When you "buy" a book on Kindle, you own only the right to read it as long as you have an Amazon account. When your public library lends you an ebook, it isn't lending something it owns in the first place, but is actually sub-leasing.
Read: "The Anti-Ownership Ebook Economy" for some very, very bad news about your -- and your library's -- rights in the digital age. https://www.nyuengelberg.org/outputs/the-anti-ownership-ebook-economy/
@dangillmor You *can* download kindle ebooks from the Amazon website, then use Calibre/De-DRM/KFX-input plugins to strip the DRM. Been doing this for a decade.
I can’t confirm this, but I see legitimate confirmations from reputable organizations? https://www.dignitymemorial.com/obituaries/las-vegas-nv/kevin-mitnick-11371668
How can research mathematicians and computer scientists help at kids schools, @ColinTheMathmo ? I am interested in outreach to motivate kids to get interested and learn and create mathematics.
The White House is right to continue testing to protect its staff, as COVID levels are rising again, and many people are still at risk.
However, the White House continues to downplay the pandemic in the media, leading the public to take fewer precautions than the White House is taking themselves.
Hey GnuPG people, can you help me figure something out? I'm trying to package torbrowser-launcher for Snapcraft. It uses PyGPGME to verify a PGP sig. I've installed gnupg2, libgpgme11, and python3-gpg from Ubuntu repos.
In an ubuntu:20.04 docker container:
>>> import gpg
>>> gpg.Context()
Context(armor=False, textmode=False, offline=False, signers=[], pinentry_mode=0, protocol=0, home_dir=None)
Inside a my Snapcraft shell:
>>> import gpg
>>> gpg.Context()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/snap/torbrowser-launcher/x5/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 220, in __init__
self.protocol = protocol
File "/snap/torbrowser-launcher/x5/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 169, in __setattr__
super(GpgmeWrapper, self).__setattr__(key, value)
File "/snap/torbrowser-launcher/x5/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/core.py", line 1123, in protocol
errorcheck(gpgme.gpgme_engine_check_version(value))
File "/snap/torbrowser-launcher/x5/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/gpg/errors.py", line 129, in errorcheck
raise GPGMEError(retval, extradata)
gpg.errors.GPGMEError: GPGME: Invalid crypto engine
>>>
Any idea exactly what GPGME needs for PROTOCOL_OpenPGP to be a valid crypto engine?
My how quickly they spin around. (via Tumblr)
"I see Hollywood is now very into the idea of buying something once and then owning it forever and being able to make infinite copies. Which. Isn’t quite the message they imparted upon me in my childhood. In the spirit of their own long-held stance: YOU WOULDN'T DOWNLOAD AN ACTOR"
#Science funding agencies say NO to using #AI for #PeerReview
US’ #NIH Australia’s #ARC : 'NO’ to ChatGPT for peer-review
US' #NSF and Europe's #ERC mulling it over with working groups.
Concerns:
*Privacy/Piracy “the information becomes part of its training data. ” (why I don’t chatGPT though I really hate writing)
*Error ”AI-written reviews will be error-prone"
*Bias ”against non-mainstream views”
*Boring "lack … creativity “
Humans set the bar high
https://www.science.org/content/article/science-funding-agencies-say-no-using-ai-peer-review
So, what's your view on how we should legally think about AI art models that use copyrighted art for training data? I'm not sure there's a compelling analogy?
Clearly this is what human artists do all day long, of course. And the question is in what way is that different form having an AI do it. Any thoughts? I'm particularly interested in people familiar with the most relevant law.
First 24 hours and we're past 200% of our goal! THANK YOU INTERNET!
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/weiner/the-universe-abridged-beyond-the-point-of-usefulness?ref=6vghse
anyone who has ever had anything to do with enterprise codebases will agree - this hits close to home and we all lived through it many times...
"It Takes 6 Days to Change 1 Line of Code
(A true story.)"
🔗 https://edw519.posthaven.com/it-takes-6-days-to-change-1-line-of-code
If anyone is wondering how google is doing, it is giving incorrect answers to the query “How old is the Universe?”
Instead of serving up scientific consensus (just shy of 14 billion years) it is latching onto recent media coverage of a questionable study (tired light, time-dependent coupling constants) claiming a much larger figure.
Notably, it gives me the right answer from an incognito window. But elevating popularity metrics over scientific consensus is a real problem!
Are shareholders really ok with this foolishness?
Is the audience?
#ActorsStrike #WritersStrike #SAGAFTRAstrong #WGAstrong #UnionStrong #film #tv #movies #television #entertainment #media
@ZachWeinersmith Boosted! The temporal extremes also apply to our email replying habits: we'll either reply within Planck's time or by the heat death of the Universe. There's no in between 😅
ANNOUNCING!
(please spread the word!)
Threads to limit number of posts that users can see, like Twitter - The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/17/threads-limits-twitter/
Theoretical physicist by training (PhD in quantum open systems/quantum information), University lecturer for a bit, and currently paying the bills as an engineer working in optical communication (implementation) and quantum communication (concepts), though still pursuing a little science on the side. I'm interested in physics and math, of course, but I enjoy learning about really any area of science, philosophy, and many other academic areas as well. My biggest other interest is hiking and generally being out in nature.