Show newer

@mph Just saw your blog posted by Sacha and I was wondering if you have an RSS feed for it? I found it very informative.

@natharari I use project-tab-groups mode. So I have:
1) a tab per git project open + 1 garbage tab for scratches and other stuff.
2) tabs get named based on project dir
3) M-page up and M-page down
4) already answered

@sqrtminusone Ah yes. Good point. I'm on a Mac and I use Warp terminal with AI built in so, I'll have to pass. 😀

"Some of you students of history may remember way back in 2021, when the right insisted that it was waging war against what it called 'cancel culture.'"

Today's Morning Shots from @SykesCharlie: morningshots.thebulwark.com/p/

Ukraine can win, even in Crimea. And if they do, the reverberations will be felt around the world. Jeffrey Goldberg and I reported from Mikolaiv, Kherson, Odessa, Kyiv:

theatlantic.com/magazine/archi

@natharari I mean, if I'm working on a client-server project, I have a perspective called "term" for Alacritty (which goes there automatically), and either one perspective for the entire project or one for the backend and one for the frontend.

Essentially, the key difference is that a perspective is a group of buffers, while a tab is a view for the same global set of buffers. Since I wanted the former, I went with perspective.el.

...or at least this was the case when I made that choice, because tab-bar.el seems to have been inspired by Vim tabs. Since then, some 3rd party packages appeared that essentially replicate the behavior of perspective.el with tab-bar.

But perspective.el does all of that out-of-the-box, I have grown quite familiar with the inner workings of the package, and it got into a lot of things in my setup (such as this auto-assignment logic), so I'm not particularly eager to switch.

Another important thing to me was the integration between Treemacs and perspective, which allows to have one perspective = one instance of Treemacs = one or multiple git projects. However, I no longer use Treemacs.

@sqrtminusone I see. It makes sense. It's like tab grouping in Safari it seems.

I also didn't know that you can run Alacritty in Emacs?

Always worth remembering. The web could have been proprietary infrastructure.
npr.org/2023/04/30/1172276538/

"30 years ago this week… something called the World Wide Web launched into the #PublicDomain…#CERN owned Berners-Lee's invention and the lab had the option to license [it] out…for profit. But Berners-Lee believed that keeping the web as open as possible would help it grow… [He] eventually convinced CERN to release the World Wide Web into the public domain without any patents or fees."

@sqrtminusone

1) So, basically, just one single buffer with no tabs, right?
2) So perspectives replaces tabs for you. I used to do that too. It's a cool system. 👍
3) Nice.
4) I like that idea.
5) Yeah. I have one dedicated tab for it. It's useful that way.

I like your system a lot. It seems to reflect mine but with perspectives instead of tabs. Are there certain advantages for you in using perspectives instead of tabs? I'm curious.

I'm running my final through #ChatGPT and reading the replies I'm just...like, these answers aren't great but they're good. I would be entirely satisfied in my teaching and the student's learning if one could produce this

Maybe my standards are too low

#academia

@newsopinionsandviews@masto.ai They should refuse to let him in.

@natharari
To switch tabs, I use C-Tab or C-Switch-Tab, same key shortcuts as in Firefox.

Point 5 is in my TODO list 😜

I'm not the only one putting Googly Eyes on my wood chipper and calling it Cookie Monster, right?

NPR: Freya became a global celebrity last year after she was seen frolicking and basking in a Oslo fjord before she was euthanized by the authorities. A bronze sculpture now honors her in Norway's capital.#news #NPR npr.org/2023/05/01/1173012403/

The richest 1 percent grabbed nearly two-thirds of all new #wealth worth $42 trillion created since 2020, almost twice as much money as the bottom 99 percent of the world’s population, reveals a new #Oxfam report today. During the past decade, the richest 1 percent had captured around half of all new wealth.

1% of people captured 2/3 of all wealth.

oxfam.org/en/press-releases/ri

@jcastp

1) Cool.
2) OK
3) I guess you don't switch tabs often?
4) Cool
5) I am chagrined and saddened! 😲

@wirthy

1) Cool
2) OK
3) I really like that.
4) Interesting
5) Shocking! 😃

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.