We have a winner! "Enshittification" is our Word of the Week of the Year for 2023. And we have an interview with @pluralistic who coined the word.
It's all in a special live episode with our friends.
Video and audio here, or wherever you get podcasts:
http://becauselanguage.com/89-words-of-the-week-of-the-year-2023/
@JoeUchill @GossiTheDog Oh, I figured that would be called Grokchain (probably some hideously inefficient AI implementation via smart contracts) and then you sell it to Elon Musk, since it would be peak techbro.
@vicgrinberg Wow, that looks like a serious operation!
Finished A City on Mars, by Kelly and @ZachWeinersmith. Very funny, well researched, and still approachable. You don't expect the most reasonable text on space settlement to come from a Weinersmith but here we are!
A silent night in Bethlehem. https://apnews.com/article/e408a3e48d18c69a7a0b018505cdc732
@rdviii I can tell you that I use a different one for GitHub, suggesting that you can use any authentication app that implements standard TOTP (which is defined by RFC 6238). A few apps I've seen recommended are Duo, Authy, and Aegis. I've used Authy and it does the job with no annoyances I've encountered (just make sure you disable adding additional devices to your account if you don't immediately need to do so) or you could go with something like Aegis if you prefer open source.
@filipw I was really excited to see the wider adoption of #Webauthn for #authentication online to facilitate really strong authentication for those who wanted it, but unfortunately I feel like the #Passkey hype will undermine that and instead push the industry to adopt a less secure option that works to tie people even more tightly to the walled gardens of a few major players. #2FA
interesting post on passkeys and the problem with resident keys
"How Hype Will Turn Your Security Key Into Junk"
🔗 https://fy.blackhats.net.au/blog/2023-02-02-how-hype-will-turn-your-security-key-into-junk/
@rdviii Which is GitHub's recommended authenticator? It looks like they just use standard TOTP, which case there are lots of options. Or do you mean GitHub Mobile?
The thing about building an "everything" app (payments commerce messaging etc)is that it doesn't work if you won't build it for ~everyone.
Unless you can - for example - get an entire family to use it regardless of their political leaning, you will fail.
An everything app must be as inoffensive and apolitical and non ideological as possible.
Whatsapp. Facebook messenger. Etc.
Musk openly does not want X to be that.
https://joanwestenberg.com/blog/the-everything-app-has-to-work-for-everyone
@albertcardona I think the issue of persistence of conversations will be relevant to such users when they switch devices (since it stinks to lose all the history of your family/friends group chats), and even for not-very -tech-savvy users if they have something like a tablet then the device linking comes up (since this works pretty well with iMessage and even reasonably well with SMS on android). @steveroyle @signalapp
@emmadavidson Right, unless he's also born in the course of the movie, which would be an interesting choice. @drskyskull
@steveroyle @albertcardona @signalapp I honestly have been loathe to try because of certain behaviors of Signal (such as other devices frequently coming unlinked and conversation histories not showing up on other devices) that degrade the user experience, presumably in favor of greater security. If it allowed one to tune some of those behaviors to fit the user's own view of the trade-offs it would make it easier to sell folks on, I think. Of course, I recognize that means extra development work.
@steveroyle @signalapp
@fastmail It has been reported recently that governments are spying on the push notifications sent to users. It sounds like this can be mitigated in multiple ways, including encrypting the contents of push notifications. What measures does #Fastmail take, if any, to ensure the confidentiality of push notifications in its smartphone app?
https://www.wired.com/story/apple-google-push-notification-surveillance/
Something I'm really fascinated by is how AI gets defined in pop culture. I was reading a thread the other day where a student who had used grammarly, and several other machine learning tools, was complaining that a prof dinged them for using AI. The dividing line seemed to be that the AI hadn't done all the work? I've also heard people say "I used AI to write" meaning the AI was prompted. Language change during the next 20 years on this stuff will be interesting.
My Sonoma State FiLES guest lecture, "On Bullshit Engines," is also available to view for free:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DpM_TXq2ws
Reading about a construct I've been wanting to know better for a while: self-compassion!
"one of the advantages of self-compassion over self-esteem is that self-compassion is not based on the performance evaluations of self and others, or on congruence with ideal standards. Rather, self-compassion circumvents the entire self-evaluation process altogether (positive or negative), focusing instead on feelings of kindness and [...] recognition of one’s common humanity" (Neff et al. 2005)
Theoretical physicist by training (PhD in quantum open systems/quantum information), University lecturer for a bit, and currently paying the bills as an engineer working in optical communication (implementation) and quantum communication (concepts), though still pursuing a little science on the side. I'm interested in physics and math, of course, but I enjoy learning about really any area of science, philosophy, and many other academic areas as well. My biggest other interest is hiking and generally being out in nature.