rastinza @rastinza@social.cleverlibre.org

@gelato_al_pollo Oh no, è cazzopollo!

@kenobit Credo che questo non sia un buon esempio. Stiamo parlando di un social network popolato principalmente da esperti di informatica e persone attente alla privacy, almeno fino ad ora.
Chiedere qualcosa sul tema probabilmente porterà a risposte in tempi rapidi; così come chiedere qualche domanda tecnica sulle classi in C++.

Non so se questo regga quando invece si chiede di altre cose.
Tempo fa ho scritto opinioni sullo sviluppo di farmaci e sulla priorità delle malattie da curare; nessuno ha risposto.
Prova a chiedere cose specifiche in qualche ambito meno popolare su Mastodon, dubito che riceverai così tante risposte e così velocemente.

@AbNormal @kallisti Don't worry, all chemists were scared by all that at some point. Most of us just stayed in for the cool colours and explosions. Which is funny since it's a few years I don't do any of those things anymore...

@neurob Perché? Hai deciso di affiliarti per sempre alla PA?

#finanza #evasione
Visto che la guardia di finanza ha implementato tutta una serie di metodologie all'avanguardia per scovare gli evasori, come il socialometro, volevo comparare il numero di evasori trovati con queste innovazioni con quello precedente.

Io ho cercato un po', sul sito della guardia di finanza, sui giornali, su vari siti istituzionali e via così.
Di dati sull'operato della GdF non si trova davvero nulla eccetto i saltuari "trovato ingegnere che ha evaso tot allo stato".
Voi sapete dove posso rimediare questa informazione? Chessò, un numero di evasori identificati ogni anno o quantità di denaro trovato.

Mi sembra assurdo che non sia possibile monitorare l'efficienza dei nostri servizi pubblici. D'altronde li paghiamo, mi pare il minimo avere informazioni sull'efficienza di qualcosa che si paga.

Following the #science #hashtag was a mistake; thank you all folks, you're very cool but after a week of introductions flowing in my home timeline I'm a bit annoyed.
I guess I'll go back to the flow of boosts by my good old and reliable @GustavinoBevilacqua

@statsepi I mean, there's been a long running rant on here of a very low amount of young people on this platform.
Most people I know here is over 40 and I only know a few people being less than 30 despite me being one of them.

@GAM Si lascia Roma?

@coogie I believe your attitude may not be the best to understand how things work and why they do work so; not necessarily I'm saying they work well.
I disagree with what you say, and in particular with your "nip that in the bud"; this is not a fresh social network in which rules and uses still have to be decided, there is a large user base who already communicates in a certain way.
I feel the best question for you should be: why in this social network I just joined boosts are not endorsement? After understanding that you may choose to disagree and try to change things.

I, for example, don't think people should just boost stuff they agree with and I very often boost stuff I really don't like.
As an example: political party leader said something unacceptable, I will boost that to let people know about the incompetence of the guy.
Moreover, I might boost someone making a point I disagree with to get more people into the conversation.

This is not Twitter, don't try to change it as if it was Twitter; there is plenty of things that don't work well; but the ability to read and talk about things you disagree with is not one of them.

After this Twitter migration my #GustavinoRatio dropped to 27% and the website can barely measure it for one single day due to the great amount of toots...
I'm sorry @GustavinoBevilacqua I can barely encounter a toot or two of yours among this huge flow.

Things are going to change rapidly here in the next weeks.
We'll see what happens.
It would be nice to monitor some parameters to be able to give some metric to these changes.
I guess something interesting would be the daily number of hashtags, which I believe is going to increase drastically.

@Britt @meganlynch People are fooling themselves that specific communication mechanisms make people better.
This is not what happens.
There is good moderation and consciousness by the users, or at least that was the case before a huge amount of users from Twitter came here.
This huge flow of people will at least temporarily disrupt the moderation mechanisms.
Probably it will change the culture and rules of Mastodon, I hope for the better.
Mastodon, has until now been a bit of a closed and obscure place; not a showroom to talk about yourself but rather a dark alley where to go with a couple of friends and do cool stuff you wouldn't advertise to most people.
Things are going to change with this large influx of users, what will happen is difficult to forecast.

@aspuru Yes, unfortunately Mastodon is very bad for finding stuff published in the past; it's only really good at getting recent updates...
I'm happy you found some interesting persons to follow there though!

@aspuru wow, I'm happy to see such wonderful people flocking to mastodon!
I believe that if you go back enough in my profile you might find a toot in which I talked about SELFIES and gave a brief explanation of how that works and why it's important

I'm amazed by the good work of you and your team, I hope we'll be able to meet one day.

@EveryWhereChem I propose #chemistry it works, it clearly explains what we're talking about; it has no strange frills and you don't need to remember some strange combination of different words smashed together.
Keep it simple, the word works fine and shouldn't result in any problem.