Even if it is true, as I've said I dont deny the Hamas has commited war crimes, and they are wrong. But I have pointed out for every war crime hamas has commited there is one we can show ISrael commited. Worse yet when israel commits a war crime the death toll is usually 10x higher.

You say they blocked civilians, even if we take that at face value, Israel has cut off water and electricity in peace time to mass-murder entire palestinian populations, and was even called to international court on it for war crimes and refused to show.

So at best you can say they both commit war crimes and as such that isnt an argument for either side.

So this accusation may or may not be true.

> The Israel - Hamas War is truly a humanitarian crisis of epic proportions. 2 Million Palestinians with no escape from relentless attacks from opposing military armed forces. If this is not an active case of genocide what is?

Literally cutting off large parts of entire countries from water, food, and electricity during peace time... and doing so over an 80 year period.. id say thats far far more of a genocide than a road that was blockaided **maybe** for nebulous reasons.

@realcaseyrollins @kravietz

@admin

Ha!

@admitsWrongIfProven @wjmaggos

@realcaseyrollins

It isnt the same logic and it isnt a justification and I have repeated this several times now.

Saying something is **Expected** is not the same as saying it is **justified**. The world is unfair, you should expect LOTS of unjustified things to happy, and many times you can predict (expect) what they are.

@kravietz

@realcaseyrollins

The palestinians were largely nomadic people and did not seem to have much interest in establishing governments. They wanted to live on the land and be free, and ffrankly it worked great for them for quite a while.

The palestinian government only needed to organize much later in history once they were already under attack.

Its also irrelevant, what matters is who has citizenship over the land and a say in how its run (people born there).. whether they choose to organize into a government to do so or not means very little.

@kravietz