Show newer

I love this!

7 (nonfiction) books to get to know me - or really, the 7 that have shaped my thinking:

- The Courage to Teach by Parker Palmer
- Writing Down the Bones by Natalie Goldberg
- Caste by Isabelle Wilkerson
- Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich
- Difficult Conversations by Stone, Patton & Heen
- Working by Studs Terkel
- The End of White Christian America by Robert P. Jones

#7Books #Bookstadon #Books

Want an introduction to , not to be confused with ?

You need to watch this 2017 webinar via Corwin.

In anticipation of reading Zaretta hammond's book, Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain, I decided to watch her webinar (twice, it was that good!).

mguhlin.org/2021/09/reflection

@QasimRashid

We are a non-profit food bank based in New York City, and we’re sending you one of our favorite dad jokes in the hopes of getting a boost.

A customer walks into a shoe store and approaches the sales clerk. “I need a pair of those orthodox shoes, please.”
The clerk responds, “I think you mean orthopedic shoes.”
“Oh,” said the customer. “I stand corrected.”

Please follow us if you’d like to help promote #FoodJustice in #NewYorkCity. We may even tell the occasional #DadJoke.

Follow-up question: How do we empower #educators to teach #cyber courses outside of their (possible) comfort zone? #cybersecurityeducation #education #educationpolicy

Illustrating Stories with Canva's NEW AI Text to Image Tool

✍️ Students write!
🎨 Canva illustrates!

📖 Example story, ▶️ tutorial video, and ✅ detailed directions at:
controlaltachieve.com/2022/11/

#edtech #ControlAltAchieve #elachat #writing #ai #canva #edutooter @edutooters

@scerruti @mguhlin Social networks are not meant for K-12. Even under close supervision. They are fabulous for higher ed and PD.

@scerruti @mguhlin We just have to teach them internet safety and digital citizenship. More importantly, we have to teach parents how to digitally engage with their children. Parents don’t get the kind of PD that educators get. They don’t get any at all, and we need to change that.

I've seen plenty of discussions in recent days over the network structure of Mastodon and whether it can remain decentralized as large commercial players begin taking an interest in the fediverse. I am neither an engineer nor an economist, but I do research the way media and information get distributed and I have some thoughts on this. A thread…

@mguhlin as a computer science teacher I have benefited from online professional communities but wished that they were not on platforms I rail against as being detrimental to our students and society.

I am willing to donate my money and, more importantly, my time to create a new space free of that stain. I hope that others well join me and share in the administrative and financial burden.

My investment is driven from the same place my teaching originates, hope for a better future for all.

Discovering all kinds of interesting new spaces out here (not good for Getting.Work.Done, but very nice for my reading list!)

So #introduction: #twittermigration, science and technology studies scholar (robots!), union activist (for it makes us strong!), former ficwriter, #SF and #SFFBookClub geek.

If you know my handle from elsewhere, you probably know me (not my first migration rodeo). Let me know you're arrived, looking to rebuild what I can & meet new folks here!

PS: Edit function RULES.

If folks want to prevent these outcomes, for example to preserve a system where everyone logs on through small communities where they know the admin and moderators personally, the governing principles need to be put in place now. The technology won't do it by itself, and in fact it may create conditions that favor the opposite outcome. /fin

The future may well be a bunch of Mastodon instances managed by a small number of hosting providers. Or a commercial instance with so much of the user base that the majority of instances treat its federation requirements as de facto policy. The downsides of concentrated, commercial social media are well known. @ubiquity75's work provides a master class here. <behindthescreen-book.com/> 17/

Twitter and Musk's fanboys 

I have hope for Mastodon as a platform. I want to help make it succeed. But it has to succeed for EVERYBODY - the marginalized, the endangered, the vulnerable. People must absolutely be safe.

That's hard to do. But it must be done.

(End thread, thanks for reading)

Show thread

Twitter and Musk's fanboys 

It's vital that as Mastodon and the Fediverse figure out a moderation strategy that engineers be ready to implement the tools that those moderators (individually or as a collective) ask for. The people who have done this for a long time know what they need. There's no engineering solution to toxic content, but there is engineering work nonetheless.

Show thread

Somos un Homo Signis: signo y referente, sujetos significantes; animales simbólicos, mentes codificantes; especies sintácticas; códigos psicosocioracionales; mamíferos semánticos. Somos el ser que comunica.

Having moved instances, I want to post my #introduction to Humanities Commons social. My research and teaching interests include Early Modern English drama, particularly #Shakespeare, and the intersections between literature, culture, gender, law, and politics. I teach Shakespeare, late 16th and early 17th century English drama, early modern English women writers, and feminist theory. I am working on a book project on women parrhesiasts in early modern English drama. I am also here for #catsofmastodon #cats #earlymodern #academia #litstudies #histodons

How to Add Descriptions to Your Google Drive Folders youtu.be/YASeE74T-EY from Richard Byrne #edutooter #edtech #googleedu

I've been thinking a lot about the discourse around moderation, Black folks' experiences, and the culture here. This is a longer post to dig a bit into how we can discuss and change the culture here to be more inclusive and equitable and just.

First step is to stop doing band-aid solutions. Folks who keep saying "we're a community of builders" in response to social critiques or saying "just make your own server or move" need to take a step back and consider that is coming off as ignorance at best and racist at worst. It's a band-aid solution that doesn't truly solve the inherent problem that impacts the network as a whole.

People shouldn't *have* to move servers. The server ought to change and be more inclusive, which means tackling the culture of that server and how it moderates. And if they do decide to move servers, they shouldn't have to deal with it again there either. It's the overall culture that contributes to the harmful bigotry people may face in a server.

Culture exists everywhere, including in a "community of builders." If you don't deal with the culture that causes harm to some people, then you can't claim your culture is "inclusive" or that there is an "engineering" solution to a cultural problem.

Dr. Flowers (shengokai@zirk.us) made some excellent threads that analyze the situation on Mastodon -- specifically social side of it. zirk.us/@shengokai/10938037254 Is one of the critiques. Go read them all! He spoke with folks who been here a long time and dug deep for his analyses.

Now, is there a solution to the issues of culture here that have consciously or not caused harm to marginalized folks?

Yes, there can be by coming together and having these discussions.

However, only engineering solutions isn't gonna cut it. Although Mastodon does need some engineering solutions (the moderation can be improved upon greatly with some better engineering. The protocol is wonky that could be improved too), but that will not fix the culture.

What fixes the culture?

Discussions like these. People willing to listen, to be uncomfortable, to confront harmful attitudes, and unlearn and build up new ways of being.

That's part of what being in community IS. We need to unlearn all the time. We need to listen, be uncomfortable, be flexible, be willing to change.

Change is necessary. It is not either good or bad - it's a neutral force that can be weaponized in a bad way (see Elongated Musky's twitter takeover) or in a good way (people building more just, equitable, sustainable, and accessible platforms).

But change is needed. Change needs to be done on a tech level, a culture level, and on a personal level.

So think about behaviors witnessed here -- behaviors you do too -- think about what norms Mastodon users, especially those who helped build it or been here a long time, enforce.

Some of the norms are good. Such as people defaulting to using alt-text for their photos and video screenshots (thank you!).

Others are a good idea that can be weaponized in painful ways

For example the CW: first situation I'll use to discuss this is: its utility to avoid triggering panic or pain for those with trauma is good. This is being mindful of those around us and seeking to create a culture of care.

Second situation: people trying to force Black folks and other marginalized identities to cover their posts because it made the person uncomfortable is harmful. This puts the marginalized person in a position of having to CW all their posts as the oppression faced often colors their interactions in most spaces, so trying to write about their experiences without mentioning it would be difficult. (It's difficult for me as a disabled nonbinary person, and I don't have to deal with the intersection of race too.)

In the first CW situation, the poster makes a conscious choice to be mindful of others - the poster makes the decision and holds agency over it. Their decision is theirs alone.

In the second CW situation, readers with more privilege (thus more power) try to coerce the poster with less privilege (thus less power) into a specific action to lessen the reader's cognitive dissonance and uncomfortable emotions. This is a power imbalance, and if numerous people with more power and privilege barrage the poster, the power imbalance tips into harassment.

If we examine who gets targeted the most for the "put a CW on this" when sharing experiences, we can also see an imbalance where marginalized populations get hit harder - this is a consequence of the power imbalance within the culture itself.

To be clear, for someone with less privilege, they hold less power in these situations. So asking a poster to put in alt-text on an image would not fit the second situation I described above. The less privileged individual is seeking access to what everyone else already has. That is not and should not be equated with someone who seeks to silence or cover-up the story of another regardless of intent.

That power balance inherent within privilege is also a cultural aspect that needs discussed. I used CW as a way to model thinking about how norms within a culture create power imbalances. Mastodon is not immune to the wider cultures of people's home countries, and there are many countries across the world that privilege specific groups over others that can be replicated into Mastodon's culture consciously or unconsciously. That needs examined too.

Norms of how discussions and change ought to go also need examined and possibly changed. Think about interactions here, think about whose voices get heard the most, think about who moderates, who owns servers, who writes the code, etc. All of these factors have a role in building and shaping culture.

And yes, even code can be biased as it is written by human beings, and we're biased beings. (There is an excellent book by a Black author that discusses this actually called
Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code by Ruha Benjamin).

These are important questions if we are to build a community that is equitable, just, consensual, accessible, sustainable.

Yes, this seems like a lot! But that's why we do it through conversations. With actions that build up over time. Nothing can or should be done all at once. Community building takes *time* and commitment.

Make sure to listen to those most marginalized. When we care and uplift our most vulnerable, giving them access and support, then we help all of us.

Thanks for reading!

Since Mastodon saw its initial popularity circa 2017, I've noticed that most users and those reporting on it either don't think about the Fediverse as anything more than Mastodon, or treat its history as beginning with Eugen Rochko and the beginning of Mastodon. In fact, Mastodon is the latest in a long line of federated social networks, going at least back to Identi.ca, and though I wasn't around for all of it,I find this history pretty interesting. (Thread; boosts welcome!)

Show older

Miguel Guhlin 🦉 🇵🇦 🇺🇲's choices:

CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.