Show newer

RT @ddemortain
10 jours pr postuler comme ingénieur de recherche @CNRS pour la plateforme @CorTexT_team
@umr_lisis. N'hésitez pas à m'écrire ou à @ScTechViz
pour vous informer et nous rejoindre! 👉tinyurl.com/9tumvup

Now we have a national estimation of the total cost for article processing charges, 30M€ / year (France). The cost has tripled in ten years. The cost will probably double again in the next decade...
---
RT @ouvrirlascience
How much do APCs cost French research institutions?
The French Ministry of Higher Education and Research publishes a study that quantifies the costs of article processing charges and predicts their evolution by 2…
twitter.com/ouvrirlascience/st

On en parle depuis longtemps, mais rarement sur la base d'estimations fiables. Désormais, nous savons combien coûtent les frais de publication pour la France (30M€ par an!) et nous avons une estimation crédible des tendances pour les dix prochaines années.
---
RT @ouvrirlascience
Combien coûtent les APC ?
Le ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche publie une étude qui chiffre les coûts générés par les frais de publ…
twitter.com/ouvrirlascience/st

Mieux comprendre et accompagner l'usage des identifiants numériques des contributeurs de la recherche notamment ORCID en France.

Enquête à laquelle vous êtes invités à répondre

orcid-france.fr/mieux-comprend

FAIRifying a scholarly publishing service: Methodology based on the OpenEdition’s internal FAIR audit

The FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) constitute a guide whose aim is to improve the management of digital scholarly resources. Nevertheless, the literature regarding data services other than data repositories is still scarce.OpenEdition is a digital infrastructure for open scholarly communication in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) that carried out an internal full review to assess the degree of FAIRness of its activities. The objective of this paper is to present the methodology employed by OpenEdition’s team and the recommendations for the FAIRification of a publishing system, and hence, the elements for the FAIR Publishing Toolkit. The FAIR review was conducted in three main phases: preparation, assessment, and result phase, which listed the recommendations for the FAIR principles implementation. The preparation phase gathered the available information to define the perimeter of the FAIR review. It comprised two steps: the landscape study and the exam of actual use cases. The assessment phase contextualized the FAIR principles according to the scholarly publishing context, defined the datasets to be analyzed, carried outa FAIR maturity review per dataset, and analyzed the state of the art of some important FAIR-related elements. The result phase produced the recommendations, organized as priorities and extended objectives. The priority recommendations regard persistent identifiers and licensing policies. The extended objectives focus on authors' information management, controlled vocabularies, machine-actionability, and Digital Management Plans.

journals.publishing.umich.edu/

RT @ponceto91
La version 2.0.1 de upscayl est disponible. Pour rappel, c'est un outil utilisant de l'IA permettant d'agrandir des images sans perte perceptible de détails. Il supporte Windows, MacOS et Linux

github.com/upscayl/upscayl/rel

RT @NicMatyjasik
Mais quelle vidéo projetée sur l'ambassade d’Iran à Londres. 💪🙏

RT @ABRGLL
Moi quand @fredserval me dit qu'on va jouer à Fire in The Lakr

RT @opencitations
We are ! Call for applications now open (deadline: 28 February 2023) for a 12-month Research Fellow position to work on managing and developing the technical infrastructure of - more info at: bandi.unibo.it/ricerca/assegni

RT @Pyb75
L'association @Wikimedia_Fr boucle son budget 2022-2023 grâce à la collecte de dons qui se termine le 31 décembre. D'ores et déjà merci aux 5000 personnes qui nous soutiennent 🫶
💙 Pour faire un don wikimedia.fr/don/
💚 Foire aux questions wikimedia.fr/soutenir-wikimedi

RT @opencitations

Why OpenCitations Meta? represents a major infrastructural advance for OpenCitations, since it addresses and overcomes some of the limitations previously experienced, providing three major benefits:

Mozilla to Explore Healthy Social Media Alternative
In early 2023, Mozilla will stand up and test a publicly accessible instance in the Fediverse at Mozilla.Social.
blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mo

Fascinating
---
RT @culturaltutor
Ancient people knew the earth was round.

And about 2,240 years ago a man called Eratosthenes calculated its circumference within 1% of the correct figure... with a stick.
twitter.com/culturaltutor/stat

RT @NaudetFlorian
According to @Nature « More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments » … well…
… I am among those… and merry Xmas. nature.com/articles/533452a

RT @Centre_Mersenne
Grâce au travail de l'équipe éditoriale et du centre Mersenne, les Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences reçoivent le DOAJ Seal 🙂

➡️comptes-rendus.academie-scienc


@CNRS
@UGrenobleAlpes
@AcadSciences
@INIST_LaLIST

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.