Calling #pinephone "beta" is really generous. It would be a crap smartphone for 8 years ago.
@jawsh I wasn't expecting a showstopper, but it's really lacking functionality that I'd consider basic for a smartphone product. It makes me wonder who managed product design and testing - do they not have enough issues already to keep devs busy for a while that they need to farm more issues from customers?
@linmob
@jawsh I wasn't able to use the SMS app, KDE Connect SMS, to send text messages. That's the biggest. The contacts app doesn't pull my SIM card contacts. The screen sleep settings aren't effective - the screen just turns off while I'm using the phone. The screen doesn't reliably turn on when I press the power button.
There are other first-boot issues I wrote down
@linmob
@2ck @jawsh @linmob
> The contacts app doesn't pull my SIM card contacts.
Wait. Did you have a feature phone (AKA dumb phone) before this? I've come late to smartphones, only having two Android phones since 2015. And I never found how to save my contacts to the SIM card. Android doesn't seem to support it.
@brad @jawsh @2ck While I have had a few gripes with GNOME over the years, it's not all bad here. Purism got most priorities right, and I am only writing most to not offend MMS users.
I would not worry about Wayland standards, as Phosh is a using a wlroots-based compositor and thus differs from what "big GNOME" does over the years.
@2ck @jawsh The actual @plasmamobile SMS app is called Spacebar. KDE Connect SMS would be the right choice if you were to send SMS via a KDE Connect connected device, e.g. an Android smartphone.
But yes, that launcher should be hidden, as it can be confusing.
@2ck @jawsh @linmob
Basically you're saying you didn't bother reading the text on the PP product page before ordering. Let me paste it here for you.
> This is the Beta Edition of the PinePhone. The pre-installed Manjaro with Plasma Mobile OS, that ships with this edition of the PinePhone, is a beta software build. This effectively means that while core functionality of the PinePhone still an ongoing effort. Thus, the device cannot considered a consumer-ready product.
@2ck @jawsh @linmob
If I sounded harsh in one of my other replies, it's because of this:
> they need to farm more issues from customers?
That you're using the term "consumer" makes me wonder if you are aware of what this project is, and how it's developed. Did you look at the wiki before getting your Pinephone? Did you go on the forum?
As for your issues, did you try to update your phone? But I agree with @jawsh regarding Phosh being more usable right now. I don't understand this choice...
@2ck @jawsh @linmob
... The only reason I can see for PINE64 choosing to install Plasma Mobile rather than Phosh is that it's sexier, and it looks a lot like Android, so it's more aligned to people's expectations of a smartphone. But IMHO, since ordinary "consumers" shouldn't be getting this phone in the first place, this was a mistake.
@normandc
I did read the product page. I didn't use the word "consumer". I understand that it's a community project (and that many people in that community are on Mastodon). On Masto, I'm seeing a lot of folks talking like Pinephone is a useable smartphone ("daily driver"), but having now used it, I'd say it's pretty far off the mark. Maybe the Pinephone is just meant to stay as a community project for computer geeks like us to tinker with: that's fine.
@jawsh @linmob
@2ck @jawsh @linmob
I stand corrected, I wrote consumer while you actually did write customer. Sorry, my poor excuse is it was late when I replied. Still, it may not be "daily driver" for you, but I've been using mine as such for 5 weeks now (not Plasma, mind you). It all depends on what you expect from a phone and the compromises you're willing to live with.
I'm not shy about my troubles with it either. But I don't like the alternative - going back to my Android spy device full time.
@2ck
It's actually by far the best phone available.
@ivanrancic best on what metrics?
@2ck
on a combined measure of all that matter
@ivanrancic no, seriously: I'd like to know what makes it the best in your eyes.
As a usable product, it falls flat in several ways. It couldn't read my SIM card's contacts. The UI is laggy. Touch screen has too much friction. Remaining charge estimation is unstable (moves up and down without charging the phone). Temperature control seems insufficient: the phone heats up when I'm doing hardly anything. Several of the default apps are, as admitted on the wiki, are either partially implementing features or only stubbing them out.
I think several issues can be resolved with a more polished OS. Yes, I can install a different OS, but Pine64 *chose* the OS to put on as a default, so I would hope the picked the best they could find/build for the hardware: If not, then WTF are they thinking?
@2ck imagine how good it will be if it's already the greatest with those issues!
Of course it has issues. But it's incredible how much just Plasma Mobile grew over the last year alone (let alone all projects).
GNU/Linux on phones is a wonderful endeavor, with PinePhone being one of its basic elements. The whole thing is so much more than a hardware or software. It's about an idea, a vision. A small glimpse of a better future in this confused and so often wicked world.
@2ck Well, compared to the community driven #LinuxPhone of yore, the #OpenMoko, it's already pretty good. Maybe try a few distributions, or try to see it less as a serious phone and more as a fun work in progress. Get in touch if I can help 🙂