但是摘眼镜很麻烦,所以每次都想偷懒挑战自己(
BTW, FT8 makes me feel comfortable since other modes like voice or psk31 are too real-time. I can't react that fast but I don't want the other side to be waiting for me.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
可能是因为他们suspend了qoto,我在客户端上完全没办法获取到信息。
我注意到有一些客户端,例如我正在使用的fedilab(安卓)支持多账号。所以理论上可以同时接收多个账户的通知。另外我看ifttt似乎可以通过某种方法来同步发帖,就是你在一个主账号上发帖,然后通过ifttt同步发到其他账号上。
建议联邦制比较混乱,我觉得这个可能是最高兼容性的解决方案了。我个人的话还是比较鄙夷那些小心眼服务器的(逃
Don't worry, my English is not the best, but I think it's ok to make a "valid communication".
Actually, I start playing Minecraft since 1.5.2, but few of my friends love Minecraft. So I don't play much (Maybe several days per month?), but I still like this game. The mod community is so fascinating and there are a lot of YouTubers making great Minecraft videos.
Most of the time I'll do some coding, because, I love coding. Now I'm preparing for my college graduation, writing a lot of code per day, and feels not bad.
And at that time (2021 30th Jan), I was broken up with my friend and not in good mood. But I'm doing pretty good now, and we reviewed our behavior/relation and now we're friends again.
Just have a glance on https://mastodon.technology/about/more
It listed qoto.org in the suspended list because of "choosing to federate with fascist instances."
LOL
Technically speaking, each new instance could be fascist instances, unless you see and verify it, so I guess in this case, what you need/want is a whitelist, not a blacklist.
So in defense of qoto, I'd say no one can represent me, and my opinion (including Chinese governments and other companies, that's why I deleted Weibo in 2014 and now moved from Twitter to mastodon, after Musk purchased twitter). If there is a fascist instance, I have to see it in my eye and block it with my own hand. It's much different from admins "helping" me block it, especially without notifying me.
@Candinya 多半是NTFS的锅(
NTFS:等我写个日志先
Checkout this visual tutorial on how to use @opensuse 's new Leap Micro 5.2. Cool Demo! https://youtu.be/ft8UVx9elKc
"It’s finally here"
submitted by Empero6
https://reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/u9tlgz/its_finally_here/
If you changed it, then by committing your changes, you created a new commit node and attached it to the original head, but you won't find your new commit node since the original node is detached and there is no branch to trace the head changes.
A branch has historical states too, and just like heikkiket says, a branch and tag is just a pointer/reference to a certain commit. I didn't know too much about how git store things, but I do know how ipfs works. They have similar structures on storage.
Basically, each time you commit something, it will create a commit node to store the current snapshot, this is read-only and is organized by hash, if the content changes, then you get a different hash, aka a new commit. A branch is a chain of commit where later one has a father where you can find the last state. Thus a branch can only record what the latest commit is, and let the chain structure do the rest.
If you have multiple branch and they are merged a few times, then you will get a graph, specifically speaking, a DAG. But the idea is same, each commit is a snapshot of a history state, that's how you can track and access every possible history version of a repo.
I guess it just allow you to access a historical status/state. Just like you can review every possible "snapshot" of the repo, that's the thing support the version control behind the scenes.
Abandoned since this instance is broken. Please follow my new account: @skyblond