Show newer

eff.org/deeplinks/2023/07/deja Section 702 (which the FBI relies on for unconstitutional mass surveillance) is on the brink of expiring again.

These "this service should be penalized for taking down content which isn't against their terms of service" bill proposals are very strange.

A platform could easily just create a vaguer terms of service which covers even more content...?

When writing apocalypse novels or scripts for apocalyptic films, remember to include a scene of people fighting over toilet paper, lol.

reason.com/2023/07/27/a-profes Professor at Texas A&M University suspended for criticizing government official over not implementing harm reduction measures (for opioids).

Isn't this a violation of the First Amendment?

reason.com/2023/07/27/brickbat
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/calif
Elderly veteran receives $20 million settlement over lawsuit over being slammed into the ground by cops (over suspected drunk driving) and being left paralyzed.

Mocked by cops.

Web Environment Integrity is a horrible idea and Google should be ashamed.

Olives boosted

WATCH: Senate Commerce is about to vote on KOSA.

You can watch the livestream and take action at the same time here badinternetbills.com/#livestre

Keep fighting!

Fight for the Future  
Inside intel + expectations on the #KOSA committee vote today: they’re probably going to pass it out of committee. But! They’re shaking in their bo...
Olives boosted

Inside intel + expectations on the #KOSA committee vote today: they’re probably going to pass it out of committee. But! They’re shaking in their boots thanks to the thousands of people who are calling them out. What we’re doing is WORKING, and the fight is far from over.

Olives boosted

My statement on today's markup of the Kids Online Safety Act: The legislative process is broken.

This describes it well.

Willow  
Truth #censorship #encryption #cypherpunk #privacy #kosa #EarnItAct
Olives boosted

Yeah, Ylva's opinion survey is unethical. If you want honest opinions, trying to twist someone's arm / influence them to answer a particular way seems antithetical to that.

Also, some of the claims she made to these people were also misleading / false.

Running that same survey again with a slight modification (to add a few items reliant on existing items) doesn't fix the underlying flaws in it...

Of course, he is trying to invoke a weak flavor of "won't anyone please think of the children?" to try to push his unconstitutional ideas.

Show thread
Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.