Follow

@gwagner

Not your fault and not just you, but I'd like to point out that everyone is using this as an about 10%, when it actually says "at least 10%" right up front. That also only accounts for "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections" when it then states "The incidence is estimated at 10–30% of non-hospitalized cases, 50–70% of hospitalized cases and 10–12% of vaccinated cases."

It's almost certainly on the low side given that an estimated 7.5% of US adults already had Long COVID last June.

cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_pr

Bottom line, 10% is a bare minimum and the chances of us escaping with "only" 10% of people having Long COVID has likely already long passed us by.

@gwagner @BE Right. The authors used the low end of the estimated ranges 10-30%, 50-70%, and 10-12% to come up with 10% as a “conservative estimate.” I would have worded that as the “most conservative estimate.” It would certainly be reasonable that the actual number be significantly higher.
#LongCovid

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.