Alex Weber @weberam2@social.cleverlibre.org

"Where Did the Open Access Movement Go Wrong?" This is a really interesting interview. While I strongly support the #OA movement, it's also clear that OA has been coopted by many traditional journals to make money, entrenching barriers to academic publishing for unfunded, nontraditional and marginalised scholars. Leaving many of us unable to afford to publish. (Not forgetting the fantastic mainly-online journals that have no APCs on principle, which I know there are more and more of.)

https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/12/07/where-did-the-open-access-movement-go-wrong-an-interview-with-richard-poynder/

#AcademicChatter

'Where did the open access movement go wrong?'
#science #openaccess
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/12/07/where-did-the-open-access-movement-go-wrong-an-interview-with-richard-poynder/

There is a new book 📚 on #DataScience for #Neuroimaging by Ariel Rokem & Tal Yarkoni, including #Pythob #programming, #DataManagement, #visualization, and #MachineLearning and their application to neuroimaging.

🌍 https://press.princeton.edu/books/ebook/9780691222745/data-science-for-neuroimaging

#neuroscience

@weberam2 @xtaldave i like eLife and PLOS

the problem with Nat Comms is that their impact factor is massive. when i was still in academia and publishing regularly, the PIs all wanted to be in there. and it was really difficult. but when we got it, it usually made a huge splash.

@weberam2 conflict of interest from me, but for #metascience / #metaresearch I recommend https://mastodon.online/@RoRInstitute@indieweb.social

The Journal of Neuroscience is moving on to Open (but still anonymous) Peer-reviews! Nice!

Introducing Open Peer Review at JNeurosci

#Neuroscience #PeerReview

With the OpenAI clownshow, there's been renewed media attention on the xrisk/"AI safety"/doomer nonsense. Personally, I've had a fresh wave of reporters asking me naive questions (as well as some contacts from old hands who are on top of how to handle ultra-rich man-children with god complexes). 🧵1/

YES!
This is precisely what every university (and scholarly society!!) should be doing: have their own instance and drop X like a hot potato:

"an instance has been created [... ] on university servers, which is open to the university's organizational units. The active use of X will be significantly reduced."

https://www.uibk.ac.at/en/newsroom/2023/university-of-innsbruck-focuses-on-mastodon/

We detail all the arguments about precisely why that must happen here:
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.230207

Paywalled article here, I'll share once I have a non-paywalled link (hopefully soon): https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03610-5

The summary: astronomers spent a lot of time asking SpaceX and other large satellite operators to pretty please make their satellites fainter and/or use fewer satellites. And then BlueWalker 3 was launched by some tiny company and is one of the brightest things in the sky. Asking nicely isn't working: international regulation and pollution penalties are needed.

The "top" postdocs in Canadian are awarded 40,000 CAD/year by the government. It costs 45% of that salary to rent a 1-bedroom in Toronto.

The government announced yesterday that it's not increasing our funding.

"For over two decades, these critical contributors to research and innovation have received no funding increase from the federal government and now face significant financial challenges." - #SupportOurScience

https://www.supportourscience.ca/post/support-our-science-disappointment-with-the-lack-of-funding-for-graduate-students-and-postdoctoral
@academicchatter @academicsunite #Canada #Science