🎓 Dr. Freemo 🇳🇱 @freemo@social.cleverlibre.org

@flexghost If states can keep third parties off the ballot then this is fair game.

The day I see ballots where all parties get an equal shake will be the day I cry over someone being denied access to the ballot fromt he top two parties.

@wjmaggos

I didnt ask for proof, I asked for evidence.

So if your saying there are things which reasonably and objectively suggest this, then its valid. If there is enough of it to draw a conclusion, its valid.

I wouldnt put it past Trump, I even kinda expect him to be guilty. But its purely speculative unless you can list some evidence.

In the case of OJ he fled from the cops, there was blood in his car that matched the victim, and tons of pretty solid evidence. There is no evidence even remotely comparable to Trump, feel free to correct me if im wrong.

@volkris

@realcaseyrollins

> I don’t agree, because there are too many “understandings of life”. Everyone doesn’t need to know everything.

Not every student needs to take every class on every subject. But that is vastly different than not offering it at school at all. Obviously not every topic needs to be covered, some might be so obscure as to not be needed. But they would be exluded only because other topics take priority, not because you want to deny someone the chance to learn it.

> We shouldn’t have any of those. I think putting the education about morality and religion into the hands of government-funded institutions is a rather dangerous decision.

Again you arent teaching them what morals to have. You are teaching them all the ways people have evaluated morality and teaching all the varied perspectives to them and giving them the tools to accurately judge morality on their own.

The only time governments teaching kids should be suspect is when they intentionally exclude teaching them about one facet of a topic. So long as the coverage is complete, and teaches how to learn and not what to think, then its good.

Also who said anything about government. Schools can be private schools too, they dont have to be public schools.

> That is the parents’ fault. I will never be one to say “parents do a bad job so the government should parent the kids instead”.

Huh how did we go from "teach them the ways to think critically" to parenting. No one is asking or expecting schools to parent, they should be teaching not parenting.

@SirBemrose @josemanuel

@volpeon Im not sure how i feel about this.. i mean asking for a star for free support is a pretty minimal ask.. but still feels icky.

@stux I can certainly see a video game where you play a doge that needs to escape the "loving" embrace of elon by chewing his face off :)

@realcaseyrollins

Also, lets face it the overwhelming majority of people are completely incapable of critical thinking and understanding. Parents do a pretty horrible job at teaching kids critical thinking skills, most just want to indoctrinate and brain wash their kids to believe what they believe, free thinking is the last thing most parents want from their kids. Hell some parents might even punish you for disagreeing with them if their strict.

@SirBemrose @josemanuel

Lawl

#Twitter #X #Xitter

@realcaseyrollins

I would argue that school is **not** about teaching facts at all, it is about

1) teaching kids how to learn
2) Getting kids to **understand** the world.

Their ability to recognize facts will come as an extension of those two, but is not directly what should be taught.

That said, yes school should teach **every** understanding of life... We have philosophy class to teach about morals, sex ed to teach us about reproductive systems and how they work, history, the arts... I mean what is it schools **shouldnt** teach a kid to understand, I frankly cant think of anything. Hell we even have classes that teach about religion.

@SirBemrose @josemanuel