@iiqof@mastodont.cat @IngaLovinde

Thanks for your response.

First a disclaimer: I am not sure if I am not trespassing on some unwritten rule somewhere. The OP asked me not to speak to her on this thread, and I try to respect that.

Now to your comment: Inga's violence has limit, Nazi's don't have it.

She said this:
> "They can all burn"
and then this:
> "I'm not saying all of them should burn. They can also choose to not be Nazis;"

To me, the most charitable interpretation of these statements is that "somebody shall get rid of them".

Nazi's or not, everybody in this thread, we are all part of one society, whether we like it or not. Planning violence, or wishing for it to happen to our fellow humans is simply not helpful. It only fuels rage. Nothing good comes out of rage.

I just learned in my life the hard way that "being against" is easy and also useless. What leads to a change for better for all of us is "being for something". I would prefer to argue here about what we shall together do towards a better future for all of us, rather than crying how everything is bad and theorising about how things ought to be while the world outside is running forward without us. But I got booted out of this conversation, so what does my opinion count anyway...