skells @skells@social.cleverlibre.org

>be JRR Tolkien
>refuse to bend the knee
>be super obnoxious in protest
>embarrace family
>doesn't matter, did the right thing

"The Sleeping Lady", Alaska...
C9728C5F-752E-4449-B3BF-28A46EC75A58.jpeg

open source hardware
open source manufacturing
open source government

The establishment is really effective at divide and conquer.

They will ban Catholic content, Catholics complain. They ban Palestinian opinions, Palestinians complain. They ban feminists, and feminists complain.

People need to unite and recognize that we can debate and disagree about all sorts of things, but the real danger to freedom is authoritarian elites who think they have some sort of legitimate right to control debate and censor, ban, harass, spy on, etc. people who contest that.

@pasture I have a dream that one day on the purple vapor wave wireframes of cyberspace, the sons of former channers and the sons of former alt-right retards will be able to sit down together at the table of federation.

I have a dream that one day even the current state of the internet, a web of networks sweltering with the heat of censorship, sweltering with the heat of centralization, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and decentralization.

I have a dream that my little mixed race children 51% hybrid swarms will one day live as NEETs on an internet where they will not be judged by their virtue signals but by the content of their shitposts.

I have a dream today!

U'LL WORK HARDER WITH A GUN IN YOUR BACK FOR A BOWL OF RICE A DAY - CNBC

imagem.png

A little laughter to start the day. In the Morning!

ngh? @mguw @IAMAL_PHARIUS @11112011 @GhostOfMoshe @Heliodramus @Jdogg247 @PonyPanda @Prodigal @Terry @ThreeOneThreeChris @Zerglingman @alcade @leyonhjelm @p @sjw @thedonnerd @xxshtxx
1ac54fcbd3dec7d6b594ebc2076c957f.png

we can be heros @11112011 @GhostOfMoshe @GoodPerson @Heliodramus @IAMAL_PHARIUS @Jdogg247 @PonyPanda @Prodigal @Terry @ThreeOneThreeChris @Zerglingman @alcade @amnesiac @andreas @izzilis @lewdthewides @leyonhjelm @mguw @mushroom_soup @oxblood @p @sean @sjw @sneeden @stevejail @thedonnerd @xxshtxx
ba2b840368db921e997abe7b576dbac669bec524fb603df302478d96a35fdc63.jpeg

"It feels like the last 20 years we've spent rebuilding all the stuff Unix users had builtin 20 to 40 years ago: online editors, shared home directories, etc. All sorts of things are repeating again.

One of the things Unix had was composability. If there's a table on a website now and one on another website, and you wanna join them? Fuck you."

-- Joshua Schachter

The scientific evidence was overwhelming, he said. The data from twenty-seven studies, sixteen of them randomized controlled trials, demonstrated, with highly statistically significant, overwhelmingly positive, consistent, and reproducible rates, that people who got sick with COVID-19 were far more likely to quickly get better at home when they took Ivermectin. They didn’t go to the hospital. Housemates of people with COVID-19 who took Ivermectin didn’t get infected. People who got moderately ill in hospitals didn’t go to the ICU; they got better quicker and went home faster. Hospitals didn’t get overrun. The drug even saved elderly, critically ill COVID-19 patients from dying compared to those routinely dying elsewhere. Six prevention studies showed Ivermectin reduced the risk of getting COVID-19 by 92.5 percent, superior to many vaccines. Dr. Hector Carvallo, a professor of medicine at the University of Buenos Aires, gave 788 doctors and other health care workers in three medical centers weekly Ivermectin prophylaxis, with a control group of 407 doctors and others who didn’t get the drug. In the control group 236 people, or 58 percent, “had become ill with COVID.” Among the 788 who got Ivermectin, “no infections were recorded.”