Show newer

@LouisIngenthron this is actually a common argument by law scholars and has a name .. i just cant remember what its called right now

@LouisIngenthron

Complexity != readability. I am ok with it being thurough, the issue is more with it being hard to understand with certainty.

The fact that even a lawyer cant tell you ahead of time with certainty if something is legal or not, you need to find out in court, says a lot

@LouisIngenthron Its better than not having it. but it hints at a fundementally flawed system. Laws should be understandable by the average p[erson

@thatguyoverthere

Maybe. but since you didnt link it I can only speculate. Either way dont know what link you even mean.

@niclas @roboneko

@thatguyoverthere

It was probably someone I had blocked then, as Im not going hunting for it either. Either way I dont recall seeing a link.

@niclas @roboneko

@thatguyoverthere

> Part of the problem is that you like to pretend you are an expert in just about every field but struggle to spell so I have to think you are mostly full of shit.

And yet I am a published scientists where a few moments searching for my name will lnet you 20+ published white papers that are peer reviewed. Not to mention my appearances on TV and in the news over the years.

> When someone posted a link to a talk by Milton Friedman you wanted no part of an actual fact based discussion. Funny that.

Dont recall any such link or discussion, feel free to link it.

> I've learned quite a bit in other discussions around here. You just think I should accept you as a person of superior intellect and therefore correct by default.

I couldnt care less if you learn from me or view me as an expert in the least. I do care that your an idiot, I called you out for being an idiot, and now your crying foul and trying to paint the narrative im the idiot... Thats some impressive projection you got going there.

@niclas @roboneko

@eleland

Why are you still talking about this? It was stated in no uncertain terms after the miscommunication what was meant, so now we all know what I intended to ask was not answered... so why are you wasting time on this at all? Either answer the question or dont, I already know the answer, they have **never** put forward a federal constitutional amendment, despite there being quite a few proposed to outlaw abortion.

@stevesilberman

@thatguyoverthere

I never said that you flip out on everyone who disagrees with you. Just the ones that point out you dont even have the level of understanding of a high school student yet you insist you have a clue.

No no, I get it you have a fragile little ego and when people call you out on acting like you know a subject you clearly dont that ego comes crashing down.

I've never once seen you actually bother to learn a thing from anyone, you just double down and pretend you know what your saying then get upset when someone points out you dont.

I mean for fucks sake last time you lost your shit when I told you I spent 5 years raising ducks because you thought you were some expert on ducks... its pretty fucking hilarious dude.

@niclas @roboneko

@thatguyoverthere

No I dont want you to block me, its just an obvious solution to all your woes, a much better one than the fool you've made of yourself up until now.

@niclas @roboneko

@thatguyoverthere

Right, we all saw your little tantrum about how you were sooooo upset someone had an opinion and expressed it despite you not wanting to debate.

Oh, and the irony of you thinking I expect you to modify your behavior for me when you were literally upset someone discussed a thing you didnt want to discuss on the internet.

@niclas @roboneko

@thatguyoverthere

Wonderful, then do yourself a favor and block me. Or just kindly ask me to unfollow you or not comment, that works too.

I hope you see the idiocy though of saying you dont want to debate something and then think that is meant to imply other people a=cant express their opinions.. dont debate, others can comment as they wish. If you dont want to debate and then **you** decide to get into one anyway, thats on you. Your a big boy, you dont have to respond if you dont want to. Well I guess your not a big boy, but I thought you were.

@niclas @roboneko

@thatguyoverthere

Then sounds like you should either block me or stop making posts public if thats your problem. Will go a lot farther than your little tantrums.

@niclas @roboneko

@thatguyoverthere

I really dont care if you follow me or not, just dont complain about it if you do... I follow you because your tantrums are your problem not mine. I point them out because of the absurdity of you having tantrums over a person with an opinion that you actually follow.

As long as you not following me stops the tantrums and makes you happier, then yes I am glad you did it.

@niclas @roboneko

(137/200)

When looking at short term memory, a portion of it is the active working memory.

One way to look at the active working memory is like matrix multiplication.

Let's say one gets a 5 digit number. It is fairly simple to return that number in the same order as given, which would equate to the identity matrix.

If one had to invert the order of number, then the diagonal of the matrix would be flipped compared to the identity matrix, so equating to a negative determinant.

Now imagine if one had to do more complex calculations like ordering the months of the year alphabetically. Creating a matrix that transposes the months vector is initially not that simple, though once instantiated, it becomes quite simple to repeat.

Depending on how many row alterations are needed, starting from the identity matrix could be a way to quantify the complexity of the task.

Show thread

@critical because even when companies disolve their ip is the property of someone else. In fact this would be illegal as youd be devaluing your IP and investors would be unable to try to make money off liquidating what is left.

If you wanted to do this ethically and legally youd have to buy up the companys ip when they lkquidate at auction then open sojrce it yourself.

@thatguyoverthere

And yet you follow me, reply and engage despite not liking it, and even after a tantrum about not wanting to discuss with me continue to tag me..

Attention seeking much?

@niclas @roboneko

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.