Show newer
tripu boosted

@tripu Good article. It's been a long time since I agreed with a conservative. It's interesting that he and I both agree that media is a big part of the problem. Perhaps our shared hypothesis is correct, and the Right and the Left would find even more common ground without the for-profit news media getting in the way.

> _“Truly, mainstream is the great Mugger of Reality. Even when its individual stories are rock solid, it promotes a deeply false Big Picture of the world. And unless you have the intellectual steel to_ constantly _remind yourself, ‘This is a horribly misleading perspective,’ consuming media tends to make you believe this deeply false Big Picture.”_

— [Bryan Caplan](betonit.substack.com/p/mainstr)

If you are an speaker but not a speaker, do me a favour:

Imagine that the word you use in your native language for hair that is yellow-ish and for people with that type of hair (“blonde”) were, by sheer chance, identical to the word that the inhabitants of Otherland use to refer, approvingly, to people who like to sodomise babies.

Now, when you are using your language in public settings (on the street, on the internet) with fellow countrypeople , there are often Otherlanders nearby, overhearing what you say or reading your content.

Imagine that many Otherlanders openly expressed shock and disdain every time you used the word “blonde” to refer to someone who happens to have yellow-ish hair. That Otherlanders looked at you as if you were an insensitive monster. That they sometimes even scolded you for using that word _in your own language_.

Wouldn't you be annoyed every time that happened? Wouldn't you feel the urge to say “you don't know my language, educate yourself!”

Let me introduce you to [the Spanish word “negro”](en.wiktionary.org/wiki/negro#N), which happens to exists also [in English as a loanword which gained different connotations](en.wiktionary.org/wiki/negro#E).

> _“We are so conditioned to think that our lives revolve around great moments. But great moments often catch us unawares.”_

kentnerburn.com/the-cab-ride-i

tripu boosted

So i noticed i don't necessarily need to agree with a toot to favourite it.
I just favd a toot from @tripu because he explained his thoughts well and thus made a reasonable discussion possible - something i value.
While i agree with the decision not to have a "downvote" button because it stops a lot of low-effort grief, this makes it all the more important to fav toots that actually make an effort to explain a point. Just to offset that toots dismissing all reason cannot be downvoted.

tripu boosted

@tripu This misses a very important point... While almost all land suitable for crops is also suitable for animals the reverse isnt true. In fact it is quite often the case animals are raised on land explicitly not suitable for crops. I dont know the exact breakdown, and that would be important to evaluate this fairly. But I know from my interaction with farmers that a great many of them raise their livestock on mountainous land not suited for crops and use fertile farmland mostly for crops.. Even when the land is flat and not mountainous it is often unsuitable for crops due to the makeup of the soil (too rocky, no good drainage, etc)

3️⃣ Number of animals affected:

You could reduce quite a lot your carbon footprint by replacing all your beef and lamb with chicken and fish (big mammals emit far more CO₂ per kg of protein than poultry and fish). The problem is, then [you would be indirectly responsible for many, many more individual animals raised in industrial farms and killed in slaughterhouses](hannahritchie.com/meat-environ).

Show thread

2️⃣ Carbon emissions:

Think you can stick to your steaks and omelettes and at the same time manage to significantly reduce your carbon footprint by “eating locally”? Actually, [transport accounts for a very small fraction of carbon released in food production](ourworldindata.org/food-choice) (be it plant- or animal-based).

Also,

> _“most food internationally comes by ship. And, actually shipping is very carbon efficient. You're going to emit 10 to 20 times less CO₂ than trucks per kilometre and 50 times less than flying. Most of your soy or your avocados are nearly always coming by ship and shipping actually has a very, very small carbon footprint.”_

— [Hannah Ritchie](econtalk.org/hannah-ritchie-on)

Show thread

1️⃣ Land usage:

[Crops for human consumption make up only 23% of all agricultural land worldwide, and yet they provide 83% of all calories](hannahritchie.com/convergence-).

Plant-based calories (and proteins) are much more efficient and require way less land and water than meat and dairy.

Show thread

I became a (aspiring ) almost exclusively to contribute to reduce animal .

With time, I realised that the _other_ reasons to avoid animal-based foods are surprisingly strong, too.

🧵

Sometimes, only sometimes, there is progress on the front. Not that you'll read a lot about it on the news, or see politicians and celebrities praising this development.

And yet, if you call yourself a you should celebrate this, and advocate for more countries to follow suit (otherwise, what kind of logical and moral contortions are you making to justify plain old, ages-old, sex-based discrimination?)

bloomberg.com/news/articles/20

tripu boosted

Read my lips:

An audio show that can only be played in an Apple player on an Apple device is not a podcast.

An audio show that can only be played in Spotify is not a podcast.

Repeat ad nauseam for any other proprietary audio show platforms.

A #podcast is an #RSS feed with enclosures of audio files which are playable across the whole ecosystem of podcast players.

Any reporter who reports on exclusive audio shows and calls them “podcasts” are doing a grave disservice to their audience.

tripu boosted

Since I left home and started working full time, I've lived in eight places (five cities, three countries, two continents, both sharing a flat and living alone).

For whatever reason, in none of those places there was a .

A month ago we moved to the ninth place (and sixth city), and now I have a dishwasher, and every day I"m like OH MY GOD THIS IS AWESOME THIS IS THE FUTURE.

tripu boosted
tripu boosted

@tripu It is the gold standard for replacing a missing personality. Works pretty well from what i have seen.

Adult human males discussing in all seriousness whether some soccer player is very good or not so good after all, whether he got the minutes he deserved last night or not, each one so sure about his ideas and about the importance of his ideas.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.