Show newer

Look at the construction (and the proof in appendix) of public key encryption scheme out of witness encryption in eprint.iacr.org/2013/258.pdf

It uses witness encryption, where the only confidentiality guarantee is that "if you encrypt the plaintext in a way that does not admit decryption at all, there will be no way to recover the plaintext from ciphertext", to construct something that actually has standardish confidentiality guarantees by exploiting that this property must extend to cases that are computationally indistinguishable from ones where the assumption really holds.

robryk boosted

Things you can do with zero-knowledge: prove that you performed some algorithmic process correctly.

Things you can’t do: prove that you kept a secret.

This is an important point that really limits what we can do with the technology.

robryk boosted

Our electronics educational segment for today: U.S. Army Restricted Training Film: "Vacuum Tubes (The Triode)": 1943. - youtube.com/watch?v=acGXBJv6AT

Rereading a novel I got amused by:

> Wanaka’s rather grim smile could just be made out behind her mask. “Until we get a better idea,” she
gestured. “All hands, start thinking.”

robryk boosted

Hm~ thought experiment: how would the world look like if trademarks could only be owned by corporations[1] with a responsibility only towards upholding the trademark's reputation[2]?

[1] question of ownership unresolved (theoretically it should be immaterial)

[2] question of who has standing to argue that they're not fulfilling this duty also open

cc @TechConnectify @aredridel

robryk boosted

the sad reality of open source software development

In short: folks love the amazing decentralised encrypted comms utopia of Matrix. But organisations also love that they can use it without having to pay anyone to develop or maintain it. This is completely unsustainable, and Element is now literally unable to fund the entirety of the Matrix Foundation on behalf of everyone else - and has had to lay off some of the folks working on the core team as a result.

matrix.org/blog/2022/12/25/the

We define the rank of a matrix as the minimal number of rank-1 (i.e. of the form w^\dagger{}v) matrices that sum to it. I wonder what happens when we decide to optimize for something else: say, norm of type $foo over norms of type $bar over those matrices. Obvious candidates for $foo are L_{something}, for $bar are operator norms or Frobenius norm.

In particular, $foo=L_n and $bar=operator norm inherited from L_n seems potentially interesting (in particular for n=2).

Ok, it seems to have the the old-and-well-known preponderance to just pull numbers and multiply them without regard for what they are: you.com/search?q=How+heavy+is+

Show thread
robryk boosted

Question: Why has there been nearly 0 media coverage in the US about Enovid and other nasal sprays?

"Most significantly, it showed, specifically for a higher risk population, that a negative PCR was achieved on Day 4 (median) compared to Day 8 for placebo."

That's really good?!

medthority.com/news/2022/7/pee

The chatbot-style answers of you.com seem impressive.

If asked nonsensical questions, they provide nonsensical answers. However, contrary to chatgpt, when asked very weird but sensible questions or fact lookup questions, it does provide correct answers (also, doesn't refuse to answer questions on fake grounds).

Why do PKP IC (pkp.pl/) and Blik (blik.com/en) put people under time pressure when performing transactions? They teach people to click stuff without reading (and probably also lose some part of ability to claim that customers really know the terms of service, given that they make them impossible to read in the timeframe).

robryk boosted

I figured out why the #fediverse clicks with so many GenXers. It's "yesterday's tomorrow!"

That is, it's the decentralized networked future we imagined as kids, complete with the billionaire baddies, evil corps, and environmental degradation plot lines all playing at the edge of the screen.

robryk boosted

Speaking of Zener breakdown, here's a classic #electronics brainteaser. Find a generic small-signal bipolar transistor, e.g. 2N3904, 2N2222. Connect Emitter to +12 V via 1 kΩ, and ground Base. You can then find a negative voltage around -0.4 V relative to ground at Collector. Why can it be negative, when there's no negative voltage anywhere in this circuit?

When the base-emitter junction experiences Zener breakdown, it emits red light, which shines upon the base-collector junction. Photovoltaic effect creates this negative voltage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKlbO5mOZm4

When you don't realize that you've bought disks with quite high vibrations at seek time:

(The doohickeys are from thingiverse.com/thing:1774380. All in all works surprisingly well; apparently ~all the audible seek noise was coming via the case due to impedance matching.)

@lauren Why do most (all?) your posts include an all-white image?

robryk boosted

Playing with GCP's Confidential Compute stuff, and I feel like the advice in the docs to verify that the VM has confidential compute enabled by (checks notes) asking the metadata service whether the instance has confidential compute enabled is maybe missing the point a little

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.