mandlebro @mandlebro@social.cleverlibre.org

activation sequence

Please name other amendments to the United States Constitution, and how they cannot be applied to modern technology.

The first amendment did not take the internet and mass/social media into account, yet we have the protection of speech, assembly, religion and to petition the government.

The writers of the 4th amendment did not envision email, chat logs, and hard drives, yet they fall under the purview of "personal papers and effects" and are ostensibly protected from warrantless search and seizure.

These laws are not "BS" as they very deliberately put hard caps on what the government is allowed to do, they do not grant rights and privileges like European laws do. The 2nd amendment is the freedom of the people to bear arms in order to provide for the security of a free state. The technology is deliberately not defined but fall under the blanket umbrella of "arms" which have advanced in effectiveness since time immemorial.

The fact that Americans are armed to the teeth give government at least some pause to whether or not they can get away with things. Doesn't always work, but the potential is there. Its better than holding your limp dick in the face of automatic weapons. Please read pic related:

@Sterence sterence, if your still there, if youre still listening, this one's for you...

@Mitsu

@Frosche @Koropokkur @doctorsex @ChristiJunior @WolfJay @kaosktrl

Demo video of bulletproof glass in 1932

"The Cosmic Dali". From a series of photographs by Philippe Halsman, designed by Dali, 1948
http://www.all-art.org/art_20th_century/dali-5.html