🔖 Statistical code in a high-impact medical journal

A journal started asking authors to submit code with their manuscripts. They then analysed the next 314 papers accepted

87% denied using code, even when publishing substantial statistical analysis

10% used code but refused to share it with the journal

For the few that provided code, none scored even moderately on basic quality criteria

Assel & Vickers
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/

#MedMastodon
#OpenScience
#ResearchWaste
#doi:10.7326/M17-2863

Follow

@JessButler I followed the work of the Force 11 Software Citation Working Group for while. A while ago they transitioned to the Software Citation *Implementation* Working Group which is still active. I'd recommend checking out their Principles article for anyone interested in these issues peerj.com/articles/cs-86/
and their GitHub github.com/force11/force11-sci

@2ck @JessButler did they use excel or did they just lie? Unsure what's more shocking 😖

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.