Show newer

LOL oh the irony of someone insisting they get the last word and using it to tell the other person how they need to get the last word.

Who the fuck is so ass backwards to even **care** who speaks last, like how is that a thing that matters. When your done talking, walk away, its not complicated.

Maaaannnn I need to get back to the depths of the ocean ASAP. I am writing up a gameplan to make sure I can get back to diving half of the year again. I think my back might finally be good enough to start pushing it again.

Love, true love, seperate from lust, attraction, and romance, just pure distilled love is an extremely painful and difficult thing to learn. But once you understand it more than repays for itself.

Today I learned you can cook raw egg in the microwave... no more of this using a pan business for me, my life will never be the same!

@freemo I don't knowwwwww...as a strongly pro life guy j hate the idea of people needlessly dying. Civil wars gets this whole thing over with but I just don't think it's worth the human bloodshed

The CSS on this article post is absolutely beautiful in its simplicity. I love simple CSS that still is feature rich and doesnt look like a plain text dump. This is lovely!

labri.fr/perso/nrougier/GTD/in

@freemo
some context for @stux :-
This black kitty I found starving and afraid in the back of my house. I kept and fed him for three days (this was the first ever cat I kept) while searching someone who can adopt him.
Now he lives happily with his adopter.

An antique I just purchased. It is a page from a handwritten bible from 1480 (yes, 541 years old). It is in latin, with ornate capitals, and amazingly the red is still very vibrant and the gold gilding on the Q very much in tact.

For those interested it is the Book of Hours psalms.

I decided to take some extremely high resolution scans before sealing it in some acrylic and prepare it to be framed. Will put it on my wall tomorrow.

An antique I just purchased. It is a page from a handwritten bible from 1480 (yes, 541 years old). It is in latin, with ornate capitals, and amazingly the red is still very vibrant and the gold gilding on the Q very much in tact.

For those interested it is the Book of Hours psalms.

I decided to take some extremely high resolution scans before sealing it in some acrylic and prepare it to be framed. Will put it on my wall tomorrow.

Great biodiversity project!

Restor restor.eco, a science-based open data platform, bringing transparency and ecological insights to restoration efforts around the world.

@TWCrowther@twitter.com's TED talk: ted.com/talks/thomas_crowther_
Interview by @TEDchris@twitter.com: podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcast/

@freemo @ejg I agree with what @freemo points out. People get outraged about how rich somebody is. And that is true. Except huge part of that wealth is only on paper in the fluctuating value of financial (and other assets). But nobody pays taxes over their net worth increases, we pay taxes from realised income.

Anyhow, these concepts have issues. For instance where I live, it can happen that you own say 50 shares of a startup (let it be 50%) which is worth 1000 bucks starting capital, then the next day investor comes along, buys another half for 1Mio bucks and the third day you have the tax office on your neck to pay taxes from a wealth increase (income) of 999k bucks, while all along your cash position did not change at all.

What I am trying to point out is this: Whenever people complain about rich people not paying tax on their wealth increases, the real question to them should be:
1. So how exactly will you legislate it so as not to harm everybody along the way?
2. And suppose if we all pay taxes even over wealth increases which are only on paper (because the stock you own or control went up due to market fluctuations, or geopolitics), what will we do when next year a person's net worth actually decreases? Will the tax office reimburse us, or what?

These are just headlines to cause outrage, nothing else. What actually helps is to tighten up the laws about income taxation and also classification what constitutes income and what does not. If e.g., Bezos has a salary of 1000 bucks and that's all he lives off, he shall pay taxes as a 1k income guy. But if he besides that lives in a house owned by Amazon Inc, drives a car owned by Amazon Inc. and flies Amazon-owned aircraft in his private capacity, then those effects should be counted as his income too. There are countries where this is sorted (at least on smaller scale) better.

Man its really annoying to see people constantly make up this whole "rich people dont pay taxes" nonsense.. If you review their actual tax records you'll see Elon paid about 1/3 of his income as taxes and Bezos about 1/4, which is actually quite high. But yea lets just make shit up instead and manipulate the numbers to show some "true" tax rate that is really just some fantasy as close to 0 as we can distort, cant just make up fake numbers and think its useful to addressing any problems that might exist.

@freemo copyright lower left 1897 (yes, people were trying to copyright something that is essentially the golden rule that far back)

@freemo Oh, I do still have it, I just hadn't pushed it anywhere in a long time

gitlab.com/dustyweb/org-diet/

Here you go!

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.