My major objection to security keys is simple: I am a forgetful motherfucker and I will lose a tiny physical key within hours, and the backup immediately after that

theverge.com/2023/11/15/239624

@scalzi How about standardizing the use of ssh keys instead? They always work, do not require a password, are extremely secure, and they're free. Is it because they're free that everyone wants to manufacture keys now? I'm going to start enabling them on websites for logging in --> me <-- to see how impossibly difficult this must be for corporations to even consider manufacturing more electronic, disposable, toxic-to-the-environment redundant crap designed to make a rich C-student CEO richer.

Follow

@scalzi @steter

Because if your system is compromised - which is often the goal of phishing attacks - the attacker can easily copy your keys. Not mine - I have them encrypted with a password, you might consider it. You can't copy a physical security key, nor can you activate it remotely.

@Biggles @scalzi Sure. In the Valley, industrial spies were just breaking in & stealing hardware. Phishing was for amateurs.

I have no trust for physical locks of any kind. They just slow someone down, often not by much. Drive encryption helps. So does fingerprint ID. I could misplace a physical key or USB stick w/ssh keys. It could be stolen from my pocket. More difficult to misplace or steal a finger. Don't need more billionaire plastic e-waste.

Definitely not locks:

youtube.com/@lockpickinglawyer

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.